Stillen G3's those who own with real results please Chime in
So..was doing a bit of research on this part and ran into this quote from NY Bladez which was posted on Elia CID's thread regarding the G3's...
Quote:
Here are their threads for reference... http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaus...pressions.html http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaus...eview-etc.html Can some Stillen G3 owners chime in and support or negate the truth of the type of HP these things really produce? |
I also heard that stock intakes are the best for the 370z, apparently some people complained that the Stillen intakes can cause the car to stall, not sure if this applies for the 370 but its quite evident for the 350z.
|
Intakes causing a car to stall = installer fail.
|
Quote:
It seems that no one is coming out thus far to negate the claims made by Semtex and RCZ....The thing about their threads is that they actually have documents to support their claims of actual HP gains...Based on the reviews that Semtex has done with other products, I know him to be a straight shooter when calling out numbers of performance parts...He did so with the Stillen Headers...showing no favortism and giving his honest opinion that it wsa not worth the $$$ and time...even though he was rocking other "Stillen" parts on his car such as the CBE, CAI, and the Underpulley... |
I can only speak from the butt dyno after I installed the intakes, get them, you won't regret it.
|
Quote:
|
i havent taken mine to the dyno but i noticed a difference as soon as i installed them and then it got so much better with the berk hfc and cbe....so i say get em....u will notice the difference and the sound is so nice when u have WOT
|
Well...based on what. I've read and researched, I haven't come aross anything that supports any validity of the G3's being a bad product...I. have found only good info and supporting evidence backing up this product...All the negative info regarding intakes happen to be based on supporting evidence (Dynos) that the short air intakes like the Takedas don't produce any numbers for the Z...so I pulled da trigger and will be getting these babies soon
|
buy it.. you wont regret getting those bad boys.. who ever says they are bad. they probably or for sure they dont have them or they cant afford them!
Stillen G3 intakes ftw! |
Quote:
The only negative I have heard is something about the air cond. tubing being rubbed or something. Will be pulling up AK's install thread today...he did it real justice. :) Good luck with yours ! :driving: |
Quote:
|
When you cross reference the cost and the hp gain...its not worth it. Claiming 15-20whp from a CAI is a little hard to accept on a naturally aspirated motor. From what I've been told, the stock air boxes are not restrictive and provide the best hp and torque for the motor.
|
Quote:
You may not make 18whp as they claim, but theres a definite power increase along with a much nicer growl. Nissan designed a great intake system, but to pretend that it was designed to make the most power without regards to cost is naive. You bought a $30k sports car, not a ferrari. |
I'm set to install these this weekend. The only perf mod I have is the F.I. CBE so I doubt I'll feel any gains but I'll let you know if I do. I mean you shouldn't expect anything spectacular with any of these mods short of forced induction. My primary reason for modding is to be a little unique and improve the driving experience. Any added performance is just icing on the cake.
|
Here is what a top Nissan tuner had to say about the G3s after his dyno test on an automatic. It tested out a little better on a manual.
"Since the stock intake system is so efficient we were pretty sure that the Stillen intake was not going to make much difference and we were both right and seriously wrong. When running on the dyno, the Stillen intake produced on the average 3 more whp but less torque at 270 whp and 216 lb/ft with the power gains coming high in the powerband above 6700 rpm. Below 6700 rpm, the Stillen Intake lost a slight bit of power and torque. This isn’t the whole story though. For the sake of curiosity, we removed the front bumper fascia and ran the car with the airflow of the dyno’s cooling fan blowing straight on the filters. We were amazed to see that the Stillen intake belt out an additional 10 whp nearly completely across the board! Not believing our eyes, we ran the car with the bumper cover off for many pulls and the numbers repeated. We then replaced the bumper cover and the power numbers dropped to what they had been. Stillen’s cold air intake is clearly a superior design with great power potential but the bumper traps hot air in the vicinity of the filters which nullifies most of the gains. We hope Stillen reads this and creates a bumper vent and heatshield kit so that the full potential of this great intake can be realized. Since people do not drive without a front bumper we are only going to show our with bumper cover power results." |
Quote:
problem solved |
I think that the Stillen intakes are a great buy not only for some high rpm breathing, but it changes the character of the car completely above 6k rpm. It makes the car feel much more aggressive and eager both in the throttle response/power/sound which I think suites the character of the car. Match the Stillen intakes with fang vents to force air up to the filters and you have a great intake setup.
|
My G 3's made 20 rwhp over the stock intake, It was the first mod that i did
Base line 264. stillen G3 284. I have the dyno to prove it with the bumper on. It's a 7 AT. Z |
Quote:
|
Z eliminator....with. ur ET and trap speed I believe that this part produced some significant gains for you...Thanks for sharing
|
Installed the G3 this week and there is a definate increase in performance/sound. Can't really understand why this is even being questioned with so many satisfied customers out there.
Look forward to going to the track this weekend to verify the improvement. So far best time is 8.71 in the 1/8th @ 83.8. Surely these will get me to an 8.6? Hoping for 8.5's. |
Quote:
So I found this about the Injen CAIs. http://thmotorsports.com/storage/inj...intakedyno.jpg So you gain the peak hp from 7k rpm to 7.5k rpm only. I found RCZ's thread when he reviewed the Stillen G3 intakes. He dynoed 20whp from the intakes, but seeing that his bumper cover was off and air was directed directly to the filters, it would resulted in the high hp gains. http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaus...pressions.html But RCZ did state that " I was pretty much speechless. I have never seen a 20HP gain from intakes on an N/A car. " |
Tongman....I do appreiate the info that you are bringing to the table...after all we are all here to learn from eah other based on our info and individual experiences.... I too was at one point lead to believe that intakes do not produce significant gains....however based on all that I have read regarding the Stillen G3's I am pretty confident with the numbers that they produce and strongly feel that they are a great performance part.... don't get me wrong...not all intakes produce good results for the Z...for instance the Takeda short intakes as well as other intakes seem to produce little to negative power for the Z....however when talking about the STILLEN G3'S I feel its safe to say that based on what has been said about this part as well as RCZ'S and Semtex's reviews/dynos...its pretty clear cut that these particular intakes produce good results....
You're right about RCZ produing 20whp with his bumper off....but in Semtex's thread he did his dyno with the bumper on and produced 14.7WHP... Also in Semtex and RCZ's threads it was debated about the whole bumper on/off deal and some people posed some good things to consider...such as when you're on a dyno that you are at a stand still...so taking the bumper off and having the fans blow could probably fabricate a real actual driving experience where your car is traveling on the road having wind/air being forced into the grill area...some also pointed out and argued that the amount of wind/air that the fans are blowing into the filters with no bumper on can not duplicate real actual wind/air as compared to when driving on the road and not at a standstill such as a dyno run...of course this is subject to debate and interpretation....but they are both good points to consider...I have found supporting info to prove that other intakes don't produce good numbers...but it seems that Stillen got this product down to produce decent gains....I mean RCZ, Semtex, and ZEliminator got great results and all of them did independent tests/dynos to see whether Stillens claims of Whp gains were in fact true.... I have not found one thread yet that negates with actual proof anything bad about the STILLEN G3'S... The reason why I started this thread was because as I was conducting research on this particular part I came across a post made by NYBLADEZ on a Stillen G3 thread that was posted by Elia CID..in. which I quoted NYBLADEZ's comment on the opening post of this thread on Page 1....I couldn't figure why he and others felt this way about the Stillen G3's when all the research I did on this forum said and proved otherwise... |
Quote:
|
Things I noticed after installing a G3 intake were smoother/easier throttle
response when going very slow, smoother coming off high revs, the car just doesn't fall off the revs, and when hitting the gas revs up smoother not like it is being thrown to high revs. I only have an intake so far, but these are the same things I noticed on last two vehicles I owned and changed intake and exhaust on also. The one thing I didn't like was having to cut on the car, if you wanted to re-install the stock intake again for possible trade-in then you might be looking to replace the piece you cut on possibly?? |
[QUOTE=smokejr;736440]Things I noticed after installing a G3 intake were smoother/easier throttle
response when going very slow, smoother coming off high revs, the car just doesn't fall off the revs, and when hitting the gas revs up smoother not like it is being thrown to high revs. I only have an intake so far, but these are the same things I noticed on last two vehicles I owned and changed intake and exhaust on also.QUOTE] I'm not a Stillen hater, nor do I want to derail the thread, but you can get those benefits from a more breathable drop in filter panel in the stock air box. |
My bumper was on.
With full bolt on's i ran 12.8009. I have now increased the trap speed's to almost 113 mph, (112.9 is my best) With the stillen CBE, Berk cats, stillen headers, Under drive pulley NRT. i went from 264 rwhp to 311 sae or 322 actual rwhp. ( and my own cobb fuel curve) The power drops off at 7400 to 7500 rpm. It still make 298 at 8100 rpm. 47.6 rwhp was the actual gain and its a 7 AT. SAE RWHP. Jnauts car is going at 12.68 and it's a MT. these 2 370' Z are not slow and i can tell you that mines faster on the street than at the track. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Check my comment above...I said half and if I got 10 out of their 17.5 I'd be delighted. NOW, for some of you who have heard or are saying the G3s are actually not as good as the stock box or have no measurable difference...some stats on today's trip. I installed Friday and drove about 70 miles to the Z Nationals around noon today. I zeroed the MPH/MPG when I hit the interstate. About 65 miles later, I registered an average speed of 64.4 and a MPG of 30.5! We all know a CAI improves gas mileage. I've never pulled much over 27/28 before. Never in the 30s. So what does this mean? It means the G3s are doing SOMETHING better than the stock airboxes. Maybe it's not a huge noticeable power increase (I THINK I notice a difference/increase but I'm allowing for it just being my wishful thinking). But the increase in MPG means the G3s are getting better air inside the engine and it's running more efficiently and if it's doing that, then it's making more HP. And it was around 90 when I made that trip. Another trip I routinely measure is from home to work. I'll see how that one turns out next time I drive to work. PS: I didn't get this thing for increased MPG. It's a side benefit. I'm just using the numbers as proof something good is happening. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and more mileage means less power? if the engine can burn its fuel more effectively than stock and the ECU adapts then I don't see why its impossible. hell I know plenty of people who chiptuned their car and got more power while drinking less fuel. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cold air intake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wow 370ZSteve...was looking at your signature and it seems that based on your comments you're dissatisfied with the G3's which is listed as one of your parts...Did you really get a decrease in power from them?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2