Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Forced Induction (http://www.the370z.com/forced-induction/)
-   -   Time for some boost! VSR Motorsports Single Turbo Kit (http://www.the370z.com/forced-induction/88477-time-some-boost-vsr-motorsports-single-turbo-kit.html)

MidnightBlueZ 01-22-2015 07:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Well the results are in and unfortunately we didn't hit the 700 threshold. Darn it.. However, the torque and power curve is ridiculous! We think the .82 A/R hot side had something to do with it not being able to push to 700. When the boost was raised to 19psi it didn't help any. Sooo, I'm happy with the results, it's too bad we couldn't make what we wanted (oh well) but it did make some very solid numbers! There is a video being made of the car very soon. I'm as anxious as some of you are..

639.5 rwhp
615.7 rwtrq
16 psi
E85

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/...psgxrlbgye.jpg

COSMO 01-23-2015 06:22 AM

Could be that single 3" exhaust held you back..

MidnightBlueZ 01-23-2015 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COSMO (Post 3089825)
Could be that single 3" exhaust held you back..

Yeah you could be right about that.. Maybe it doesn't have enough flow and one reason the torque is so high..

carlitos_370z 01-23-2015 08:20 AM

DAMN CAN WAIT TO SEE THE VID.. BTW THOSE ARE GREAT NUMBERS :tup:

jwick 01-23-2015 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MidnightBlueZ (Post 3089863)
Yeah you could be right about that.. Maybe it doesn't have enough flow and one reason the torque is so high..

COSMO could be right but isn't he downpipe 3" too? That would mean you have a bottleneck in the whole system.

Could be your TQ number is that high because the turbine housing is undersized. A bigger A/R might fix that but my knowledge of designing a turbo setup stops at having read Maximum Boost by Mr. Corky Bell :tup:

MidnightBlueZ 01-23-2015 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3089886)
COSMO could be right but isn't he downpipe 3" too? That would mean you have a bottleneck in the whole system.

Could be your TQ number is that high because the turbine housing is undersized. A bigger A/R might fix that but my knowledge of designing a turbo setup stops at having read Maximum Boost by Mr. Corky Bell :tup:

:bowrofl:

Yeah I think it could be possible but yes the downpipe is 3" too. 3" from the turbo back to be exact. Maybe a dual setup would help peak hp but would lose torque?

COSMO 01-23-2015 09:55 AM

No I don't think you would loose any torque but the curve would change.. You have to figure the ID ( inner diameter) of that 3" exhaust is probably 2.75 depending on the wall thickness. Turbo/ turbo's need No backpressure, Superchargers need some though...:tup:



Quote:

Originally Posted by MidnightBlueZ (Post 3089925)
:bowrofl:

Yeah I think it could be possible but yes the downpipe is 3" too. 3" from the turbo back to be exact. Maybe a dual setup would help peak hp but would lose torque?


MidnightBlueZ 01-23-2015 10:00 AM

I agree it would change some sort for sure! I love the single exhaust though it sounds awesome. I kinda doubt it's a 1/4" thick wall tube though. Still interesting..

By the way I did find out the charge piping is 2.5" which I believe BP stated before.

COSMO 01-23-2015 10:00 AM

Also that turbo is rated at 750hp since it is non ball bearing so I was expecting atleast 700whp on e85.. The max on that turbo should be right around 36psi..

COSMO 01-23-2015 10:02 AM

Can't imagine the heat that thing is going to generate since it is bottlenecking. I would highly suggest picking up a FI exhaust and open that thing up so it can breath and send a log to mike so he can make adjustments on your a/f...

COSMO 01-23-2015 10:10 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Here is a dyno I found from a Toyota supra using a 6266,6466, and 6766 precision turbo.. Notice the 36 psi but also keep in mind the toyo has a 3.0 liter motor and the z is a 3.7. The z will allow more air flow volume so 36 psi would not be needed...

COSMO 01-23-2015 10:22 AM

The 2.5 in your case is fine because you have aftermarket MAF's.. The stock would have maxed out at 17psi with 2.5" intake tubes..



Quote:

Originally Posted by MidnightBlueZ (Post 3089998)
I agree it would change some sort for sure! I love the single exhaust though it sounds awesome. I kinda doubt it's a 1/4" thick wall tube though. Still interesting..

By the way I did find out the charge piping is 2.5" which I believe BP stated before.


COSMO 01-23-2015 10:24 AM

Don't get me wrong those are great numbers but your system could be a lot more efficient...

jwick 01-23-2015 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COSMO (Post 3090022)
The 2.5 in your case is fine because you have aftermarket MAF's.. The stock would have maxed out at 17psi with 2.5" intake tubes..

Where did you get 17psi as the max?

I have 2.75" intake tubes and stock MAFs. I maxed at 11.3psi

COSMO 01-23-2015 11:22 AM

Don't know why these turbo kits just don't use 3" intake tubes so the MAF's aren't maxed out. My gtm TT kit came with 3" intake tubes and I'm on stock MAF's..


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2