![]() |
Quote:
It looks like stock rays and spacers. It will depend on your offset. More than likely you will need camber/toe kit for atleast the rear. |
Quote:
|
Yeah we had a blast, i rode with ron his z is white.
|
Quote:
|
Nice!
Anyway guys Im planning to put in a swift springs together with a 19X 9.5 and 19x11 M310 with V12 255/305. Now my question being the complete front and rear camber kits cost around 500+. Which kinda pain in my A** right now to buy. Which one can I prioritize in buying the front or the rears to make my Z close to OEM's camber alignment? Since can't afford both right now.:mad: |
Quote:
Do the rear first for sure. |
Ok Kinetics would be it!??
|
They are very good, SPL has a very good rear setup but not SPC.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Just that the design allows then to slip and or fail. Not saying every one will fail, just that other designs are better suited not to fail.
|
From an engineering standpoint, both SPL and SPC use the same locking collar design. The SPL has titanium parts for weight savings, but the chances of either design slipping are next to nil!
HOWEVER, the lockout kit from SPL will allow you to set the camber bolt and toe bolt into a locked out position any prevent and movement of the camber or toe arms at the frame connection. You can buy a lockout kit for the SPC arms if you like and achieve the same effect.... :twocents: |
spc rear camber arms
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k2...y/DSC00960.jpg spl rear camber arms http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/..._rll_z33_1.jpg |
Nice pictures..... what's your point? They both use jam nuts to lock the camber position....
|
Just trying to show the quality of each product, doesn't quite look the same.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2