![]() |
Originally Posted by Kamus One of the things that has me wondering if i should've gotten an Evo over my Z is the turbo. And not for the usual reasons.
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 122 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
FI is the way to go at altitude. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14860 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The mountain cars of choice in puerto rico are the Evo and wrx... That said though. The Z has enough power that in PR, people buy them cuz they are great mountain cutters too. I wouldn't get an FR-S unless you plan on running 14lbs of boost on a consistent level. If i lived in mountainous region. I would opt for the AWD turbo car hands down. I might even forgo a sports car and trick out a Jeep Wrangler.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|