Originally Posted by RequiemZ (Post 3392144)

Haha, ive be itching to go for a test drive, but weather has been holding me back fro the last 2 weeks, so all my info has been from this site. Must have read 50% of the site's threads lol.



So maybe I left a couple things out. I have always loved the 370z, never actually been in one though. Also my Tiburon has quite a bit of work done to it to hopefully compete with the next level of sports cars, I realize now that there is a limit to how driveable and functional a high horsepower fwd car can be.

Here are 2 pics of my current Tiburon:

http://i1078.photobucket.com/albums/...1.jpg~original

http://i1078.photobucket.com/albums/...1.jpg~original

As far as it stands, I am actually parting out the performance and will be setting it up as a dedicated track car but n/a. As much as the suspension was modified I would guess its still less then the 370z skidpad and cornering ability. Power wise it is faster in a straight line by a decent margin. But driveability is where it falls off hard, it is hard to drive it almost anywhere unless I'm in racemode lol.

I want a nice streetable car, with good power, great handling, nice interior, 2 seater, and has a 'fun' factor. I believe the 370z fills this and then some.

Anyways I appreciate the response, I cant wait to drive one this next week. I am literally about to pull the trigger to buy one, I just want to drive one and see if its what I think I would have lots of enjoyment out of. Also it wouldn't stay stock for long, maybe a couple days lol. But I think I would hold back this time and only do the most impactful mods more slowly instead of building an entire car 100 times over.

Originally Posted by 2011 Nismo#91 (Post 3392631)

I had a 2005 Tiburon SE for almost 6 years prior to the Z.
1. FWD is so much easier and more forgiving in bad weather. Not to say the Z can't deal with bad weather but FWD deals with it better.
2. Also the 2+2 layout means you can technically take 4 people if you had to.
3. A trunk to put stuff out of sight.
4. Regular maintenance and gas was much cheaper in the Tiburon. Cheap gas, cheap oil, cheap tires etc. Insurance wasn't much different.

A few things that are the same. Modding and aftermarket parts are expensive when compared to more common sports cars. Tiburon had clutch issues wearing out early (IMO was from driver inexperience) so does the Z the CSC (concentric slave cylinder) on the clutch fails on many cars.

One thing I did like coming from the Tiburon was it used a timing belt which was a pain to change, the Z uses a chain which doesn't need service.

http://www.the370z.com/members/2011-...5-img-1893.jpg

http://www.the370z.com/members/2011-...6-img-1899.jpg

http://www.the370z.com/members/2011-...7-img-1885.jpg

Originally Posted by mishuko (Post 3393551)

and apparently civics are a blast to drive in civic nation cause vtech yo

Originally Posted by mishuko (Post 3393551)

and apparently civics are a blast to drive in civic nation cause vtech yo

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 3393596)

ive not driven the new civic, but the previous gen was such a POS it was unbelievable. :mad:

even my wife who's not a car person at all said she hated it. the dealer loan it to us while her brand new mexican Fit EX needed warranty work. :shakes head:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3394496)

why is this thread still going? lol

Originally Posted by njobe89 (Post 3394490)

the 2000 si was beastly back then. :D

Originally Posted by Leingod (Post 3394572)

Because he drove a m/t tibby :rofl2:

Originally Posted by Leingod (Post 3394572)

Because he drove a m/t tibby :rofl2: