Quote:
|
Saw one on the street this past weekend while I was in NY. It does look pretty nice, but I'll also agree that it is not on the same level as the Z. Also FR-S competing with the BRZ :rofl2:
|
:icon18: :roflpuke2::rofl2::roflpuke2:
We all know car salesmen are idiots who don't know anything about cars themselves. This was referring to shineybluez's post |
Quote:
|
this thread is going to explode today
|
Quote:
i think the BRZ/FRS should be compared to non-aspirated :icon17: subcompact wannabie cars. |
Quote:
Non-aspirated :roflpuke2: |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
dang, i thought them were like $25K. :( no sense of cost savings here. :ugh2: just get the 370Z then and do it right from the beginning. |
Quote:
( Click to show/hide )
|
I like the frs/brz for what it is, but it isn't exactly 'cheap' and would much rather have an MX-5. The Z is just too different an audience to even compare the two. To get close to the performance numbers of a stock Z, you'd probably end up spending a ton more on the frs/brz.
|
Quote:
|
I think the pros for the FR-S/BRZ outweigh the cons and when compared from a tuner's aspect the FR-S is the way to go. Need I remind the long time Z guys that we had to wait a very very very very long time for the Z after market to grow. Even now the aftermarket for the z34 is no where near as big as it was for the z33 and other previous Z cars and its been 3.5 years. Greddy already has a reputable TT kit out and the car hasn't been on US soil for a 6 months. The FR-S has is a tuner's wet dream, cheap starting platform (after the dealers stop pushing ridiculous ADM's) and massive competition amongst aftermarket vendors. The FR-S aftermarket is going to dwarf the Z very quickly, social media is already full of pics and concepts that major aftermarket companies are making.
Performance wise, sure the Z will dominate for now but think about how expensive it is to really build the Z34, you're looking at close to 3/4 the cost of the car for a well built and tuned TT kit, an S/C kit will run you at least 10g's. Moreover, while dyno #'s are nice making 500whp+ is useless on a road course, to date I don't think I've seen any TT member even attempt to run it all out at a road course. So you have potentially extreme HP #'s that are good for the drag strip which is not the Z's forte but create a largely uncontrollable monster at the track. I think the biggest issue with the FR-S is that it comes off as too young but I could probably get around that knowing that the aftermarket for the FR-S is huge. Moreover, call it a gut feeling but given the proper driver a FR-S properly tuned and turboed is going to embarrass a lot of Z guys at the track. |
Geez
Amazing that people post stuff that is flat wrong, especially when the automotive press has covered these cars so extensively.
The two cars are almost identical, sheet-metal aside. (Suspensions--and hence handling characteristics--differ.) Every review I've read says the cars are woefully underpowered, but otherwise show promise, e.g., with tuner work on the existing engine or an altogether different power-plant. |
Quote:
|
Look at the compression ratio on the FR-S, it wont handle boost well.
|
Quote:
Such is the BRZ Limited. order one for your push-button start, alcantara interior, and rear spoiler, and be prepared to pay through the nose and buy without test drive. I would never buy a car like this. I have to test drive the exact car I'm looking for. If nothing else, I'll drive it the day of delivery without a penny spent, or they can kiss my sale goodbye. |
Quote:
FWIW, I've seen a both the BRZ and FR-S in flesh now. I thought they looked great for what they are. One guy was on the highway doing some "pulls" and seemed to be accelerating fairly quickly, nothing that impressive though. |
Quote:
|
While the FRS isn't exactly fast or grunt-y compared to the Z, it does wake up quite a bit after 5000 rpm.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's probably going to win the 24 hrs of Le Mans next year in all likelihood
|
Quote:
....and to be fair, we haven't seen any turbo'd FR-S on the streets, let alone on the track to really know how it handles FI. You don't see too many TT'd 370z's around a track because for the most part, a few bolt on's and reducing weight is all you really need. There's even a few racing teams on here that follow that concept. I really like the FR-S/BRZ, I just think there's just too much hype about this car. I see too many similarities with the RX-8 (another car that could have used FI). Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's Mazda territory. I hope they do. |
Quote:
|
lol whats really funny is almost 2010+ family sedans go 0-60 in 7 secs. like the ford taurs that TT goes less then 7 secs
|
people keep saying "great car if you're on a budget" 25k aint no budget. almost the price of my car, which is way better. i dont get how im the only one who thinks this car is overpriced. o well who cares. im not buying one.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://cdn4.digitaltrends.com/wp-con...picture-1.jpeg |
lol my maxima would make that scion thing look like a honda fit LOL
family cars rule |
Quote:
their new CX5 looks normal at least... but it looked like a hyundai in person. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mazda understands that you don't have to have the most powerful or best handling machine on the road to create a really fun vehicle. |
Quote:
|
i dont see how the back seat existance can be used as a practicality excuse for a price hike either. most of my family / friends would rather be punched in the groin than forced to be confined in that entrapment, even for a short trip
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2