![]() |
Originally Posted by my2004Z Thank you for your opinion but it still seems like the safer route to me. Its not an opinion...its fact. Do the research and understand what
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
How the air is compressed is irrelevant. What is crucial is correct engine management when it comes to safety (i.e. making sure the engine does not grenade) When you say something like 'it seems like the safer route', you are not giving me the impression you have an informed opinion here on the technology and issues at hand. Some of us try to offer some guidance to get a better understanding of the entire system and make a more informed choice for yourself. Let me give you an example (real world). Assuming equal thermal efficiencies between 0 and 12 PSI, would you rather run a 8 PSI SC system that uses an AFPR, fuel pump and timing retard, or a 6 PSI Turbo system with larger injectors and a fully remapped or aftermarket ECU? Now remove the words SC and Turbo from the above paragraph and re-read....that is really what is important. ![]() In either case, my preference would be choice B. - b |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| to supercharge or not to supercharge, that is the question.... | Fleece82 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 14 | 11-14-2010 07:37 PM |
| To Supercharge or NOT to Supercharge... | Red370 | Other Vehicles | 12 | 10-28-2010 07:33 AM |