![]() |
Quote:
For conceal carry laws the USCCA is a great resource. They tend to have the most up to date info (VA was updated 4-20-2020) and they make it easy to understand. I have the web address for their reciprocity and law map saved on all my devices for quick reference. USCCA CCW Reciprocity Map Go over the info on USCCA and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask! :tup: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
My in-laws live there and we visit them every summer, so I’m familiar with the traffic laws. I’m only going to be in VA for about 10 miles of our trip. They live on the NC/VA border. I’m not really concerned with actually carrying, but I don’t want to drive halfway across the country without a way to protect my family. Normally we fly, but with this Covid BS we are likely to drive this year. |
Quote:
Thanks for the link. If I do carry in these other states I’ll have to familiarize myself with signage requirements. Texas is black and white. If the actual wording of the law is not placed visibly in 1” block letters at the entrance in both English and Spanish, then it doesn’t apply. |
Here is the ruling from Judge Benitez regarding the Ammo background check in California. He pretty much destroyed the law as written by using....surprise... common sense. Hopefully they wont put a stay on this ruling while it goes through appeals.
https://michellawyers.com/wp-content...anting-MPI.pdf. If anyone is familiar with the law process, please correct me in my understanding of the appeals. 1. California can take it up to the 9th circuit 2. In the 9th ckt, it goes through a 3 judge panel to review Judge Benitez decision At this point, what would determine the case to go to an 11 judge panel? Also, if it goes to the 11 judges, their decision becomes law for all states that fall under the 9th circuit courts jurisdiction. Does this go both ways? If they decide to uphold the ammo background check will it apply to the other states as well? |
Quote:
Regardless of which way the ruling goes, it will not be "law". The motion at hand was for a preliminary injunction to prevent the state from enforcing this law, due to the likelihood of immediate and irreparable injury to the plaintiffs, until the case can be heard on the merits and a ruling made on the constitutionality of the law. Regardless of how the case goes, it will only apply to CA. However, it will become case law and thus dispositive in any future suits regarding future laws of the same nature passed by other states in the 9th Circuit. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Immediate and irreparable injury to the plaintifs... Theres a section in Judge Benitez's ruling that mentions "injury" to the plaintiffs. Makes sense. :tup: |
These tags tho :rofl2:
|
Quote:
|
Something to talk about.
What do you guys think of the IWI Tavor TS12 shotgun? I love bullpups, big fan of the Tavor rifles, and this is the first bullpup shot gun I'm excited about. Initially I didn't like it but now after seeing it in action I'm liking it a lot. |
Rusty, do you load for 44 Mag? I've got some brass here I'll bring with me in July.
|
Quote:
What kind of bullets you want. Jacketed, you supply. I have cast with gas checks. 225gr and 240gr SWC's. I drive these as hard as a jacketed bullet without leading the barrel. :tup: The gas check makes a big difference. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Off the top of my head: 35 Remington 32 ACP 25 ACP (maybe) I'll compile a list of caliber & quantity. I also have some factory 270 that the previous owner of the house left. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2