Official Crappy Parkers Thread

[Tigger]

Please tell me the cops and tow truck were called on that asshat in the Lexus. I just don't get it. Why? What's so important that someone has to do that? That is, indeed, the shittiest Parker I've ever seen. EVER.

[vtec to vvel]

Originally Posted by Tigger

Please tell me the cops and tow truck were called on that asshat in the Lexus. I just don't get it. Why? What's so important that someone has to do that? That is, indeed, the shittiest Parker I've ever seen. EVER.

depending on whether that parking place was public or private property, cops cant do anything, except for drivers info exchange, on private property. and thats only if they even show up.

[Tigger]

Originally Posted by vtec to vvel

depending on whether that parking place was public or private property, cops cant do anything, except for drivers info exchange, on private property. and thats only if they even show up.

That can be interpreted differently. Vandalism on private property is subject to police involvement. That was pure negligence and damage was caused. It isn't an "accident." That's how you'd have to get around it. But you are right. That is if the cops even show the **** up.

[vtec to vvel]

Originally Posted by Tigger

That can be interpreted differently. Vandalism on private property is subject to police involvement. That was pure negligence and damage was caused. It isn't an "accident." That's how you'd have to get around it. But you are right. That is if the cops even show the **** up.

True, but here's the thing: from the point of view from an LEO, since the LEO didn't actually see what had happened, s/he wouldn't be able to determine who's at fault (based on this picture, it could go two ways where it could have been either of the vehicles at fault). without actual proof, and if on private property, it would be a civil matter, not criminal (i.e. vandalism). i get your logic of negligence, however, unfortunately, it's not a crime to be dumb. no doubt damage was caused, however, there are always two sides to a story, and then there's the truth.

[Tigger]

Originally Posted by vtec to vvel

True, but here's the thing: from the point of view from an LEO, since the LEO didn't actually see what had happened, s/he wouldn't be able to determine who's at fault (based on this picture, it could go two ways where it could have been either of the vehicles at fault). without actual proof, and if on private property, it would be a civil matter, not criminal (i.e. vandalism). i get your logic of negligence, however, unfortunately, it's not a crime to be dumb. no doubt damage was caused, however, there are always two sides to a story, and then there's the truth.

Ugh. Your logic is sound and that's the sad part. :/

Summary destruction of douchebags needs to be allowed.

[axmea?]

Originally Posted by Zbrah

Poor Raf, always surrounded with handicapped drivers

Have you gotten any dings yet?

Nope thank goodness. I inspect during lunch hour and when I just have to stretch and take a walk.

Originally Posted by Merv

I'm guessing no,or we would of definately heard by now!
I don't know about you guys,but I find I'm always checking over the car for nicks scratches and bruises! And when I absolutely have to park between two vehicles,I take a pic so I'm covered for any small mishaps!

You are right. You'd hear it by now. And yes I do the exact same thing walking around to check but I never take pics between two cars. Come to think of it, I never park between cars......except during meets.

Originally Posted by JC-Nismo

Dude where the hell are you parking???

It's a mess where I work.

Originally Posted by victort

hate to say it, but that's what happens when you give them too much space on one side.

Give them a foot and they take a yard. I might try taking my cone or stantion with me. Just for the heck of it.

[vtec to vvel]

Originally Posted by axmea?

Give them a foot and they take a yard. I might try taking my cone or stantion with me. Just for the heck of it.

cones work wonders