Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   The carmax and carfax fight (will update regularly) (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/108770-carmax-carfax-fight-will-update-regularly.html)

BamBamZ 11-05-2015 12:39 AM

The carmax and carfax fight (will update regularly)
 
Long story short, Bought a car from carmax, At the time everything seemed okay... Tried to trade it in and a accident shows up on the carfax report that wasn't there until last October that took place October 2009 (6 years ago). I was sold the 370Z being told it had a clean history and no previous accidents... Right now, I have just started fighting with Carmax and i'll update as this progresses.

But for now, Here's the detailed story.

-February 2015, I purchased the 2009 370Z Sport/Touring/Nav 6spd for $25K ($29K after everything was said and done, but put a $11K down payment)

-Most of March and early april the Z takes 4 trips to carmax in Modesto for various repairs, a chunk missing in the headlight, front chin spoiler missing, front bumper not aligned properly, missing clips, dead TPMS sensor and unusual scrapes... They fixed all but the scrapes, Found out the bumper had several missing brackets.

-2 CSC's later and $3000 in maintenance, repairs and upgrades that literally only include a TWM shifter, shift knob, wheel spacers, some LED's and window tint... I'm growing tired of the car.

-November 1st I go into carmax to get an appraisal on the Z and walk out with a $17K offer... As they did the appraisal I roamed the lot and found a 2015 Toyota 4Runner Trail Premium for $40K that I really liked. But it's only $1K less than a new 2016.

-November 3rd I go into Livermore Toyota that has a Nautical Blue 2016 4Runner trail premium for $42K... I test drive and hand over the keys to the Z for their own appraisal. After about an hour the manager comes up to me and asks how to start the car... I explain it to him and he runs off but fails again and asks me to show him. As were walking out he's asking questions and mentions an accident on the carfax. That causes me stumble a bit... What?, I had 0 accidents and when carmax ran the autocheck it showed nothing of the sort when I bought it and when I got it appraised.

I asked to see it and he shows me 10/09/09 accident reported with the 1st owner (i'm 3rd), I think it's just a ploy so they lowball me on the Z so when I'm left alone in the waiting area I buy a 60 day subscription to carfax and run it myself... Sure enough it says it right there, But the kicker... in the notes of the incident "Carfax began following this incident 10/20/15".

After some hysterically high and low numbers were thrown around I leave in my Z again but not before the manager tells me they put the car on the lift and found frame damage that he was obligated by law to inform me of the findings... I'm already steaming from the carfax so now I'm pissed.

On the way out I called carmax to speak with a manager who wasn't in...

-November 4th... I write on carmax's facebook wall
Quote:

"Last February I purchased a 2009 Nissan 370Z with 25K miles for $25K, Recently I started playing with just the idea of getting something bigger... I got it appraised with carmax in modesto on Sunday October 1st for $17K but didn't feel that was good enough for me to warrant getting rid of it. But I wanted to get a 2nd opinion and see some numbers on a 4Runner at a local Toyota dealership. I went in and when they ran the carfax on my car... Accident reported in 2009 (says it wasn't reported until October 2015, 8 months after buying this car), I bought my 370Z under the impression it was a "CQC" car and I even made the modesto carmax rectify every problem I had with the car which was in itself a pain in the butt to do... The toyota dealership put the 370z on the lift and found previous frame damage. Needless to say, I was lied to believing that there was no previous accidents yet alone any frame damage... I wasted my time and money on this car and I'm stuck doing so now"
I get a response from carmax
Quote:

"Hi Alan, thank you for sharing these details surrounding your experience with our Modesto location, as well as your 370Z. At CarMax, we guarantee that there is no existing, or previous, frame or flood damage on any vehicle that is on our lot. Obviously this is something that we would like to look into a bit deeper and learn more about. Would you please provide your phone number and any further details that may assist with our research via a private message? We are eager to get involved. - Curt, Your Customer Care Team"
I responded
Quote:

On 2/23/15 I went to the Fairfield Carmax and purchased a "CQC" 2009 Nissan 370Z with 24k miles for $25k with a squeeky clean carfax... Immediately had issues with tire pressure sensor, headlight, body scrapes, misaligned bumper and a bunch of missing clips. I had most of it repaired through the Modesto carmax on 3/25/15 and 4/02/15 with the rocker panel scrape apparently in "CQC" spec... I accepted that as the lady helping me (Shauna) was very kind...

I began to play with the idea of getting a bigger car. recently and went to the Modesto Carmax to get an appraisal and was given a $17k appraisal on 11/1/15. I wasn't interested after all. But a SUV on the lot caught my attention and after some research a new one only runs $1k more. So I went to Livermore Toyota yesterday on 11/3/15 and to my dismay, when they ran the Carfax on the 370Z a accident was reported as taking place on 10/8/2009 but Carfax says at the bottom they began reporting it 10/20/2015... 8 months after I bought the car. It explains why paint has began to peel on the bumper and its missing a Vin sticker. Then the techs at the Toyota took the car in and put it on a lift and found Frame damage... I have an appointment at 3PM to get it inspected by a body shop and intend on going to carmax to speak with a manager before I start seeking an attorney and filing complaints with the DMV, BBB and dealership inspector for the area.

I Dont feel safe driving this already small car that I'm still paying for and I feel deceived that I was lead to believe it was a perfectly safe car with the 125+ point inspection and spotless Carfax. This was our 3rd carmax car and wasn't going to be our last...

I was asked to give my contact info its (***)***-****
They replied
Quote:

Hi Alan, thank you for this additional information. I work alongside Curt in our Customer Relations team, and as Curt mentioned, we are eager to look into this situation for you. We will be doing some further research and partnership with our store management team, and as soon as we have some more information about next steps we will reach back out to you. Thank you again for the opportunity to look into this. - Jen
And later
Quote:

Hey Alan, I have notified our management team in Modesto of this and will continue to connect with them to see how we can look into this. If I receive any updates, I will certainly reach back out to you. - Curt
-At this point I've made an appointment for a visual inspection with Cooks collision repair in Tracy at 3PM
-- 2:40PM I get a call from "Francis" at Carmax who is the service department manager and asks me to bring the car in so they can check it for frame damage... I agree, I will after I get this place to check out.

- Cooks finds no frame damage fortunately but points out that there's clear indications of a left front hit... Bumper cover is aftermarket, fender has been repaired and repainted, Hood has been replaced, headlight wasn't OEM, bumper reinforcement bar was cracked on the right side and the bumper foam was held together with tape.

- I take it to carmax and bring my mother as a witness and to be the voice of reason as I'm very calm and emotionless.
-- They put it on a lift and the mechanic with the manager watching explains to me what they're looking for, starting at the rear... He reaches behind the bumper cover and says "we check the bumper support bar for any visible signs of dents or cracks" where I pointed out the front is cracked... He shoots over to the front and unbolts the splash guard and I point to the crack... They mumble to each other and he keeps going along with the inspection and finds nothing out of the ordinary.

Our conversation went back and fourth, They kept quoting their guarantee is for frame or flood damage. While I point out that they did a "125+ point inspection" which checks for these kind of things, That the guy who did the "125+ point inspection" over looked the paint peeling off the bumper, missing vin sticker, missing brackets I had to get them to replace, the over spray and dust in the paint on the hood and fender, the non OEM headlight and bumper cover and the cracked support beam... He offered to replace the bumper support but nothing else.

My mom started off pissed, then we traded and I got pissed and loud for the first time in my life... They offered nothing to do about the now tarnished carfax or an explanation how they overlooked the clear signs of damage and he incriminated himself by saying that they bought a Porsche Boxster from auction that passed everything they do with flying colors only for a service writer to recognize the car from his last job as having the entire front end including parts of the frame repaired. but they couldn't tell before they had the car on their lot being sold to someone else who got their money back.

As of this time, the guy "Francis" left it at "we'll just fix the bumper support" but offered nothing on the carfax despite me explaining... I was told and showed that I purchased a squeeky clean car and paid full non previous wrecked price for it... I am supposed to get a call from a sales manager tomorrow and I left a message to the people on carmax's facebook

Quote:

I went and got the car checked out at a body shop, they found signs of previous damage in the fender, bumper and hood and missing parts but also found cracks in the bumper reinforcement support... I bought the car being told it had no prior accident and a clean Carfax while clearly that wasn't the case... The CQC inspector failed to identify the clear signs and I paid full price for a non wrecked car that I believed to have had a clean past with faith in the 125+ point inspection. I'm done with the car and just want the car out of my name with the deposit I put on it to go towards another car, I Dont care if another carmax car or from somewhere else. Im willing to overlook $3k in improvements, critical repairs and maintenance. The car was a lie given by a carmax employee and has left me stranded multiple times in the 13k miles I've had it. The car max employee "Francis" couldn't/didn't offer any resolution, compensation or solution to the problem with the Carfax. As of right now I'm extremely disappointed that this is our 3rd carmax car, that I trusted this company to offer more security than a private seller and whole heartedly regret my decision... I hope a resolution or solution can be met without much further action.
I have been getting messages from my friends on facebooks referring me to their attorneys who cover this sort of thing aswell as a friend who works at the DMV there who told me to file a complaint with their investigation department and the BBB. I'll also send this to the local news outlets if nothing will be done to rectify the problem... I just want the car out of my name and my deposit back at this point, I wasnt going to be heart broken if I had to keep the car until finding out it was in an accident.

tWeEzY 11-05-2015 01:25 AM

Its these types of headaches that make me sometimes want to shell out extra for a new car just to have a piece of mind because you never know what happened to the vehicle in the hands of a previous owner.

DEpointfive0 11-05-2015 02:18 AM

Sorry for all that pain in the ***, hire a lawyer.

And this is why I call CarFax CarFucks, because it's 100% bullshít.

Z_ealot 11-05-2015 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEpointfive0 (Post 3341397)
Sorry for all that pain in the ***, hire a lawyer.

And this is why I call CarFax CarFucks, because it's 100% bullshít.

Exactly why i had my Z inspected after i picked it up, fortunately i got lucky as far as having no damage....i dont care what a report says, i still have cars inspected after i pick them up

JARblue 11-05-2015 09:09 AM

Criminals :shakes head:

Hope you get made whole again :tiphat:

6spd 11-05-2015 09:51 AM

Gotta get a lawyer. Then gotta hope you have a written record of the "clean" carfax report and the vehicle being sold as "accident free". Then gotta hope there isn't some statute of limitations for claims of this type, ie buying, in good faith, under false pretenses. Then let the lawyer do their job and get to work for you.

GZ3 11-05-2015 09:53 AM

carmax is the worst auto dealer you can ever go too

zmanelite 11-05-2015 10:13 AM

Fook man this sucks

GraphiteZ 11-05-2015 10:24 AM

That sucks. Hope things will work out for you. From my understanding, a clean Carfax report simply means no insurance paid repairs. You can have your car repaired multiple times and as long as you pay out of your pocket, it won't be on the report.

Trips 11-05-2015 10:27 AM

Wow! What a mess.

I hope it all gets sorted out one way or another.

BamBamZ 11-05-2015 11:02 AM

Thanks everyone, I have info on 3 lawyers that specialize in this kind of thing.. Auto check which is what carmax uses comes up clean while Carfax shows an accident...

Here's a message I got this morning

Quote:

Good morning Alan, thanks so much for this update and for keeping us in the loop with the info on the body shop inspection. We were in communication with our management team in Modesto who informed us that they wanted to inspect the vehicle for the frame damage you mentioned as well. I understand that you did speak with our management team on this yesterday. Please let me know any further questions you may have on the resolution as I know our Modesto team was eager to connect further. - Curt
And my response
Quote:

They looked at it, admitting they could tell it was in a right front impact and that it was obvious I didn't cause the cracks in the bumper reinforcement beam as the front end was still intact except for the missing parts I know about now. The mechanic started off by saying they look for cracks or dents in the bumper reinforcement bar as soon as he got the car on the lift and was showing me what to check for, to where I pointed out the cracks in the front... The guy "Francis" told us about a Porsche Boxster they just sold that had a major front end hit but they couldn't tell because how well the impact was repaired, but that a service tech recognized the car from his previous job, so they had to buy it back although they couldn't tell everything firewall forward was replaced... Since my cars accident took place 6 years ago with less than 8k miles I wouldn't be surprised if the right front suspension was all replaced but we wouldn't be able to tell because at 8k miles the undercarriage is still clean... He also said its common to sell previously wrecked cars without knowing of it... But ultimately. All he offered was to replace the bumper reinforcement bar... But that he wasn't part of sales or anything other than the service department so he offered no real resolution to the problem of me buying a car with the lie it had a clean history of no prior accidents.
If I buy another used car I'm definitely having it inspected in and out by my mechanic.

njobe89 11-05-2015 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GZ3 (Post 3341573)
carmax is the worst auto dealer you can ever go too

:iagree:

this will be a hard thing to win. carfax isn't always updated and some things get reported later. they (whoever fixed the car the first time) probably didn't report it till it showed up on carfax. when i had my car, i had the side hit and had the door replaced, it was private property and no police was involved and it never showed up on carfax. however, i ended up rear ending a car going 5mph and got spider web cracks in my paint on the front bumber, it was on the road. i got a ticket and it showed up on carfax as front end damage.

you may be able to win something here, but you will waste a lot of time and money for the lawyer.

i honestly don't know what i would do in the scenario that you are in.

Bshields22 11-05-2015 01:29 PM

:mad:

kenchan 11-05-2015 01:34 PM

at this point i would just hang low and sell the car at $17K unless u want to keep the Z.

why bother announcing u have a problem car? the whole purpose of selling a damaged car is to fix it and sell it BEFORE it shows up on carfax. :D

BamBamZ 11-05-2015 04:51 PM

They do their "125+ point inspection" on every car sold on the lot, if performed as they described they would of saw the repair work and cracked bumper support...

It will be a hard win but its not impossible... If they stop helping (so far the people who manage their facebook have been great). I'll have to get local media involved, write yelp reviews, get the DMV involved, BBB and whoever can do something... Then get the attorney(s) referred to me.

I owe $16k on it, after taxes, APR etc... Is factored in it was $28k. I like honesty...

BamBamZ 11-05-2015 04:56 PM

On a humorous note, the guy I saw last night at carmax said 2 things dinged the appraisal... The short shifter and "RPM thing". I didn't do anything besides wheel spacers, twm shifter and knob... So I asked what "RPM thing?" He didn't know as he wasn't the appraiser, I thought for a second he was talking about the shift light in the cluster and I said that was stock... Then just now realized I think he was talking about the rev match thing. Apparently that's a mod that devalues the car ��

DavidZ370 11-05-2015 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 3341706)
at this point i would just hang low and sell the car at $17K unless u want to keep the Z.

why bother announcing u have a problem car? the whole purpose of selling a damaged car is to fix it and sell it BEFORE it shows up on carfax. :D

scumbag kenchan :icon14:

BamBamZ 11-05-2015 08:12 PM

Didn't get much today... The Facebook people tried to reach out to "senior" management for modesto and didn't get anything back, or at least what they said to me...

Edit: forgot to add this
I said first
Quote:

They looked at it, admitting they could tell it was in a right front impact and that it was obvious I didn't cause the cracks in the bumper reinforcement beam as the front end was still intact except for the missing parts I know about now. The mechanic started off by saying they look for cracks or dents in the bumper reinforcement bar as soon as he got the car on the lift and was showing me what to check for, to where I pointed out the cracks in the front... The guy "Francis" told us about a Porsche Boxster they just sold that had a major front end hit but they couldn't tell because how well the impact was repaired, but that a service tech recognized the car from his previous job, so they had to buy it back although they couldn't tell everything firewall forward was replaced... Since my cars accident took place 6 years ago with less than 8k miles I wouldn't be surprised if the right front suspension was all replaced but we wouldn't be able to tell because at 8k miles the undercarriage is still clean... He also said its common to sell previously wrecked cars without knowing of it... But ultimately. All he offered was to replace the bumper reinforcement bar... But that he wasn't part of sales or anything other than the service department so he offered no real resolution to the problem of me buying a car with the lie it had a clean history of no prior accidents.
Their response
Quote:

Hey Alan, I attempted to connect further with the senior management team in Modesto this afternoon to gain some more insight into the situation from the store's perspective. I do not have any specific updates as of yet, but as soon as I'm able to discuss this with the team, I will follow up with you on any info that I'm able to discover. - Curt
I just said thanks and got
Quote:

You bet Alan, thanks for giving us the chance to look into it and for your patience.

SwissCheese 11-05-2015 10:07 PM

Seems like good CS from the FB team. Hopefully you can get this all worked out!

LA370z 11-06-2015 10:39 AM

Reading this is very disappointing. I've had nothing but a good experience dealing with CarMax thus far. This experience that you have had may very well impact my future business with this company.

Thanks for the heads up and hope all of your issues get resolved quickly.

njobe89 11-06-2015 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LA370z (Post 3342289)
Reading this is very disappointing. I've had nothing but a good experience dealing with CarMax thus far. This experience that you have had may very well impact my future business with this company.

Thanks for the heads up and hope all of your issues get resolved quickly.

i think you're a 1% lol

we bought a car at carmax for my mom and she was getting off an exit and the breaks failed. not sure how they stay in business. i know i'd never buy anything from them.

LA370z 11-06-2015 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njobe89 (Post 3342290)
i think you're a 1% lol

we bought a car at carmax for my mom and she was getting off an exit and the breaks failed. not sure how they stay in business. i know i'd never buy anything from them.

Damn...... I've been lucky I guess. My Z is a 2014 and had less than 9k miles on it when I bought it back in May. (knock on wood)

BamBamZ 11-06-2015 11:34 AM

This is carmax car #2 of 3... We also have a 2009 BMW 328I (bought 4 days after I got my Z with 50k miles, it now has 57k) that's been a total piece of crap. It spent the first 4 weeks at carmax after we got it for a bad oil leak, the first fix was to use silicone sealant around the oil pan to stop the leaking... It worked for a day, its at the shop as we speak for a misfire...

The other one was the 2007 Toyota Tacoma X-Runner with 40k (october 2011)I traded in for my Z... Never had an issue with that truck, had it for 5 years and put 85k miles on it.

JARblue 11-06-2015 11:45 AM

Toyota vs BMW :twocents:

The situation with your Z is just effed though...

Davey 11-06-2015 12:58 PM

Honestly, I'm not sure why anyone buys from them. What's the appeal? :confused:

BamBamZ 11-06-2015 02:26 PM

I asked for an update this morning and got

Quote:

Hey Alan, thanks for reaching back today on your concerns. I was in touch with the team in Modesto on this morning. I know Francis worked with you as well on this, but upon inspection we found a cracked impact bar, which is actually not an indicator of frame damage. While we never want any customer to receive negative information on a vehicle at any time, we cannot guarantee that a vehicle has not been in an accident. It does appear that an accident was listed on the CarFax report in October of 2015, however we stand by our guarantee of no frame or flood damage. With that said, we still want to ensure your satisfaction and will gladly cover any cost associated with the parts of the impact bar in question. We would also be happy to connect with a body shop of your choice to look into those repairs if you wish. Regarding your appraisal offer you mentioned, the accident listed on the CarFax did not influence the amount we delivered on your offer, but rather there were several other factors which contributed to the amount we presented. If I can assist with any other questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know. – Curt, Your Customer Care Team
I responded with
Quote:

So its okay I was told specifically at time of buying a car for $28k that it had never been in an accident, and it later having been in one. That I have to take the depreciated value now because your 125+ point inspection failed to see all the signs?. That makes the inspection pointless and a bold face lie and buying from you guys a gamble like any private party... If the inspection was done correctly it would of been caught. It took a body shop and your techs no more than 10 minutes to see it was wrecked, but your sales staff told me it wasn't when I bought the car.
I sent links to here and yelp and
Quote:

i was hoping I could end the ongoing story with "a mistake was made, but they owned up to it and made it right"
And just got
Quote:

Alan, upon completing my research on the vehicle, we completed a certified quality inspection prior to the sale, which guarantees that there was no frame or flood damage. We stand by that guarantee and want to ensure that your concerns here are addressed. That is why we offered to cover the parts associated with the repair. Additionally, we feel the offer made is the most competitive available on the vehicle, and none of the CarFax information you mention was factored into that offer. We appreciate you giving us the chance to look into it and if either myself or our Modesto team can serve any further assistance, please feel free to let us know. - Curt
I'll update with my response.

BamBamZ 11-06-2015 02:39 PM

My responses
Quote:

If a cracked support is CQC quality and all the receipts I have for the missing chunk in the headlight and bumper brackets that I was told by Shauna there wasn't in "CQC spec" and was later repaired by carmax (still have receipt) was in spec at time of inspection then it is obvious it was not done properly and a lot of things were over looked. There's still the fact I was lead to believing by the sales lady at the Fairfield carmax that the car had no previous accidents... If I would of known of it I wouldn't be paying $28k for the car that to anywhere else now is worthless.
Quote:

And those "factored" appraisal issues... Francis said the guy who did the appraisal mentioned something with the RPM. I didn't touch anything but wheel spacers (comes right off) and short shifter... The short shifter does nothing to the RPMs. He's talking about the S-Mode (synchro rev match) that all sports packaged 370Z's have... It blips the RPMs to the right number every time you down shift so its smooth and precise shifting. Its factory and has a button to turn it off...

Zipper 104 11-06-2015 03:25 PM

No lawyer
 
IMO, not that you're asking, is you need to decide right now whether you're going to use a lawyer or not. Now.
The first thing a lawyer would do is tell you to stop talking to them and let them do their thing. You've done too much of the 'trying to resolve this on your own' thing already. It's pretty clear at this point they're now just starting to dog you. This will continue until you give up in frustration. They'll simply out wait you. Either get a lawyer or get serious with your plans on turning up the heat using the media.


I hate hearing these kinds of stories and I really wish you the best of luck resolving this one to your satisfaction. I really do. This would eat me to the point of impacting my health.

104

Davey 11-06-2015 03:32 PM

$17000 is actually a pretty fair price for your car.

<- Shill for CarMax

Davey 11-06-2015 03:33 PM

Why not just take the $17000 trade-in for the car? :confused:

How much more than that do you think it's worth?

BamBamZ 11-06-2015 04:05 PM

They said
Quote:

I can certainly understand that frustration and your hesitation with that, Alan. That is precisely why we want to take the opportunity to address the repairs and complete the service so that we can prove that we stand by our vehicles. - Curt
I said
Quote:

That doesn't fix the Carfax and that your staff lied to me when I bought the car.
They said
Quote:

We take great pride in being completely transparent to our customers with all the information we possess on the vehicle. We did that with the AutoCheck report and guarantee the no frame or flood damage like I mentioned. I cannot speak to what may or may not have been present on the CarFax, but I feel great about the efforts our Modesto team made to address this situation properly in recognizing and trying to resolve your concerns. - Curt
I said
Quote:

I can tell we won't see eye to eye on this and I'm not giving up so easily. Have a good day.
they said
Quote:

Thanks, Alan, I hope you do the same. I'm disappointed that we weren't able to bring you the resolution you hoped for. Hope that you have a nice weekend. - Curt
I've reached out to Fox40 news and sent a transcript of events to a few attorneys that were referred to me...

One of which having a neat little video.

http://gwpconnectvideos.com/?rid=73&uid=664

I'll probably stop updating this with thorough details as to what goes on now as I'm sure the lawyer would tell me to stop...

And Davey, For that amount I was just going to keep the car... Until I found it had a screwed up carfax. I paid full price for a non wrecked car and got a wrecked car after all.

GSS138 11-06-2015 05:38 PM

Ya know, even if it the A-hole manager would have said something like"Man dude we ****** up, how can we reimburse you? What's your price?" Would have been better than the snive little corporate "I'm a ******* know-it-all-***-fucker" attitude in his emails.

BamBamZ 11-06-2015 05:57 PM

Legally now, I can't say what I would settle for although its already been said, but now its going to cost them a bit more and legal fees.

Davey 11-06-2015 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BamBamZ (Post 3342543)

And Davey, For that amount I was just going to keep the car... Until I found it had a screwed up carfax. I paid full price for a non wrecked car and got a wrecked car after all.

OK but first of all, based on my quick check, $17K is what the car is worth, according to KBB and NADA, on average. I put in a 2009 Sport+touring with every option and 50K miles and even Excellent condition is only $900 more than they offered, and they NEVER will give you "Excellent." "Very good" is roughly $17,000. Is your car exceptionally low mileage or something? If so, it could be worth another $1000to $1500 more, roughly. So we're not talking about thousands and thousands of dollars you are out here, right?

Second, never have any faith in the dealer's inspection process. I learned that the hard way. I bought a "certified used" car and I had the same experience you did - it was wrecked, didn't show up on the Carfax, but once I thoroughly looked the car over, I could see it. I returned the car and was offered every dime I paid for it in trade on a different car, taxes included. I was happy with that, because I was not out any money.

They do not invest any time, effort, or money into the "inspection" beyond if it has some life left in the brake pads and the tires are not bald/no holes in the block. It's a joke. And the guys who do them do 10+ a day and they're not any kind of experts in anything.

So, next time, have a mechanic look at the car.

I wish you the best of luck in getting whatever diminished value you are out, but given the age of the car, I don't think you'll get a whole lot. :tup:

BamBamZ 11-06-2015 08:29 PM

I'm not going for diminished value... I'm going for them to buy the car back from me for what I bought it for from them just 8 months/13K miles ago (37K now). Which is $28,871.63 and then some because now I have to go the legal route and will reach for every penny the attorney says I can probably get back (totaling $32,050.73 for what I have receipts for)

Davey 11-07-2015 07:11 AM

:confused:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BamBamZ (Post 3342727)
I'm not going for diminished value... I'm going for them to buy the car back from me for what I bought it for from them just 8 months/13K miles ago (37K now). Which is $28,871.63 and then some because now I have to go the legal route and will reach for every penny the attorney says I can probably get back (totaling $32,050.73 for what I have receipts for)

Oh, I thought you bought the car in 2009, since that's what you posted...

Quote:

Originally Posted by BamBamZ (Post 3341385)

-February 2009, I purchased the 2009 370Z Sport/Touring/Nav 6spd for $25K ($29K after everything was said and done, but put a $11K down payment)


... and since the price you paid made sense for a 2009 purchase. That wasn't a very good deal for last year. Also 2 CSC's in one year? On your dime? I also assumed that was over 5 years or so, but man, I guess you can't catch a break with this car, that sucks.

Anyway, you made the mistake of believing the 125 point inspection BS guaranteed you a car with no accident damage, now I hope you're not making the same mistake with the lawyer, because I think it's a stretch to say you'll get the full purchase price plus your maintenance expenses, etc. especially considering you did actually use the car for 13,000 miles. Remember, people selling you stuff lie. It's 100% guaranteed in life... I hope he's working on contingency.

BamBamZ 11-07-2015 06:38 PM

whoops... fixed that mistake. I've had it less than a year... And no it wasn't a very good deal to begin with. I have a warranty so I paid the $300 deductible the first time and the shop warranties the 2nd time so it didn't cost me.

I did make the mistake believing their "125+ point inspection". I'll take whatever I can get pretty much, It'll if anything settle out of court.

loiro370z 11-07-2015 07:01 PM

Get in touch with jalopnik.com.;)

LA370z 11-07-2015 07:53 PM

Even though they are not giving/offering you what you're expecting right now, they are attempting to work with so far. Most wouldn't even deal with it until it made it to court.

BamBamZ 11-07-2015 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loiro370z (Post 3343189)
Get in touch with jalopnik.com.;)

Sent them a message last night...

And carmax stopped working with me when they concluded they won't do anything more than to replace the cracked bumper support.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2