07-12-2016, 04:29 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: australia
Posts: 58
Drives: 09 370Z bs m6
Rep Power: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmo370z
You're going to be highly disappointed my friend. Unless you plan on dumping a bunch of money into a Na set up, the gains for the cost can't be justified. This is mainly for the boosted crowd. But i guess we won't truly find out until it is tested by multiple people.
|
Im not spending the coin just yet. Just keen to see the results. Im more excited for CJM's version. I think the key will be how well you can integrate the upper and lower so that there is no lip to disturb airflow where it joins the lower. Aam mentions a 55% increase in runner flow so we will have to wait and see. I would like to see a runner with a shape that matches cylinder head port instead of a square to oval. But that means new lower and upper design of course.
|
|
|