![]() |
Quote:
Edit: unless sarcasm in which case consider the above an elaboration. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If a TC impelled AT performs as well as a standard MT (in the hands of a competent driver) in terms of speed, precision, etc, then that seems like a reasonable lower bound. If it outperforms a MT, then we have no reason to even debate it, other than personal preference. My point is that there is a weird and somewhat arbitrary view of "manual-ness" that doesn't always map onto the actual mechanisms involved or the performance of those mechanisms. Performance does seem to matter in these evaluations, but not as much as perceived manual-ness. That makes no sense to me. As someone else on here posted, if a TC impelled AT performs as well and as reliably as a more complex automated dual or single clutch "manual" transmission, why opt for the more complex system? However, my guess is that folks would still prefer the "automated manual" over the TC impelled automatic simply because of perceived manual-ness, even though for the end user the inputs, qualia, and results would be the same. That's kind of silly. A thought experiment: If the GT-R switched to a better performing TC based trans, that even lowered the cost to the consumer. would people hate it on principal? If so, why? |
Seems to me that, from a strictly performance standpoint, the best transmission is the one that will get you through the quarter or around the track the fastest. Doesn't matter what's on the inside or what it's called.
For a DD, Jordo! sums it up very well: "personal preference." I've had several manual transmissions over the years and thoroughly enjoyed driving them. I still prefer an auto in my DD. When it comes to automatic transmissions, the 370Z has the best I've driven (but my experience is limited). Manual mode is fun and I have no doubts that it can shift faster than I can shift a manual. YMMV :driving: |
Quote:
|
I think it just irks me that the AT vs MT debate is always hamstrung by the view that anything which deviates in design from a (more or less) three pedal MT is not only lesser but deserving of contempt and scorn. It becomes a debate over "right" vs "wrong" and then totally spirals out of control.
It's a machine, not the Code of Hammurabi. |
it also comes down to one can handle modifications the other can't
|
Look I have the AT, its great don't get me wrong but sometimes I wish I had an MT. And as you can see it will be vice versa when sometimes I would want an AT. We cant things that we don't have and once we do its not the same so everyone wins / thread
|
Quote:
That said, I have no idea how many folks with boost also get a beefier clutch at the same time... EDIT: And, to be clear, I also have no problems with criticisms based solely on personal preference -- its the brow beating or attacking of others in order to help them make the "right" choice that rankles me. Why shame people into adopting someone else's views? See further, the recent thread by somebody who doesn't want to "embarrass" himself by purchasing a 7AT... that's kind of a shitty and unnecessary way to feel about a major purchase like a car, and it speaks volumes on this issue. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Manual vs AT
I think most people will dissagree that the Z should only come with a standard transmission. I like 6 speeds and didn't get a chance to drive an auto but I wonder those who chose an auto over a stick and why. I guess if your stuck in traffic most ot your commute it wouild make sense, just asking since I did a search and came empty. :driving:
|
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2