Nissan 370Z Forum - Z-Power GT Wing

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)

- Exterior & Interior (http://www.the370z.com/exterior-interior/)

- - Z-Power GT Wing (http://www.the370z.com/exterior-interior/29322-z-power-gt-wing.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegitto-kun (Post 861175)

yes why not lets have everybody talk about how everything is perfect and fine.

such a interesting forum where everybody thinks every single thing is perfect. :tiphat:

In your case I don't mind it you are on the track alot. but I personally think its unneeded when you go to a track once a month or two.

but then again, most can be unbolted like you said.

it just irritates me when im in traffic and I see a subaru or whatever with a big *** aftermarket wing going 30, I just start thinking, why in godsname.

I am more a fan of the more subtle wing.

Some Subaru cars come with massive wings from the factory and they serve a purpose. Besides, why does it bother you when someone takes their money and spends it on an aftermarket part for their car to make themselves feel good?

Now, stick-on-vents should be banned from the roads. :D

I'm glad the Blue370TTs messages were deleted (well, most). I didn't want to post a 500 word essay on how and why so many Civics run 12 to 10 second quarter miles for a fraction of the cost of the 370Z. :tiphat: It's sad the entire Honda tuner scene has been lumped in with the Rice. I expected more from Z owners especially with how cheap the 350z's are getting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirkster (Post 862935)

I am not sure how much additional downforce this wing makes but I want one...

Its even Nissan compatiable

http://www.limpidity.org/images/Zpics/cars-26.jpg

i think the big issue is that all big wings are lumped in as rice just because people used to throw any old wing up. Some big wings do look good even if they arent used for function. So big wings can look good, they can be functional and they can be rice. People who think they are only for one thing are the problem... plus forgetting the biggest factor of all... personal opinion. for E.G I love that Z-Power Wing this OP posted about. Would I get it for the looks yes. Would I get it for the functionality.. well if its functional too great. Thats my opinion.. on my car.

So call all big wings rice = your just jumpin on the hate train and dont know any better.

Also if you dont have a big wing where else would that girl be??

Quote:

Originally Posted by kkruel55 (Post 861436)

Lol guys guys the point of this thread was not to bash civic drivers but to help determine if my z, now as my track toy, would really benefit from the ings+1. I am planning on starting with instruction then move to light track duty with it... I already know I'm not going pro lol. Just trying to figure out if it is worth it for the downforce.

F, the down force! get some forward force! With some FI!
You said you dont like the Amuse wing right??!?! The ins+1 wing would have been my choice if I would have not gotten Amuse, I know you already told me you want that one so just get it bro, who cares what these yahoos have to to say ings+1 is the sh!t :stirthepot:

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDreamer (Post 863027)

Do you have anything helpful to add to this thread?
A good quality discussion is happening about something people are interested in and you are just trolling it. :gtfo2:

No Dreamer you :gtfo2:
:stirthepot:
:p

how come someone hasn't designed a rear wing using the same mounting supports where you can just bolt-on or off the main wing part from track style or smaller street/dd style when needed??

Quote:

Originally Posted by JB-370z (Post 863136)

I just don't want to buy the ings+1... and realize it is not enough downforce. Does no one have #s on the force it adds? I know I've seen a few of them on Z's in the forum.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirkster (Post 862935)

http://www.limpidity.org/images/Zpics/cars-26.jpg

I think she only adds 130 lb or so of downforce... not to mention a lot of drag lol, not that I would mind the wing addition OR the car...:icon17: