![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
upev is a way to tune a factory ecu. They are eagerly working through the 370 computers. Rich and Jarad over there are great guys. I would get all your bolt ons finished then do a tune, that is my plan.... I am still wondering how to tune the vvel i understand the concept as I been through the Nissan training on it, but how to maximize it with a not adjusting exhaust cam.
On a side note talked with Josh from stillen a bit today and i think the reason we are losing power in the midrange is due to the increased flow of the headers but the bottle necks in the factory y-pipe. I can not say enough how great there customer service is/has/ and no doubt will be. |
LOL Uprev is the company, but the tuner software is called Osiris you data log with there programed called Cipher. Not as hard as i make it out to be. The first batch of370z roms are getting close to done.
|
Good post :tup:
-Hunter |
Quote:
|
Why not?
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, I see what you mean. However, I think it's safe to say that the performance gains will be similar to the G37. I think (hope?) that these will produce some nice gains when combined with a better flowing catback. It doesn't make much sense to do one without the other. Come on you're halfway there :)
Nah I understand where you are coming from, I'm thinking about buying a set myself and coupling it with a catless catback. I'll know sooner than later. |
Quote:
I am talking with r2c intakes right now about testing there intake, so i might splurge on a stillen cat back in the next month and not sure what brand test pipes yet. Main reason for doing headers first was to get the PIA mod out of the way first.... only n/a install that is gonna be more of a challenge if i do it is cams and only exhaust cams seem to be a viable option but that will depend upon intake timing options. |
GTM is in the final stages of getting their catback ready. One thing I particularly like about their design is the X-pipe.
I would take that over a Y-pipe any day. |
Hey Guys,
Just wanted to jump in and offer a little insight into the exhaust systems that STILLEN has been developing for the past couple of decades. Whenever we develop an exhaust system for a vehicle we typically spend a few months just trying to figure out what works best. One of the real benefits to being a "niche" company is that we can dedicate a lot more time to developing exhaust systems for Nissan and Infiniti vehicle's than most other companies would be able to. That really allows us to fine tune our products and pick up every bit of performance possible. In 2002 we started development on different exhaust configurations and designs for the VQ motors and tested dozens of different setups. The end result is our current offering which was tested a few years ago by an independent magazine (I believe it was import tuner) to be the highest horsepower producing exhaust system on the market for the Z's and G's. |
So Kyle, does that mean that the loss in the mid-range that RelentlessRY experienced is to be expected? Like it's by design, in other words? Or are Stillen's VQ headers meant to be used in conjunction with Stillen's cat-back exhaust only (to address that issue, presumably)?
|
I wouldn't rely on dyno charts from a manufacturer. Many times those numbers are inflated. If it's not posted by some one I trust, plain and simple, I don't believe it!
|
We haven't actually dyno tested a 370Z with our headers on it yet so I can't say exactly what is going on but it would make sense that the headers aren't being optimized due to the factory exhaust.
|
Kyle, so you're saying that your exhaust design will at least match the power produced by a true dual exhaust with test pipes? I like how your catback sounds and the gains with your headers so I have no reason to buy anything else. The only thing holding me back right now is the fact that I have the suspicion I may be compromising a bit with the X pipe. I thought maybe you chose this design for cost and/or emissions testing rather than performance. Reading your post, however, it seems that my assumption is wrong. My point is that maybe you should point out that the design is primarily performance driven. If you hadn't posted that, I wouldn't have considered an X pipe design at all. Things have changed now.
|
Everything that STILLEN does is performance driven. The second thought is "how will this effect emissions and/or legality."
One thing to keep in mind is that a cat-back exhaust has ZERO effect on your emissions legality. As long as you aren't modifying or by-passing your catalytic converters you can (legally) do anything you want to the exhaust system. Your only "legality" concern with a cat-back exhaust is going to be noise. Some states are starting to crack down on noise ordinance regulations and issuing tickets for exhausts that are too loud. The problem is that the only state that actually has any kind of regulation is California. So, STILLEN went ahead and performed an assortment of tests to the California standards and we found that our exhaust is completely compliant with California sound decibel standards. Keep in mind that STILLEN is comprised of a company of enthusiasts. Steve Millen is a world champion race-car driver. Our lead engineer has a modified 300ZX. Our marketing manager has a very cleanly modified G35 coupe. I have built a few extensively modified vehicle's myself. Our sales team consists of enthusiasts who own everything from turbo supra's to G sedan's and highly modified trucks. Everything we do, we do as enthusiasts which means cost and "ease of manufacturing" and pretty much everything else is a second thought to performance and function. |
Excellent,
OK, that's what I like to hear. I will consider a catback too :) |
Guys I am going to Side with Kyle here. I only posted to show the results with just headers. He is a picture I like to draw so some people can understand better... Try breathing through a straw, the end nearest to your mouth is very large but the exit is very small not matter how hard you try only the small amount will pass... Much the same is happening with my exhaust right now.
I wanted to get this mod out of the way first. It is a Major pain to install headers on this car or any z/g car. I plan on going with a cat back exhaust. I am working on sponsorship with a few companies. So please no Stillen Bashing they area great company with many awesome products. Just and FYI the OE part numbers for factory exh manifolds are the same between the g37 coupe and 370z. |
Kyle can you PM me about your Tundra?? I have a customer with one and I need some advice.
|
Quote:
|
When will you post dyno info?
|
Quote:
|
dyno info sorry for the delay guys
baseline http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...nkbase370z.jpg Headers http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...lenheaders.jpg |
just for giggles here is my car at 667 miles in our shop.
YouTube - 370z Dyno relentlessrpm.com 279.6 HP and 241 ftlbsTQ |
am i reading this right, you lost 15 wtq and gained 6whp?
|
FYI.. These results are atypical to anything else we've seen from anyone, I'm passing these results on to our R&D staff, but the immediate thing is the difference in time in the dyno's, conditions.. it's not a back to back test.
After the cat-back install will be an interesting test.. still different days, different conditions, but will definitely benefit.. |
I expected to not get alot of gain due to the Y pipe is so restrictive and dont forget about the Cats
i think we can get more HP from headers after Installing HFC and cat-back |
Quote:
More to come, just tight on funds. |
Quote:
Relentless, Please don't take this as a personal attack, but you may want to get another dyno done because these are highly unlikely to be accurate. Horsepower is (tq x revs)/5252. As such to make more horsepower, one must either a. make more torque at the same revs b. make same torque at higher revs or c. both. The red line going straight down on your dyno plot is showing at what revs you are making the numbers listed at the chart. Comparing dyno 1 to dyno 2: Dyno 1, you are making 283.1 hp and 209.8 ft/lbs at around 7100 rpms - with the pull going up to around 7350 rpms (short of redline). Dyno 2, you are making 288.6 hp but somehow making less torque at 195.2 so the only way for this to be possible would be to make it at higher revs, which you do according to the chart. Only problem is that it says that was revving 7775 rpms - past redline and that the pull went to almost 8000 rpms before letting up - which is past fuel cut. My opinion: a faulty reading on what revs you were at threw off the reading. Truth be told, STRICTLY JUDGING FROM THE PLOT ALONE, it appears that you lost a significant amount of power throughout the curve - which would be shown if you put one on top of the other and shifted the plot left by 500 rpms to compensate for the clearly faulty RPM readings. HOWEVER, I'll reserve judgment on whether you really lost power for your next dyno simply because there could have been other factors/errors which could have come into play, esp. if I am right on my faulty RPM read theory. So in conclusion, I believe that well...these dynos are anything but conclusive on the topic of power gains from Stillen Headers. |
very good point
|
Quote:
I have a dyno at my place of business as this is what i do for a living and Josh from stillen will attest to that. The charts are auto populated by the dyno machine. Just for HAHA's sometime this week I am going to do another pull and report my findings. side note you present many valid points but I have over 30 dyno runs already on the 370z and these are the average runs, not the highest not the lowest. I have made as high as 297 with the headers and as low as 277 rwhp. Temp has a lot to do with the results. |
no personal attack taken btw we are all here to better the Nissan/370z community as a whole.
ryan |
That's great that you have a dyno at your place of business! I'd probably be a happier person if I had such access to one!
Anyway, I understand when people get dynos done, its to add some objectivity to any subjective impressions we may have to a particular mod and as a result, I know a lot of people get offended when their dyno plots are questioned for one reason or another. Thanks for being understanding. Finally, thanks for publishing your findings and I look forward to seeing your new dyno plots, which I hope will resolve some of the discrepancies. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2