![]() |
Sorry guys but Nissan isn't as reliable as Honda or Toyota, do not get a high mileage Nissan ever
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 505
Drives: 2010 370z 6spd Sport
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
![]()
I'd have to disagree, especially with such a extreme as "ever". You don't think Nissan is reliable? I'm pretty sure the Z can easily double the mileage that is already on the car he's looking at, especially if it has been well cared for. OP, honestly don't scare away from the car just because it has 70k miles, which IMO isn't even that high, maybe for the year it is though. You stated you looked at it and everything on the car seems solid. Get it inspected by one of the certified techs if it hasn't already been and try to talk them down in price, which you should be able to fairly easily since it has higher than average mileage for the year. Being a automatic would be a deal breaker right away for me, but that's me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,059
Drives: slowwww
Rep Power: 30 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
You also need to first define how something is considered reliable and go by each model year specifically. I'm sure there are plenty of cars in Toyota and Honda's portfolio that are less reliable than others...the same goes for Nissan. My dad's 98 Maxima, bought new for example, had close to 122k miles and was still running strong before we sold it about a year ago. Aside from fixing normal stuff that wear out, she was plenty reliable. By the same token, I had a 92 v6 Camry with a blown engine at 120k miles. The interior was still in really great shape and all the electronics still worked though, but it was just a useless piece of metal at that point. Before that, I had an 89 Civic that had every body panel rusting out, parts falling off and making noises...but that frikin' motor refused to die. It's up to the owner to keep a car reliable and it's up to the owner to decide what part is considered a wear item vs an unreliable part. I guess my point is, manufacturer reliability ratings rely heavily on opinions, not facts. The same goes for re-sale values. If a part was not well made to begin with, they usually need replacement early in the ownership and usally get covered under warranty anyways. Given that the average car ownership is 6 years, it fair to say just about any new car today will last that long mechanically at a minimum. That wasn't always true, which is why there was once a great emphasis on reliability ratings. I just think people have a higher standard these days because we're living in a world where returning a piece of electronic device because it's not perfect is normal. That's fine for an iPod, not so simple when it's an entire car. There are literally thousands of things that can go wrong and I think for the most part, just about every manufacturer these days is on the right track at making all modern cars "reliable." The problem is, people want more creature comforts in their cars, which means more stuff to go wrong. It's silly to label an entire car lineup unreliable because of a broken stereo, but for some people, that's enough to label it a POS. Most new cars made these days a better made, regardless of manufacturer. ...except maybe cars from China.
__________________
![]() [09][MB][6-Spd MT][Touring][Stillen Gen III][K&N][Borla CBE][Evo-R] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
My grandfather still drives an older model Nissan truck with over 300k on the clock. The speedo doesn't read correct anymore, but besides that, nothing is wrong with it. Nissans are JUST as reliable as other manufacturers, you just have to not be a putz when it comes to routine maintenance. 70k isn't high mileage and hasn't been since probably the 80's or 90's. People who dump a well maintained vehicle after 70k because they think it has too many miles or that they can't get good resale for it are brain dead morons and should take a intro to finance class because they obviously do not understand money.
__________________
Last edited by Spikuh; 01-23-2013 at 11:04 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
W.t.b. 370z Nismo miles can be High, please read | mam1 | Wanted | 8 | 12-06-2011 11:23 PM |
WTT: ERZ High Flow Cats for good OEM Cats with low miles only (15k or less) | '10Anamoly | Wanted | 4 | 09-14-2011 05:42 PM |
Berk High Flow Cats (HFC) 3k miles, $350 shipped | Dan37TZ | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 16 | 09-09-2010 01:18 PM |
EVO-R CF Air Ducts, Good Idea / Bad Idea ? | toxik | Intake/Exhaust | 3 | 06-28-2010 06:44 PM |
Stillen High flow cats low miles NY | hittindabong | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 0 | 05-10-2010 09:29 AM |