![]() |
New Motortrend review of 2012 370Z
Have to say, this is one of the few reviews that i can absolutely agree with from motortrend on the 370Z, sorry if this is a repost, but video was posted by motortrend on the 27th of this month.
2012 Nissan 370Z: The Rough and Tumble Sports Car! - Ignition Episode 30 - YouTube |
i take it from the lack of responses everyone has seen this video already? lol
|
Pretty much spot on. Sums up my impression of the car. I like the fact that the Z requires some effort to drive, like the old sports cars of my youth. That's why I bought one.
|
Why is Motor Trend reviewing so many 370Z's lately? And even still, why aren't they reviewing the 2013 model?
I want to know more about the Euro Tuned suspension!! And how it compares to the 2012 model. So if they're going to test the Z twice in the same week, at least should have made it the 2013 model. |
Two and a half years 21,000 miles and not one of those problems he mentioned.
|
Quote:
I dont think its a second review. Its just the video to the original review. And I would like to point out again a 0-60 time on Par with 400+ HP muscle cars. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
True. The problem is people do not understand that I jump to conclusions, kind of like that Nismo CarAndDriver put into the wall at VIR a few years ago. |
Quote:
eh no problem man, heck even i know my VLSD will eventually go out but i plan to replace it with a real LSD long before then anyway...still kinda disappointing that nissan would choose to cheap out on not putting a real LSD in there to begin with though or at least give us the option of putting one of their Nismo GT clutch type LSD on the car. i know i was just browsing through their build your own Z tool and noticed they now give you the option of choosing Nismo parts including the catback exhaust system. |
Quote:
Yea the LSD should have been better but I guess that's how they keep cost down. Performance of a 55-60k Cayman/Boxster for 30-40k. |
Hi Im Forest...whats a LSD can do to your car? Would it help me stop RUNNIN???
|
Quote:
|
Best Review In Years...
Some people may not like how the Z gets the job done. But when it's done, in most cases it will be the victor. The Z in the hands of a skilled driver is one of those cars, that a skeptic in the passengers seat will be shockingly surprised after a thrillrush ride. If you are set on driving one type of car ONLY,ie muscle or lightweight sports car like miatas. The Z will feel like it doesn't have an identity. But if your driving skill can adapt to anything? The Z's Bi-polar capability will be intoxicatingly addicting. The current Z is a car for those that get it... in other words a seriously niché car. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cool. Review wasn't lazy, random regurgitation or PR for other cars. It was actually Z relevant. Win!
|
not a bad review, nice to know you have to work it, and that is why I enjoy my Z,
problems are probably because its Press Car and everyone it testing it. I have almost 20K on my in a year, and it still runs nice and strong, just wished I had more time to autocross it than I have only 3 times since I got it in October 11 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Great review and I agree but that z has been beaten on it's whole life to test its performance. The dude recognized that and test it for what it was. Just a really fun, fast, car to drive. Even if it's a repost, it's a great one.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1: reduces (effectively removes) the heat issue; keeps working for track use 2: doesn't burn up after a couple of track days 3: significantly more consistent and predictable lockup, not to mention faster response with the torsen 4: fanbois don't tell people their torsen diff is a "vicious" differential :icon17: The torsen still runs into delivery issues if you lift a tire, but for most weekend warriors, losing power over a curb isn't catastrophic (and may even be preferable) |
Hmmm, pretty fair review compared to some I've seen
I do find this car is tougher to manipulate than some others but thats why I love it and everyday I'm still learning how to get the most out of it I never get tired of seeing a Z in action (since I never get to see me driving lol) |
Quote:
But you do have much more track time than me and I would like to ask you, between quaife and os giken. Which do you recommend as a dual street and track lsd and why? This I don't know so i'm seriously asking? Thanks in advance. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I really personally have a strong preference towards torsen over clutch-type, mostly because the engagement on a clutch-type diff can be harsh, and the need to rebuild is a PITA. I understand that the OSG has relatively mild rebuild needs, and it doesn't come on too harshly. You'd probably be better served talking to someone that has run with one. For my money, I'd go with quaife, although I will say that it seems like clutch-types are getting more civil. |
Quote:
|
Anyone know what the pros and cons are for the torsen vs. a quaife?
|
Quote:
|
oops, i thought we were referring to a brand, haha, ok.
|
Quote:
|
Interesting....
|
An honest review. Nissan makes a brute type of car w/ power and torque.
|
I'm just glad he wasn't blindly bashing it like most people seem to have been doing in their reviews lately.
|
Quote:
So if a guy loves Camry's? He expects the z to have 6 cup-holders. If he loves Cadillac's...Why doesn't the z have 12 memory power seats? If he loves Mustangs... Why can't the Z have a V8... This isn't car reviewing. Are they basing a car on its talents or your bias interpretation of a sports car. It's ok for a reviewer to express his preferences in order for the consumer to relate to the driver and understand why he would prefer a, lets say, "Mustang" over a Z. But it's another to compare the cars as if they serve the same performance purpose, when they don't. At least mustang has camaro and challenger to show up. The genesis coupe can go 10k upmarket and battle the G37 and 3 series. In a way, the 2.0 and FR-S doesn't match but makes more sense due to them being priced equally and both being RWD 4 seat coupes. The Z has no competitor in its class and can only be compared the Porsche Cayman S, Boxster and BMW Z4 over $20k upmarket, double what the gencoupe deals with.... They can say the others are more refined but can't say they outperform the Z. So the Z needs to be underdogged by near non-competitors in order to keep the corporate sponsors happy. The Z is too unique in its price-point and other car companies are to scared to make a real competitor. Imagine GM's version of a Z? Or ford? Dodge maybe? lol. The vette is something else... Japanese couldn't make a vette... Americans can't build a Z. And you can't review them like they are one of the same. BUT that's what american/british magazines do. WE NEED TO GET CAR GUYS BACK IN THE CAR MAGS. |
Quote:
Sent from my iPizzle using magic and new-fangled science stuff |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2