![]() |
Quote:
https://youtu.be/VKHFZBUTA4k |
Quote:
between the idiot engineers and all the new hires:iamwithstupid: |
Quote:
|
Doug's review is more than fair, I actually thought he'd score it a lot worse, since the Z has fallen so far behind modern competition. He knocks on it for how little features it has, but if he consistently does this with all the vehicles he reviews, it'd be stupid if he gave it more points for "being good for the time". He never pretends to be an expert, but he certainly has experience reviewing vehicles.
It's amazing so many of you trash him while also saying "i'll stick to people who know what they're talking about" - why? If anybody listened to experts, none of us would own Z cars. |
Quote:
Edit: add architects to that list too, you should not be allowed to draw anything without 5 years minimum apprenticeship in that field |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am a millennial, albeit the earlier part of the group, but work my @$$ off and hard to live the life I have. Most of the millennial group, IMO, feel entitled and don’t want to work for sh*t (if you are offended by this comment, then you probably fall under this category). Even at my job, I got promoted a few times fairly quickly, even above people who were once my superiors. |
Quote:
"That's how I've always done it" is not an acceptable excuse for being stupid. That just means you've been doing it wrong for a long fuckin time, dumbass :shakes head: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I had to subscribe to this guy's YouTube's channel and I know what he says is semi-accurate but in general, he tries to be funny not knowing that some of his trashings make the actual owners of the vehicles he is reviewing unhappy as really how can you tell how a car feels if you base it on having it less than a day. I have a friend who bought a Miata and hates it yet Dougie says its the best car in the world....he is entertaining thou if you have nothing else to do but look at his channel. Thanks to him I'm switching to porn or maybe the channel called A Woman Driven at least she has nice hams...:driving:
|
This thread went downhill fast
|
Quote:
And I just re-read my post and wasn’t referring to you about the comment in parenthesis being possibly offensive, but rather to the general public. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
This thread needs a new direction. . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For those that gripe about the Z that bought earlier models, ok I can understand. But for those that recently bought, you knew what you were buying and still gripe about being outdated? Why did you buy? |
I didn't read this entire thread, but did anyone catch the part where he said there was a "subwoofer where the spare should be, but there's no spare"?
He didn't even bother to look a little deeper/better to see that the sub is mounted to the spare. Things like this and all the other stuff mentioned in this thread is precisely why I never pay attention to reviewers no matter what it is. If I want to read reviews on something, I dig up random forums and sites online where actual people like you and me post up our actual experiences with the product. That's where you get your most accurate reviews, not some a$$ clown who thinks he knows what he's talking about and makes a living off of it. |
You figure a "professional" review would include research before doing the review. Just so you don't come across like a dumbass. The fact that a few things he said sound like diarrhea. Also, I guess I am one of those true sports car type guys though, I mean, who needs electric seats and sound deadening material because of "road noise", only to spoil the ride by adding weight. Then have "reviewers" complain about the Z being too heavy for a sports car.
There has always been hate by most reviewers on this car. People should make thier own opinion by test driving one before judging on some else's biased diarrhea, erm, review. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A true sports car, IMO, would be something raw and without the luxuries. I think Honda did a good job with the s2k CR where even AC was an option. |
Some people should stop and think about what it actually takes to develop a brand new car and how much that costs. When you sell more mustangs in one year than Nissan has sold of the 370z since 2009, there is a lot less to invest in future models. Ford can sell enough to invest in a new mustang every 5 years or so. Nissan maybe waiting to make return investment before investing into a new Z.
|
Eh, in 2008, the car was a $45k vehicle, but now? No way. Not when we have camaros and mustangs absolutely slaying it for much less. Back in 2008, you needed a P car, Cobra, or corvette to tear it up. Even as late as 2014 or so the mustang lacked irs, etc. and the camaro sucked. Now? The Z is just a fanboy car. Nothing wrong with that if you're a fanboy, and thats okay, but it has no curremt selling points from a technical stance.
|
Quote:
|
Sounds like I struck a nerve, not my intent. Purpose of my comparison was simply for sales figures only. The fact that people compare the Z to a muscle car, pony car and SEDAN, is absurd. When you compare apples to apples performance wise and in the same category, the Z is STILL a good buy for what you get. The Z was never intended to be a muscle car equivalent. And if they did, I personally would move on from the Z, and buy a sports car/grand tourer.
|
Quote:
|
Base is around $30,000
Sport is around $34,000 Nismo is around $45,000 You can find many 2015-2017 Nismo models used with under 30,000 miles for less than $30,000 on auto trader. Edit: The new supra will be $50,000-$55,000. It is also made in Austria, has been in development for years, is just a hard top Z4, and was co-developed with BMW to save costs on developing a new sports car. |
Quote:
|
I was annoyed that he seemed upset over the Z not including rear seats for the price. Bringing up rear seats as a comparison is ridiculous, as anyone who's tried to use the rear seats in a Mustang will attest to them being quite useless outside of a backpack. Regardless of price, sports cars don't need rear seats! It's not a selling point for a sports car! He complained about the lack of a storage compartment behind the driver's seat. It's a driver-focused design with elements accessible to the driver. The gauge clusters are a staple of the Z brand - we all know the clock is redundant! The digital screen is old, but neither of those things negatively affect what the car is made for.
Yes, the NISMO, is overpriced if purchased new today, but I don't know anyone who's purchased it new. He complained about the NISMO/Z badge in various places on the car, but didn't complain about that same treatment on the Koenigsegg Agera he reviewed last year. He was actual quite fond of that on the Agera, which contradicts his own opinions. It shows that he's quite unfairly biased in his "reviews", didn't know a lot about the NISMO, and shouldn't be taken seriously. It's a 10 year old enthusiasts car with no nanny assists, and I don't miss any of that. Just wish the NISMO started at 400WHP NA... |
I agree with the above post ^
|
As I told you guys already, his review's get a Dougey score of 2. Some folks like him, I just don't care for his style at all.
|
I got my 2019 nismo with great finance rate under CDN msrp. I dont know why us pricing is exact same (47k cdn vs 47k usd) difference is yuge. Like worst deal in like the history of ever for the usa.
|
Lol dang this review hit a nerve, there even a rebuttal out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slu57zARzG4 Wtf, even Harris review didn't get this much noise. So out of curiosity I watch the damn thing again. No, he doesn't like it but he also stated the following (more/less): - faster than I expected - decent auto transmission for not being dc - reasonable power - tighter, surprisingly well balanced (handling an asset) - noise is OK, good but not 40k good (expecially compared to regular Z) - end of life; needs a refresh (not competitive anymore) Nothing new, nothing crazy or misleading. And to highlight his summary.. ...This is a fun car, its exciting, its thrilling, it looks cool and its fast. Just not enough to justify 40K. The Doug score just his thing and far from perfect, but there is gem in there as well - handling is 7/10. Totally normal for anyone to state you don't like someone, that how the internet works lol. But geez the dude drives a ford GT and gave the Z a 7/10 for handling, one of the *main* reason we own this car. Im out guys lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
GT86/BRZ 911 older 2+2 Z's older Supra etc. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
base mustang - normal (economy) engine - normal suspension/tires - normal aerodynamic (smaller spoilers, etc) muscle version - high output engine - larger wheels/tires - stiffer suspension - more aerodynamic You won't see the ecoboost mustang being compared to the Z, a cayman or even a miata. Its going to be the GT and that cool, they are impressive but its still a bit of a wannabe sports car. |
What was Dougie’s score on his Mustang’s electric power steering unit that craps out just after warranty?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2