![]() |
A new turbo....PTE's 6870
Just thought post this up here....
As I had mentioned in another post, I attended the SEMA show last week (for the first time :) ). Some great cars out there, and some incredible new technologies in the after-market performance world. The one thing I really wanted to see was the new turbo at Precision's booth, a 68mm compressor and 70mm turbine unit rated at 1,100 HP. It is a very nice turbo, and although it is not available with a twin scroll turbine yet, it will still pack a hell of a punch with the tangential housing. The best part is that it will be compatible with the all new Boosted Performance V 2.0 kit. Since it comes with a large 70mm turbine wheel, it will be a great match for the VQ37VHR especially for those of you that really want to get the most power out of built engines on E85. More details can be found here: http://www.precisionturbo.net/news/P...r-Released/284 |
Please make turbo kit for AT!
|
Very nice
|
Nice sasha...you went all the way to sema to see the turbo??...if so hell ya dedication. Love it...that will be one hell of an upgrade for your kit...
|
this is going to get really juicy really quick!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The twin scroll will be released soon as well...and I just have to make 100% sure it fits with the largest turbine housing. |
Congrats sasha...good luck...
|
This beast is now available with a twin scroll configuration:
http://www.precisionturbo.net/news/P...-Available/288 I will order one of these right away, and take a lot of measurements just to make sure the turbine outside dimensions will work with the VHR V 2.0 kit. I know for a fact that the tangential (non twin scroll) turbine will work, but the twin scroll would be ideal. |
|
Quote:
As soon as you find out Sasha let me know I'm really thinking about using this instead of the 6766 you sent me . |
Quote:
|
Sasha - What A/R are you thinking? Sticking with 1.15 or something different?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There may be customers that are looking to build the engine if they get bored with 600whp. For those, this may be the turbo of choice right from the get go. Perhaps just upgrade the turbine when the times comes. |
Quote:
Need a guinea pig?? haha |
Quote:
|
haha touche! Oh how id love a bigger turbo (yes yes I know I have a stock block, but still)... mmmmhmmm booooooost. lol
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Oh man this is so tempting!! Can you please some dimensions when you get the turbo Sasha.
|
Quote:
|
Update...Finally got one of these turbos in my hands, and it looks fantastic.
Couple of pictures: On the left, the new 6870 with the largest (1.32 a/r) turbine housing and on the right is the standard 6266 with the 1.15 a/r housing: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...psjcudbhyu.jpg The business end: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...psb0zdcrkj.jpg http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps0xklwgss.jpg Now the important picture: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps3yirmtnt.jpg On the left is the 6870, and on the right is a 1.32 a/r turbine for the 6266 turbo. As you can see the two are identical in diameter. This means that the larger 68mm turbo is going to be an option with this kit, without any fitment issues. This turbo is rated to flow 110lbs of air per minute. That really opens up the 800+whp door with E85 fuel. Another quick comparison...6870 T4 1.32 twin scroll vs 6870 .96 a/r tangential vs 6266 1.32 a/r T4 twin scroll housing: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...pseku6sf10.jpg The .96 a/r housing (non twin scroll) is much more compact, and would work just as well with the V2 manifolds. I am doing a complete install for a local customer in the next couple of weeks and will get a chance to really check how this looks on the car. Will update this thread at that point. |
Awesome find but how many guys actually have built motors for such an application..? None the less at least the option is there... Can't wait to see mr sqeeze's setup but personally I would have gone with the 6466 (faster spool, more efficient)..
|
Quote:
As for efficiency, the 6266, 6466 and the 6766 will all work well and will get you the same HP across the board on pump gas (knock limiting). I have customers with all those turbos, as well as a couple with 7675 turbos. On pump gas, same tuner, same dyno there are all within 5hp. So in theory the 6266 would be the best fit, because it does have the lightest rotating assembly. So, for stock block applications a BB 6266 with a T4 turbine 1.15 a/r turbo will be the most efficient, because most of the tuners are comfortable pushing these engines to no more than 550whp on pump gas. For E85 applications and stock block for up to 620whp, I would keep the 6266, but go with the 1.32 a/r housing. Of course, most tuners will be hesitant to push the stock block to that power level. I should also mention that I would not hesitate for a second in putting this new 6870 on a stock block with a 1.0 a/r turbine housing. THAT, would also be a very efficient set-up, especially where these engines like to operate...in the higher RPM range. Spool difference would be negligible, and exhaust back pressure would be very low, which means very high efficiency. They key to all these turbos on a VHR engine is turbine housing. Based on all the testing I have done, a T4 housing is optimal. A lot of guys are concerned about spool, when really, flow should be the primary factor when choosing a turbo (turbine). |
Quote:
I see what you did there. :bowrofl: |
Sasha is it an optical delusion in the 2nd and 3rd picture cause the 6870 compressor flange appears to be slightly larger than the one on the 6266. Are they both standard twin scroll T4 flanges?
|
Quote:
|
Optics....they are the same.
|
Quote:
So.....who's going to be the one that takes the plunge and drop the 6870 into their build???:stirthepot: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know of one 6766 that's close to complete but everyone else is on the 6266 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
6870 T4 1.32 a/r, fits with room to spare:
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...pswbyk9wtc.jpg http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...psieo4z2lc.jpg http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...pskdhux3ya.jpg |
Pardon my ignorance
Pardon my ignorance, but having a turbo so close to the ground, would it be affected by water/rain? I understood that if cold water is splashed onto a hot metal that can cause it to crack. I know (at least I think) the housing is made of cast iron so when the car is driven when raining, what can possibly happen to the metal?
|
Quote:
|
I think with the airflow under the car,it would keep the turbo cooler as opposed to having it in the engine bay,no?
|
Nice to see that it fits Sasha now I really want one :ugh2:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2