![]() |
Quote:
If you define coilover as concentric shock/spring units, then the Z has a coilovers in the front, but separate mounting locations for the spring and the shock in the rear. Aftermarket "coilover's" duplicate the stock layout for this car (not true for many other vehicles), but provide three big advantages: 1. different -- usually stiffer -- spring rates and shock valving than stock. Those with progressive springs can give you a softer initial rate that stiffen up as they are compressed. The shock valving of the "coilover" is supposedly matched to the spring rate to provide just the right amount of damping to keep the wheels planted as much as possible, and prevent oscillation of the suspension. The net effect is (maybe) a better ride, but certainly a car that is better glued to the road! 2. They also provide the ability to change the ride height by moving the spring perch up or down. For non-race use, this might be their primary benefit -- a lowered meaner "look" 3. They may provide shock valving adjustment. The best ones give you the ability to adjust the shocks control of the springs in both the compression stroke (when you hit a bump) and in the rebound stroke (when the spring pushes the suspension back). This level of shock control is particularly useful on race courses. Maybe less so on autocross, where an overall stiff, flat chassis is desirable. As others have suggested, there's lots of information about suspension design on the web. Don't get hung up on the term "coilover." Think instead of "shocks/springs that allow me to tune my suspension" every time you hear the word coilover. Hope this helps! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
You have to flush the Sentra suspension from your brain and look at the way the Z suspension actually works. The aftermarket coilovers for the Sentra DO work better as you state, because of their configuration, whereas for the Z this is much less true. My old '91 Sentra SE-R got a huge benefit from coilovers because it improved the suspension. For the Z, it's all about height, spring rates and shock valving. Any clearer? HTH! |
This thread is getting ridiculous.
Listen, you simply can't compare the performance of the stock suspension with a KW suspension. The KW are lighter, they have stiffer springs, better dampening capabilities and are adjustable, height adjustability. Overall as a package, the KW suspension provides much better control and works better as a unit. Its not better because of the way its installed on the car, its better because it is made to perform, that is its purpose. The stock suspension is made, first, to keep everyone happy and then for performance. Too much is lost in keeping everyone happy. No matter how badly you try to justify it, the stock suspension in either the sport or the nismo or the whatever version you want of the 370z will NOT be as good for performance driving as a set of good aftermarket coilovers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
$$$$$ maybe....... Give me the suspension option at least. Ahhh ! They saved it for the NISMO Z and charged an extra $5,000 for it plus an extra $1,000 for some body molding. The tune cost nothing for Nissan. Wankers !!! |
this is the front suspension on a 350Z
http://www.z1auto.com/images/nissan-350z-design-05.jpg A 370Z is the same for all intents and purposes (things are differently shaped but the design concept is the same this is the rear suspension on the 350Z http://www.z1auto.com/images/nissan-...suspension.jpg Again, the 370Z maintains this type of setup |
Quote:
|
350z's have a double wishbone front suspension as well, as shown in the above diagrams. Upper and lower control arms (lower being split into 2 pieces so it has multiple pivot points). The overall layout vs the 370z is very similar. Changes were made to packaging since the wheel base is different, and thus the parts need to fit into different spaces, but the general layout is very much the same
|
Quote:
heres another quote from a reviewer that states the 350z does not have a double wishbone, "That is made possible by the new double-wishbone front suspension that replaces the lower multi-link setup in the 350Z and uses lighter forged aluminum arms, a lightweight rigid aluminum-alloy cradle, a lighter, link stabilizer bar with a 35% improved lever ratio, and new high-response shock absorbers. The new 3-piece strut tower brace stiffens and quickens the front’s response." |
Quote:
Nissan 350Z Sport Compact Car Magazine http://image.modified.com/f/15584252...san16_zoom.jpg http://image.modified.com/f/15584255...san17_zoom.jpg 2003 Nissan 350Z Review Summary - Motor Trend Z vs. Z: Grassroots Motorsports Magazine Articles |
Quote:
|
The last bone stock 350z I have driven was 6 years ago when I took mine home, so I can't answer that.
"handles better" is a function of lots of things, it's too general of a statement to really be meaningful, and I think it's getting a bit off topic from what the thread is about :) |
When the sponsors who happen to own shops that do nothing but make cars perform better tell you something without them saying oh hey buy my w/e, SHUT UP AND LISTEN THEN STOP ASKING THE SAME QUESTION. Who gives a fart what it's called it involves a spring, a shock, some aluminum bits shaped like arms, and anytime you improve a piece of it it's going to handle better unless it says nismo on it because they failed on the 370z(rare for them).
I'll say it again because you're going to ask again, Coilovers literaly means having the coil over the shock absober. In the aftermarket and suspension world it refers to an adjustable unit that contains a spring on a shock most often used for racing and lowering. Your sentra had coilovers too technically. They were arranged as a macpherson strut which just means that the shock body was used as the upper suspension link thats all. You are stuck thinking that "double wishbone" involves arms shaped like turkey bones. True this is normally what the term double wishbone references like on an s2000. The 370z stuff does not again fit the literal use of the term but it is (proof enough is that Nissan hasn't been sued for saying it). The lower arm is questionable in my opinion to me it looks like a fancy version of the one off my old beretta, but that is only because the wheel is at least twice as large as the one on the beretta so the arm had to be squished a little on the sides into a wierd shape but it's still a whishbone. The front on a 350z is a multi-link setup in a wishbone configuration. the reason it handles worse is complex as the 370 is lighter, has a lower center of gravity, wider, the tires are wider, the wheelbase is shorter, and all of that affects handling so if you want to find out whats better or worse why don't you go out and buy a 350z and shove 370z suspension into it somehow and then you'll have your answer. The KW's are amazing stuff simply because they work so well with the rest of the car and cost way more than the nissan stuff(production cost as I'm sure nissan will still rape for the stock stuff) so more features and quality can be added to them. Would you pay an extra $9,000 for the car if nissan developed and gave you damptronic stuff for it? Hell no thats why stock stuff is simple. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
why did i read most of this..:confused:
|
lol I'm not exactly sure when or how this thread turned into this lovely specimen it is right now.
|
Anyone have pics of the KW setup installed on the Z?
KW is among the premier names in performance suspension...I would say the best this side of Penske or Moton quad adjustables (~$13K). You definitely can't go wrong. |
Quote:
:wtf2: |
I Like Bacon... http://www.mindspring.com/~boycekb/i...BaconDance.gif
|
Quote:
They list them as KW Variant II in the write-up but that's a mistake. |
Quote:
|
LOL i enjoyed reading the many many "WHY's" in this thread... reminds me when i was like 4! :D
I havent had V3's (not that ballin') but V2's were amazing on the road and on autox. simply amazing upgrade to have. |
What a fail thread
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
isnt the point of a forum to ask questions and get info? how come whenever i ask a question i get flamed? many people on here seem to be stuck up always thinking they know everything i ask therefore there better. this has to be one of the meanest threads ive been a part of.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He's DA BEST.
He's THE DOCTOR. He IS THE CHAMPION OF THE CHAMPIONS. He IS ... OK sorry i got carried away. :tup: |
Technically there is no KW coilover for the 370Z yet. What people have are G37 coilovers, that are a direct bolt on, and have shown to work well. There is a 370Z specific version being released soon. I suspect everything to remain the same except possibly valving. Price will be the same
There are no V1 or V2 made at all - no idea if they will, or won't, as the V3 was the most popular for the 350Z, and I suspect will be for the 370Z as well |
^^^ these are facts.
Scott |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As mentioned in post #65, it's clearly a typo. As I mentioned earlier, the only coilover made is the V3, and it's technically for the G37. There are 0 official 370Z part #'s as of now (the G37 kit fits and works well as mentioned), and there is no V1 nor a V2 now, or planned for the immediate future for either platform. |
Quote:
|
could someone throw up that flash image of willy wonka going "you lose, good day sir"
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2