![]() |
what? if your wondering about the numbers i live in Australia and we use a different measurement, but i converted it for all you Americans. also the redline is from a completely stock dyno run.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
it might be because my A/F ratio is screwed. here the dyno with A?R ratio on it let me know what you think?
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg688...jpg&res=medium once again redline is the stock run and blue line is after the mods were done |
You're AFR seems fine. The stock setup runs a bit rich so you leaned it out (but not in an unsafe way)
|
i was actually kinda curious about that 295 torque
|
Quote:
|
yeah i noticed my torque for some reason is a lot higher than everyone else, i don't know why. even my stock dyno run it was really high and these 2 runs (stock and after mods) were done months apart. also we did the dyno in gear 4 is that right? if it matter i have a 7 spd auto
|
I even rechecked the conversion chart on that one myself.
|
any guesses on why mine is?
|
I think for 7AT run it in 5th. Someone correct if im wrong
|
Yes, that is correct. 5th for 7AT.
|
might be why my hp is low
|
Quote:
|
There's a guy in the south Florida Z club that did a 09+ nismo S-tune exhaust with a certain brand hfc and the injen cai's, and after uprev (done by Gus at hp logic) he hit like 305hp and 304tq. Not the exact numbers, but I remember that they were almost equal, within 5 of each other, and his numbers were just over 300hp and tq. From what Gus said, he somehow found that magic combination that was the perfect balance of back pressure/ free flow. He could probably explain this a lot better than me since I was hearing it second hand from the owner of the Z. But this isn't the first I've heard of numbers like these.
Sent from my iPizzle using magic and new fangled science stuff |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2