:owned:

I can't mess with the equations, but I can do this:

Fix'd(t=t0+k) >> Fix'd (t=t0)

At this point, Andrew (eggo), is probably thinking, "Gosh, I really hope you guys didn't do anything like this in your Zs..."

:bowrofl:

yeah but i did find some odd stains on the hood of your old car this weekend while washing. I had to get an orbital buffer out.

but

|Fix'd(t=t0+k)| << |Fix'd (t=t0)|

Which is what matters, as the quality of a fix becomes more negative as it gets better.

Did you get them out? Dude... I remember those. Effing hated them and I couldn't get them out with my PC. Maybe I didn't try hard enough, but they annoyed the eff out of me. They just naturally appeared in the clear. :mad:

Wait, he has your old Z? I'm not gonna be able to look this guy in the face, ever.

Yes, he's the guy.

His first name is my middle name, too. It's like... fate. :eek:

wow.... lol, just wow. steve, you scumbag

General rule that you should share at least one name with the next owner of your car.

oh God well now Im going to have to post to buy a whole new interior because i have to burn my old one........


yeah i got a couple of them out. My buddy at his body shop is going to take another crack on the big one. I dont have the confidence to not screw up the clear coat.

beyond derailing this thread, the only tags are 8===================)~ symbols!

The universal sign of a good time. :yum:

fixed

I disagree. Fix'd at t=t0+k is at least two orders of magnitude greater than Fix'd at t=t0 because you only quoted one post and didn't declare Fix'd. I on the other hand, declared Fix'd^2 and quoted two posts.

On my phone now, so my response time has been shot down. Also in class now :roflpuke2:

you broke'd it.