Auto

The hood is baby sheet compared to the completed SC installed,tuned & dyno-graph.
I'd like to see a solid 500/500 whp/tq on 93'pump gas.

:icon18: Used to be "wrap your asss in fiberglass". Now it's "wrap your asss in carbon fiber". :icon14:

In what decade?

:koolaidwall:

Decade of the Massive Hurricane's!

Wow, looks like they went all out on the transmission. That ain't going to be cheap. Guess speed never is, sigh.

All this talk on automatics is boring. :shakes head: Wish someone would come out with a reasonable sequential gearbox for us manual guys. :driving: :tup:

:iagree:

I'm sure you guys will get over it.

Dang, it doesn't rhyme any more. :p

I think I replied to a similar comment about this already. If the SC does its job, you'll have to pick ONE of those numbers. A positive displacement SC is just going to increase TQ across the board on our already flat TQ curve.

500 ft-lbs @ 7500 RPM = 714 HP
500 HP @ 7500 RPM = 350 ft/lbs

If you really want both 500 ft-lbs and 500 hp (max), then TQ is going to need to nose dive starting at 5252 RPM from 500 ft-lbs down to 350 ft-lbs at 7500 RPM.

I'd say 400-420 ft-lbs across the rev range would be awesome. Plus, I think they wanted to limit it to 400 for the auto trans. Even 400 ft-lbs @ 7500 = 571 HP!

Don't mind the torque; as transmission will be built for it- weather it's TT or SC'd.
Already see numbers from Turbo Z's...but none on positive displacement Z's...only guesstimating by what the V8 SC engines are doing.

I was merely pulling some round numbers out the air/ as the LS SC LT4 makes 650/650 at the flywheel & Ford is around 650/550 SC flywheel...as stock bore/stroke; we only have 225ci....so I didn't want to overly guesstimate the possible numbers,,,,as we've seen Turbo'd stock bottom ends go well over 700H, it's the 600+ wtq that stresses them.
No argument on power curve.

RJM,

Do you plan to provide the Whipple air bypass system for this kit?