Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   Is it really worth putting a Cold Air Intake on 370z and what HP gains (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/48440-really-worth-putting-cold-air-intake-370z-what-hp-gains.html)

gsxr750 01-25-2012 09:23 PM

Look at the old test results by motor trend with 370z base model vs. the 370z nismo and even with the extra hp the nismo had, it performed worse than the older 370z base model. So I really doubt if a 5-10hp increase your driving experience that much from a CAI or airfilter change.

brucelidat 01-25-2012 09:33 PM

I doubt you'll feel much of a difference, but a lot of small gains can add up to a decent diff. If you're already dropping for a CBE and HCFs like a lot of people here, then K&N drop ins and the post MAF tubes are a relatively cheap mod that can just help add to the overall airflow package. Also considering that modding is sort of addicitng and most would also be considering the gen 3 CAI, this option most much less and seems to net gains close to the CAI according to what many on here say. And, hey if you mentally think it feels faster, that's pretty much worth it, haha. You're as fast as you feel. Too each their own. Also, the K&Ns last quite a while, 50k miles or whatever so they're not too pricey relative to OEMs in that regard. Anyhow, I didn't really read through the last few really long posts. Basically, it seem liek they make a difference which might not noticeable, but aren't very expensive so whatever floats your boat.

bigdog1250 01-25-2012 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z_ealot (Post 1507914)
i don't know about the sound on the FI CBE, but the exhaust i eventually wanted to go after later on down the road was the Powerhouse Amuse R1 titan exhaust, that thing sounds amazing and is light as hell to boot. from what i hear a gain of around 20whp can be had with the amuse exhaust, but it is pretty expensive.

Have you ever heard the FI exhaust in person? It's freakin' ridiculous

brucelidat 01-25-2012 10:08 PM

There's a reason there's a 2-3 month wait. :tup:

Skeeterbop 01-26-2012 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750 (Post 1509467)
Look at the old test results by motor trend with 370z base model vs. the 370z nismo and even with the extra hp the nismo had, it performed worse than the older 370z base model. So I really doubt if a 5-10hp increase your driving experience that much from a CAI or airfilter change.

It wasn't due to the air filter/exhaust though. I'm with Z_ealot, I'm going to agree to disagree. It looks like you are trying to convince everyone that your way is best, to each their own i say. If you don't want an aftermarket filter fine, but your opinions aren't going to change my mind. I'm almost at the point of saying we are being trolled.

elmz 01-26-2012 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skeeterbop (Post 1509890)
If you don't want an aftermarket filter fine, but your opinions aren't going to change my mind. I'm almost at the point of saying we are being trolled.

+1 You gotta take some of the things people are saying here into consideration. Is it that hard to believe that technology has improved and that "real" research and development were invested into creating these after market filters? The end result is a filter with increased air flow and better filtration.

Cmike2780 01-26-2012 11:19 AM

Moot arguement. HP numbers are for bragging rights anyways. I'd buy a CAI because of the sound and it looks shiny under the hood. Same goes for the exhaust. If I gain a few ponies, awesome! If not, still awesome because it sounds cool.

As far as reusable filter filtration and dirt going into the engine, the amount is negligible over paper filters. Each type has it's pro's and cons. The oem paper work great as long as you replace them on schedule and don't allow them to get excessively dirty. They tend to be loose effectiveness abruptly near the end of their life. It's a no brainer to just keep using these if you don't really care about a few more hp's and that's fine. Part of the fun of modifying though, is to pick up every hp you can. It's a trade off that some are willing to risk, while others, such as the OP aren't. To each his own.

batman_4 01-26-2012 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skeeterbop (Post 1509890)
It wasn't due to the air filter/exhaust though. I'm with Z_ealot, I'm going to agree to disagree. It looks like you are trying to convince everyone that your way is best, to each their own i say. If you don't want an aftermarket filter fine, but your opinions aren't going to change my mind. I'm almost at the point of saying we are being trolled.

:werd:

gbrettin 01-26-2012 11:57 AM

It's interesting seeing the pro/con views in this thread. Worth the read imo.

gsxr750 01-26-2012 12:57 PM

I 'm using the motor trend nismo to the base model comparisin , to show what little effect a marginal HP increase, in this case none.

Dyno runs are one thing to show performance and I would agree that a 50-100 hp increase would definitly be felt by the driver, but with the marginal 5-10HP from an intake kit, it may not even provide any better numbers than stock if it were tested on the street for 0-60 , 1/4 mile and top end. Test results may even prove worse.

Another thing to point out is that once a modification has been made to the exhaust or intake, the engine requires a new engine map to installed by either a laptop with a proven map for your specific geographical location or a manually adjusted map, calibrated with a dyno and a laptop. In order to take full advantage of the mods.

I know the ECM will relearn itself, as you drive it , but it will not optimize for the best peformance possible, when compared to a dyno/mapping adjustment.

Cmike2780 01-26-2012 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750 (Post 1510389)
I 'm using the motor trend nismo to the base model comparisin , to show what little effect a marginal HP increase, in this case none.

Dyno runs are one thing to show performance and I would agree that a 50-100 hp increase would definitly be felt by the driver, but with the marginal 5-10HP from an intake kit, it may not even provide any better numbers than stock if it were tested on the street for 0-60 , 1/4 mile and top end. Test results may even prove worse.

Another thing to point out is that once a modification has been made to the exhaust or intake, the engine requires a new engine map to installed by either a laptop with a proven map for your specific geographical location or a manually adjusted map, calibrated with a dyno and a laptop. In order to take full advantage of the mods.

I know the ECM will relearn itself, as you drive it , but it will not optimize for the best peformance possible, when compared to a dyno/mapping adjustment.

You are correct, and often times, that's exactly what most people do. Get an UpRev tune to adjust the A/F ratios once all the bolt on's a done. Aside from the exhaust, this is where the Nismo picked up a few more ponies over the regular Z, the tune. For just an intake though, its not really necessary because the ECM can compensate for the increased air flow within the stock maps. It's around $500-$600 for the initial UpRev license.

Strangler 01-26-2012 03:03 PM

Does anyone that has an aftermarket intake have any "Bogging" problems so far?

Pelican170 01-26-2012 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750 (Post 1510389)
I 'm using the motor trend nismo to the base model comparisin , to show what little effect a marginal HP increase, in this case none.

Dyno runs are one thing to show performance and I would agree that a 50-100 hp increase would definitly be felt by the driver, but with the marginal 5-10HP from an intake kit, it may not even provide any better numbers than stock if it were tested on the street for 0-60 , 1/4 mile and top end. Test results may even prove worse.

Another thing to point out is that once a modification has been made to the exhaust or intake, the engine requires a new engine map to installed by either a laptop with a proven map for your specific geographical location or a manually adjusted map, calibrated with a dyno and a laptop. In order to take full advantage of the mods.

I know the ECM will relearn itself, as you drive it , but it will not optimize for the best peformance possible, when compared to a dyno/mapping adjustment.

I think motortrend is maybe the only place that has numbers like that. Everything else ive ever seen shows them even... Besides, I dont think motortrends numbers are on point with most thing from what ive heard...

If motortrend gave the nismo a 4.6 0-60, what did it give the base model for numbers?

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...o_370z_review/

This shows the non nismo at 4.7...
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...0z_first_test/

lol1234 01-26-2012 06:06 PM

intake bad 4 u

make engine no happy

chuckd05 01-27-2012 12:29 AM

with all the money i put into my Z

CAI, Long tube headers, the G3 CAI, 4.08 final drive, uprev tune... costing me close to 4k id imagine, i wish i didnt spend a penny and purchased a SCer or Turbo, I would of still had the car...

but if you are modding it, i say test pipes and tune are the two things that help the most

Pelican170 01-27-2012 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckd05 (Post 1511571)
with all the money i put into my Z

CAI, Long tube headers, the G3 CAI, 4.08 final drive, uprev tune... costing me close to 4k id imagine, i wish i didnt spend a penny and purchased a SCer or Turbo, I would of still had the car...

but if you are modding it, i say test pipes and tune are the two things that help the most

Yea, but those mods will cost way more than 4 grand total...

brucelidat 01-27-2012 11:49 AM

I agree, both SC and TT cost way more than 4k. What happened to your Z and why would having FI cause you to still have it?

sfearl1 01-27-2012 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucelidat (Post 1512118)
I agree, both SC and TT cost way more than 4k. What happened to your Z and why would having FI cause you to still have it?

i imagine he wasn't happy with his results from the mods he listed

FL 4Motion 01-27-2012 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucelidat (Post 1512118)
I agree, both SC and TT cost way more than 4k. What happened to your Z and why would having FI cause you to still have it?

iirc, he sold it and got a 135i, so easier to pull whp out of a factory FI'd car.

Masa 01-27-2012 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FL 4Motion (Post 1512571)
iirc, he sold it and got a 135i, so easier to pull whp out of a factory FI'd car.

:iagree:

So much easier to squeeze out HP per dollar on a factory FI'd car than it is with a N/A car.

I remember back when I had my GTI VR6, a CAI/CBE/tune would only net me 25hp but the guys with the GTI 1.8 Turbo's with the same mods would be pulling in over 50hp. :mad:

CBRich 01-30-2012 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750
Remember your comparing 1000cc gas powered AIR PUMP to a 5700cc AIR PUMP, which one engine would produce a dirty air filter or restricted air filter, if both engines are stationary using the same airfilter and run in identical outside air conditions and run at the same rpm. Logic would tell you the 5700cc engine would need the airfilter replaced sooner than the 1000cc engine.

Not necessarily true.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750
Another thing to point out is that once a modification has been made to the exhaust or intake, the engine requires a new engine map to installed by either a laptop with a proven map for your specific geographical location or a manually adjusted map, calibrated with a dyno and a laptop. In order to take full advantage of the mods.

Also, not true.

We get it. You don't like aftermarket intakes. You don't think they make enough power. You drove motorcycles. Your warranty will get blowed up if you get an intake. Yeesh! If you don't want one don't buy one.

Sidenote: I also agree that it seems you are trying to force your opinion on others. And you are stating a lot of opinion as fact which is terribly annoying.

alb84z31t 01-30-2012 12:47 PM

The first thing I put into my Z was the pop charger from Jim Wolf. I definitely noticed a difference. I have no idea how much gain I may have received as I have not had it on a dyno yet. But the smoother acceleration itself was a noticeable difference. I have ordered the HFC+ DBE from Fast Intentions, once that's installed, I'll have it dynoed and really see the diff.

vividracing 01-30-2012 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 1510205)
Moot arguement. HP numbers are for bragging rights anyways. I'd buy a CAI because of the sound and it looks shiny under the hood. Same goes for the exhaust. If I gain a few ponies, awesome! If not, still awesome because it sounds cool.

As far as reusable filter filtration and dirt going into the engine, the amount is negligible over paper filters. Each type has it's pro's and cons. The oem paper work great as long as you replace them on schedule and don't allow them to get excessively dirty. They tend to be loose effectiveness abruptly near the end of their life. It's a no brainer to just keep using these if you don't really care about a few more hp's and that's fine. Part of the fun of modifying though, is to pick up every hp you can. It's a trade off that some are willing to risk, while others, such as the OP aren't. To each his own.

You're a ricer :p

This debate is kind of absurd in my opinion. I personally don't bother with intakes, because (call me crazy) I like the look of a stock bay that's been cleaned up. Does that mean I'd try to convince someone not to buy one? Of course not. I actually used to run CAIs on all my cars but I've just decided that on most cars, the stock intakes look good. Oh, and for what it's worth, I just ordered 4 K&N pod filters for my bike.

Dark Sarcasm 01-30-2012 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750 (Post 1502864)

On to the question, do you really think the cold air intakes are really worth the money and do you really get real world HP gains.

One thing a lot of ppl. don't know about these external air filter systems is that while they do flow more air they also tend to let more dirt into your engine. I come from a sport bike background and early sports cars for 30yrs.

What we found out about oiled air filters is that while they may work good when new, after about a year of use on the vehicle they became very dirty and when we cleaned them, we were never able to get them completely clean. What we found was that there was a lot of dirt or grit inside the air filter and we were never able to get rid of it.

If we reinstalled the oiled air filter this dirt would have been sucked directly into the engine. Note we correctly cleaned it from the inside out, as not to allow any dirt into the inside of the air filter.

To play it safe we went back to a stock disposable paper airfilter element.

What a lot of ppl. forget is that the airfilter is meant to protect the engine from dirt and its best to install a new airfilter every few thousands of miles.

Another interesting note is that the use of external air filters style on sport bikes were abandoned, about 15yrs. ago after it was found that they really didn't provide any real hp gains over use of the stock air box and filter.

This was due to the fact that big 4 jap bike manufactures put so much design effort into the tunned intake air tracks on most sport bikes, that most after market air filters actually reduced HP when used.

While a lot of ppl still buy these external and internal oiled filter types on sport bikes, they do so because they really don't know how they work in real life driving environment.

if i am reading that correctly, you already have your personal data from 30 years on bikes and early sports cars to make a decision.

Dark Sarcasm 01-30-2012 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CBRich (Post 1516581)
Not necessarily true.



Also, not true.

We get it. You don't like aftermarket intakes. You don't think they make enough power. You drove motorcycles. Your warranty will get blowed up if you get an intake. Yeesh! If you don't want one don't buy one.

Sidenote: I also agree that it seems you are trying to force your opinion on others. And you are stating a lot of opinion as fact which is terribly annoying.




THANK YOU, I was reading this trying to figure out why the OP was asking "are aftermarket intakes worth it?" and then spelling out 3 reasons why they are not worth it.

I would read his post and go back to the first page to make sure he was the same guy asking the forums opinion!!!

alcheng 02-11-2012 11:01 AM

Just have a quick question, anyone with the CAI installed can tell how it effects the mpg?

Mt Tam I am 02-11-2012 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alcheng (Post 1538147)
Just have a quick question, anyone with the CAI installed can tell how it effects the mpg?

Should not effect MPG except, they sound so cool that you may start wasting gas just to hear the engine note.

UNKNOWN_370 02-11-2012 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckd05 (Post 1511571)
with all the money i put into my Z

CAI, Long tube headers, the G3 CAI, 4.08 final drive, uprev tune... costing me close to 4k id imagine, i wish i didnt spend a penny and purchased a SCer or Turbo, I would of still had the car...

but if you are modding it, i say test pipes and tune are the two things that help the most

That's why I did my brakes first. Now I'm about to do oil cooler and I'm trying to find a good brake duct diy till something solid comes through... the next major will be all to the suspension mod hopefully will be exhaust and TT kit.

These are just performance mods and don't reflect stereo, possible bodykit? and JDM exterior mods.

alcheng 02-11-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mt Tam I am (Post 1538272)
Should not effect MPG except, they sound so cool that you may start wasting gas just to hear the engine note.

I have the K&N drop-in, I found it pulls a bit quicker and smoother especially 4k and up, but I also notice it drains a bit more gas, not much, just want to see how is the CAI, gonna get the short one from K&N soon.

gsxr750 02-11-2012 03:06 PM

if it devlopes more hp than it should get better gas mileage, with more efficient combustion comes better fuel economy. On the older 1980's cars, when you allowed the engine to breath better thru the intake and the exhaust, you usually got better mpg, HP, and 1/4 mile times. This usually meant removing the Cats and resonator on the exhaust, as they really really rob you of power.

BrianMSmith 02-12-2012 07:13 PM

Not worth it, money much better kept in the bank or other investments.

kenchan 02-12-2012 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alcheng (Post 1538147)
Just have a quick question, anyone with the CAI installed can tell how it effects the mpg?

usually it would be on the leaner side until ecu compensates so you would get better mpg... but on the Z i couldn't tell when i had the R2C on. right now im on stock box KN drop-ins and HPS tubes.

on the G consistent 2-3mpg improvement tank to tank. :) heck, when i put the stock intake box on mpg dramatically dropped to about 15-16mpg on surface roads. :icon17:

Speedy 02-14-2012 11:49 AM

Having just bought a Z I've been looking over the forum to see what you guys have found that works. This is a pretty good thread.

One thing to consider is the Z is a MAF based system. It can and will adjust to bolt on mods without a tune. That's why you guys see 20HP gains with CBE or CAI. It is true that it's not cumulative. You may see 18HP from the cat back, or the CAI by itself, but if you add one to the other you won't see 36HP gains. I'd wager 5-10 more only.

My Challenger is MAP based. That means it does NOT adjust for mods. I did in depth testing on that car, and dyno'd it bone stock, bolts on a cat back as it sat on the dyno, dyno'd that, then added a CAI, and dyno'd that. It gained about 12HP TOTAL. The AFR never changed much however. The CAI looked great though.

http://www.speedysgarage.net/challen...par_cai_03.jpg

I later built the motor and added a supercharger. I dyno'd that with the stock air box, then again with a modified CAI to fit. It picked up 30HP and needed a tune tweak to add fuel.

http://www.speedysgarage.net/challen..._covers_13.jpg

I went all out on this Challenger and it's scary fast. For the Z I just want a peppy daily driver and it's been a fun car the past 600 miles.

I've been eyeballing the FI CBE, and looks like going with some drop in filters and air tubes is the best bang for the buck on the intake side.

My goal is to hit 12s in the car at the drag strip eventually without too much money tied up in it.

My car came with a CPO 100K warranty. How is Nissan with cat backs and CAIs regarding that? Dodge like to void everybody's warranty at the drop of a hat. Not like I cared on that car, but on my Z I do since it's my DD.

PaulZ370 02-14-2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianMSmith (Post 1540241)
Not worth it, money much better kept in the bank or other investments.

I couldn't disagree more. I put in the K&N Typhoon's (Short RAM), the Throttle Response has improved dramatically. Yes, because of the improved performance, I am having so much fun opening her up, that I am actually using more gas, but that is a conscious decision - If I wanted to, I could keep my foot out of it, play it real easy, and I'd probably see some modest Mileage Gains - but then I bought a Z, not a "Prius" - FUN is the objective, not "gas mileage". All of this said, the note from the exhaust upon acceleration alone is worth the modification!

Next mod - High Flow Cats and Cat Back Exhaust. And then, the engine will be breathing as efficiently as it can be...! I can't wait for the even more improved performance, and the better note.

By the way, DYNO day is March 24th. I'll get you hard results then with just the K&N Typhoons (a friend's Z), and then with all mods (My Z)... :eekdance: :driving:

gsxr750 02-14-2012 02:30 PM

Its really hard to believe individual claims of vast improvements in speed power or accelleration for the CAI KITS, (humans are not biological engine dynos), unless your a "Terminator" under that skin.

So most of these claims are very subjective from individual to individual.

I would only go by actual proven dyno charts by reputable manufactures and private claims.

From what I discovered from different dyno posting here and other online sources, these cold air intake kits only really make 5-9 hp and with the addition of a good free flowing racing exhaust you could get it up to 10-15 hp.

The real problem is that there really is no magical cheap bolt on way to increase HP considerably, out side of TURBO CHARGING or NITROUS OXIDE and both of these effect engine life and reliability.

So if you PPL talk to any reputable engine or true performance shops that really road race or build cars and engines for winning racers and winning teams. They will tell there is no magic or bolt quick way to HP gains, the simple truth is that the engine needs to come apart pistons, cams, valves, head work, rods, stroking etc. Then along with some quality air intake kits and racing exhaust or turbo charging them, if necessary for the particular application.

You really can't trust to many of these little performance shops that just get a small rental building and buy a dyno. Then start doing all these simple bolt on mods and charging ppl for the dyno runs, along with the part sales and installation. Along side their 21" rim. tire selections and window tint.

Some of these small shops may know what they are doing , but most probably have little or no real world experience building or tunning engines.

You really want to find a shop that builds engines or sets up cars for most of the top regional racers etc. These shops can be found by going to a local track day event or getting a pit pass to some top amatuer events, most of the racers and mechanics will be glaid to share info on who to go to for the best work.

So in my opinion these current bolt on CAI and Cat back exhausts are just the new form of "Snake Oil " being sold to the young new car buyers.

If you have a few extra dollars and want to do something usefull for your 370z, then get a good clear car bra installed and some quality protective seat covers or leather seat upgrade.

Heres what I did, Nano Fusion Clear Bra on most of the cars front end and exposed panels,window tint and a set of Cover King ballistic black seat covers to protect the seats. Total cost $1000 for everything.

Speedy 02-14-2012 02:48 PM

Track times really tell the tale. Dynos can be manipulated way to easy.

For example, let the car completely cool and make a run. Then make 3-5 more back to back runs and the power will start to decline due to heat soak. What's to say the base line wasn't a dead hot run and the new and improved a bone cold run? A true 5HP gain now becomes 11-15 on paper.

Dynos are really nothing more than tuning tools. The times I've tested parts, I've done it back to back without ever unstrapping the car from the dyno. Same tire pressure, etc. I do three runs and take the average. That will give the best idea of what it actually gained. You also have to watch the correction factor and smoothing used as those can both affect the numbers.

Here's the testing I did on the Challenger with cat back and CAI.

<table border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="5" width="498" align="center"><tbody><tr><td width="120">
Stock Intake HP
</td> <td width="120">
Stock Intake Torque
</td> <td width="120">
Mopar CAI HP
</td> <td width="120">
Mopar CAI Torque
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Run 1: 335.08
</td> <td>
355.52
</td> <td>
340.19
</td> <td>
366.86
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Run 2: 333.97
</td> <td>
356.11
</td> <td>
340.14
</td> <td>
358.89
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Run 3: 335.77
</td> <td>
358.98
</td> <td>
340.73
</td> <td>
364.32
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Average: 334.94
</td> <td>
356.87
</td> <td>
340.35
</td> <td>
363.35
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
http://www.speedysgarage.net/challen...r_cai_dyno.jpg

<table border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="5" width="600" align="center"><tbody><tr><td>
Magnaflow 16515 HP
</td> <td>
Magnaflow 16515 Torque
</td> <td width="120">
Magnaflow 16515
and
Mopar CAI HP
</td> <td width="120">
Magnaflow 16515 and
Mopar CAI Torque
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Run 1: 347.01
</td> <td>
373.36
</td> <td>
347.98
</td> <td>
373.02
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Run 2: 344.40
</td> <td>
370.07
</td> <td>
346.64
</td> <td>
373.70
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Run 3: 343.85
</td> <td>
365.20
</td> <td>
347.01
</td> <td>
368.26
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
Average: 345.09
</td> <td>
369.54
</td> <td>
347.21
</td> <td>
371.66
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
http://www.speedysgarage.net/challen...enger_dyno.jpg

Now with the motor and blower it's right about 600RWHP and 600RWTQ.

gsxr750 02-14-2012 03:01 PM

So Speedy for your 10 -15 HP and 20 lbs torque gains, how much did you spend with the dyno runs. Also the costs of the engine build and tunning to get 600 hp.

Please share it will help to inform these novices.

ZMan8 02-14-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750 (Post 1543673)
Its really hard to believe individual claims of vast improvements in speed power or accelleration for the CAI KITS, (humans are not biological engine dynos), unless your a "Terminator" under that skin.

So most of these claims are very subjective from individual to individual.

I would only go by actual proven dyno charts by reputable manufactures and private claims.

From what I discovered from different dyno posting here and other online sources, these cold air intake kits only really make 5-9 hp and with the addition of a good free flowing racing exhaust you could get it up to 10-15 hp.

The real problem is that there really is no magical cheap bolt on way to increase HP considerably, out side of TURBO CHARGING or NITROUS OXIDE and both of these effect engine life and reliability.

So if you PPL talk to any reputable engine or true performance shops that really road race or build cars and engines for winning racers and winning teams. They will tell there is no magic or bolt quick way to HP gains, the simple truth is that the engine needs to come apart pistons, cams, valves, head work, rods, stroking etc. Then along with some quality air intake kits and racing exhaust or turbo charging them, if necessary for the particular application.

You really can't trust to many of these little performance shops that just get a small rental building and buy a dyno. Then start doing all these simple bolt on mods and charging ppl for the dyno runs, along with the part sales and installation. Along side their 21" rim. tire selections and window tint.

Some of these small shops may know what they are doing , but most probably have little or no real world experience building or tunning engines.

You really want to find a shop that builds engines or sets up cars for most of the top regional racers etc. These shops can be found by going to a local track day event or getting a pit pass to some top amatuer events, most of the racers and mechanics will be glaid to share info on who to go to for the best work.

So in my opinion these current bolt on CAI and Cat back exhausts are just the new form of "Snake Oil " being sold to the young new car buyers.

If you have a few extra dollars and want to do something usefull for your 370z, then get a good clear car bra installed and some quality protective seat covers or leather seat upgrade.

Heres what I did, Nano Fusion Clear Bra on most of the cars front end and exposed panels,window tint and a set of Cover King ballistic black seat covers to protect the seats. Total cost $1000 for everything.

:wtf2:

I have read many members on this forum who bought various CAI's, HFC's, and/or exhausts and put htem on the dyno for proven gains. Many of these people even ran comparison dyno tests on the same day to get more accurate results. Read all the reviews for things like stillen intakes, stillen exhaust, F.I. exhuast, berk exhaust, berk cats etc. (there are too many to list off) I have also seen people claim faster track times, better throttle response, etc. with these "bolt ons". Many people make in the range of 25-35 hp more with intake, hfc, and cbe (no tune) and usually can make more usable power, bring back low end torque, and make 5 addition hp with a tune on top of all those.

Speedy 02-14-2012 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gsxr750 (Post 1543723)
So Speedy for your 10 -15 HP and 20 lbs torque gains, how much did you spend with the dyno runs. Also the costs of the engine build and tunning to get 600 hp.

Please share it will help to inform these novices.

The catback was like $650 and the CAI was like $250. I knew neither was going to give me huge gains on the Challenger, but the stock air box looked like a microwave and the stock exhaust sounded like a sewing machine LOL

Both had big value to me outside of the measly 15HP they picked up, which by the way I NEVER felt seat of the pants....guess my butt dyno is off?

The motor and supercharger, and all that....sheesh I didn't even keep track, but it wasn't cheap. I sold a CBR1000RR Repsol Edition to buy the blower.

It costs money to go fast. Challenger runs 11.50s at 123-124MPH and weighs 4300lbs with me in it. MPH is good for a 10 second pass, I just gotta practice driving the manual trans to get it there.

Speedy 02-14-2012 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZMan8 (Post 1543742)
:wtf2:

I have read many members on this forum who bought various CAI's, HFC's, and/or exhausts and put htem on the dyno for proven gains. Many of these people even ran comparison dyno tests on the same day to get more accurate results. Read all the reviews for things like stillen intakes, stillen exhaust, F.I. exhuast, berk exhaust, berk cats etc. (there are too many to list off) I have also seen people claim faster track times, better throttle response, etc. with these "bolt ons". Many people make in the range of 25-35 hp more with intake, hfc, and cbe (no tune) and usually can make more usable power, bring back low end torque, and make 5 addition hp with a tune on top of all those.

I've seen a couple of folks mention better throttle response, but I'm confused by that. I've not looked at the stock intake system on mine too closely yet, but does it have mufflers or baffles? That would be about the only thing that could cause any sensation of better throttle response going with an aftermarket system that eliminated any such baffling allowing a more direct shot for the air to flow, but it would have to be a significant change. Cooler air alone isn't going to help the throttle any.

Like I said early on, the 370z is a MAF based system (mass air flow) so it's PCM can and will adjust to more air flow by adding necessary fuel and thus more power is made. Same with Mustangs and Camaros. However, I think it'd be hard to really say you feel 20HP. It's just not going to be that obvious when it comes to moving a 3300 lbs car. Under IDEAL conditions and perfect driving you'll only realize about a 2MPH faster ET in the 1/4 mile with an extra 20 horses. That's not a lot considering and I'd be shocked if one could actually feel it driving.

The best bang for the buck will likely be a custom tune. My next thing to look in to is the tuning on these cars to see what's what. I can tell ya on the Challenger, adding 1 degree of timing to the tune gives an extra 15-20HP. I'd imagine it's similar on the 370z, but you have to be careful and run good fuel. So if the stock tune is uber safe, and they normally are, you could fatten up the AFR a tick and keep it around 12-12:5 and add a couple degrees of timing and gain 30-40HP just in the tune alone, and likely with throttle by wire make the throttle a bit more sensitive in the program, and have a REAL gain in throttle response.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2