![]() |
Want brakes but having trouble sorting through the BS
So I've read nothing short of 20 threads on brakes. One brand over another, 4 piston, 6 piston, fitment issues, slotted vs drilled...
Fact is, I like the stock brakes on my Nismo and I know I'm throwing myself under the bus here but cross drilled rotors and calipers look Sweet! I know your supposed to buy for performance but if I get the look I want and performance then WIN WIN. That said, who's had great experiences with aftermarket brands? I've mentioned several times that I used to own a bike shop, guys would come in that barely know how to ride and buy 8 piston spiegler set ups but they WERE such overkill!!! Should I just man up and go for the 6 piston set up or is it a waste? Can I just get by with the fronts or should I do rears too? We would change calipers out only to have guys freak out when they replaced pads at 6-8 times the cost of stock. I want to keep that in mind too. Last, some aftermarket set ups make a mess of the rims with brake dust, any feedback from experience would be much appreciated. I can sell my stockers to help recover some of the cost but need to do it soon before I put miles on the car. Any value in the stock set up? Sorry for all the questions but don't want to make a bad call. |
bump for moto and his brake dilemma..
i think thats spelled wrong |
If you have a few hours to spare, have a look at this thread.. very informative
http://www.the370z.com/brakes-suspen...ap-racing.html |
That was ONE HELL of a thread, not sure how I missed that one
Thanks so much, read the whole thing. Looks like Brembo's (still thinking about AP's) I like the part about doing it in pcs so its not such a big hit all at once. I'll run the front first and do the back down the road. So much knowledge in one post, very enlightening! One other thing I picked up on, I think the 4 piston set up will suffice since I don't plan on hitting the track often.. Again, thank you and great read! |
you would be much better off having someone (hmm, me maybe?) powdercoat your stock sport brakes. Done in a nice color, they will look as good as any aftermarket kit, and since you don't go to the track too much, they should be more than adequate.
|
Quote:
|
I may be up to that....hmmmm
I truly was just going through the sites looking for a good deal for calipers but having a hard time pulling the trigger with mine feeling ok as is plus I have other things I want to do. Any pics of calipers you've done? What's the turn around time and can you give me an estimate for going red? Can you powdercoat the strut brace under the hood. One of the guys on the board wants to do his red and I dont think he's found a supplier just yet. Thanks man |
I just saw your other post under the group buy section. What do you charge bro since the group buy is over? I'm leaning towards Brembo's but your option is much less.
|
Sorry Mike but last thing. Could you do JUST the rears and have them match the brembo red? Dont forget to let me know about the strut tower brace, if you can do that in red and what it costs. Not for me. THX.
|
Quote:
|
my recommendation is to get new fluid, pads and lines for the stock brakes. If for some reason thats not enough for you, then call Kyle or Josh at Stillen and ask for the 6pot AP Racing setup.
If you go the stock route (like I am right now), then get some Motul RBF600 fluid, Challenge Brake lines and Carbotech XP10 for the front and XP9 for the rear. That should be MORE than enough for someone who doesnt hit the track competitively..and doesnt care about bling. If I had the cash for that right now, I would have the AP Racing setup already. |
Thank you and I'll pass along the info about the brace.
Get back to you shortly. |
Quote:
I bookmarked that page as I still have to finish it haha |
As for the stock brakes they are completely adequate for street use and occasional track use. If you start driving a lot harder or tracking a lot more i would suggest changing pads to higher performance pads and brake ducting. The pad and ducting combo should be fine for the enthusiast driver.
|
|
^^Looks amazing
Probably stops good too :) |
Damn that's SEXY..Nice set up!
|
i like the color matching on the rims
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, for those looking for the best of both worlds, the February '10 issue of Modified magazine has a great read on their G35 project wrap up and independent test results. One of the improvements they highlighted was the braking system, which kicked in some pretty amazing results. No BS there! Chris |
The Truth About BBK's
I posted this on G35 Driver last year during a heated Stop-Tech vs. Wilwood thread. This may help your understanding of BBK's.
Stop-Tech’s front BBK reduces stopping distance by utilizing a smaller piston area than stock. Yes, the Stop-Tech front caliper has less stopping torque than the stock caliper. Stop-Tech BBK's are the best available. But "brake balance" can be achieved by lessor brake companies. The proper question to ask is the size of the pistons and the rotor. I’ll explain. First, all brake kits operate on the same principals. Hydraulic fluid is pushed through a line that compresses a piston which pushes the pads on the rotor. Second, total piston area determines the torque of any given caliper. For example, the stock caliper on a 2005 6MT has two 1.75 inch pistons. Do some math and the total area is 4.8 inches. This calculation uses the pistons on only one side of the caliper. So, a six piston caliper’s piston area would be based on 3 pistons. Strangely, the stock sliding calipers brake as if they had identical opposed pistons (why? Ask a physicist). Third, the number of pistons does not affect torque. I doesn’t matter if you get 4 inches of piston area with one big piston or 9 tiny pistons. Fourth, rotor diameter effects brake torque. For example, if the only modification you did to your stock brakes was increase the front rotors to 14 inches then front brake bias would increase 2%. A 13 inch rear rotor would reduce front bias 2%. That rear rotor upgrade is starting to look pretty good now... Fifth, our cars come from the factory overly front brake biased (74% front/26% rear). Although this increases stopping distance, a front biased vehicle is easier to control. Therefore, reducing front brake bias will balance the car and decrease stopping times. However, shift the bias too far and the rears may lock up before the front. VERY DANGEROUS! Stop-Tech has determined that magic amount of brake bias to magically balance a 350z/G35. I would love to know the piston area of the Stop-Tech front BBK. So you want to know the effectiveness of your specific BBK. Get a ruler and measure the piston areas and rotor diameter. Then use a brake bias calculator like the one at Tech; Brake Bias. If the ratio is the same as stock, then your brake distance will be unchanged. If the ratio is more front biased you will take longer to stop and unnecessarily burden your front brakes. If you are going front only, make sure the total piston area (and front brake bias) is slightly less than stock. A general rule of thumb is no more than 5%. Also, search the forums and call the distributor to determine if there are any problems with that specific BBK locking the rears. For example, I have Wilwood 6 piston calipers on 13 inch rotors. The total piston area is 4.06 or .74 inches less than stock resulting in 72%/28% bias or 2% more rear bias. A Wilwood 6 piston superlight BBK with a 13 inch rotor will stop in a shorter distance than stock. Of course different BBK's will have better heat dissipating characteristics, pedal modulation, etc... but that is for another post. |
Allow me to jump in here to expand upon two interrelated (yet substantially different) points that are often missed in a brake balance discussion:
1. Mechanical Balance: While it is important to get front/rear brake balance dialed in for a specific vehicle, there is no "optimum" mechanical balance -- only trade-offs. What I mean by that is the theoretically ideal F/R balance for a stock vehicle on stock springs and dampers is no longer ideal for the same vehicle that has been lowered and rides on stiffer springs/dampers. This is due to the reduction in forward weight transfer under braking on the lowered car. Since less weight is transferred forward in this case, the rear axle can contribute more before rear wheel lockup becomes a concern. This is why race cars have two separate master cylinders and a balance bar that can be adjusted by the driver. As the fuel load decreases, the car's weight balance shifts and the driver adjusts for those changes. So in order to get a street/track brake system ready to be sold to the public (as opposed to a pure racing system that is fined tuned by engineers at each individual track for a chosen suspension setup and a driver's particular style of driving), a mechanical balance is chosen that is often slightly more aggressive than the OE system. But mechanical balance can't be shifted excessively rearward or it would be unsafe for some drivers with some vehicle configurations. By the way, "balanced brake systems" are nothing new. In fact, AP Racing has been doing this for nearly 100 years (originally under the Automotive Products plc parent). But as important as mechanical balance is, it is only the starting point -- not the complete end goal. 2. Thermal Balance: This is the art and science of getting each axle to contribute to the best of its ability while maintaining a predetermined temperature range. Although many of us prefer a linear response from our brake pads (although some don't!), the pad/rotor temperature has a lot to do with the way the pad responds. If we are using the same pad compound on both front and rear, we would want the temperature of both the front and rear rotor to remain in the same range. Identical F/R temps are nearly impossible to achieve for a variety of reasons, but the goal is to stay in the sweet spot at all times -- on the street or on the track. To achieve optimal thermal balance, often special thinner rear rotors need to be made. If they are too thick and/or heavy, they will run substantially cooler than the front and won't contribute to overall brake balance the same in all conditions. That is, the system may be well-balanced when cold, but could start to become out of balance as temperatures increase. This is not ideal at all as the front pads might be in the middle of their sweet spot and the rear pads could be running too cold and not doing the job as well as they need to be doing it. When considering a 4-wheel brake upgrade (which I recommend serious 370Z owners do), check on the thickness of the rear rotor. If it is 28mm or 32mm instead of 24-26mm, it was probably originally designed as a front rotor that was later adapted to rear applications. It is often found paired with a revised front caliper, now on the rear with smaller pistons. Yes, it can be set up for a theoretically correct mechanical balance, but it will run a lot cooler than the front due to a rotor and caliper that are over-sized for the job at hand. Also, the rear brake system will be a lot heavier than it needs to be -- another unfortunate trade-off. One example: Thermal balance concerns are the primary reason that development of the carbon-ceramic system on the R35 GT-R led to a front cooling system only. After brake temperatures were monitored during a variety of street and track conditions, it was discovered that the front brakes needed cooling, but the rears were fine. In fact, adding cooling to the rear brakes would have hurt overall brake performance as they would almost always be running too cold. Are rotor size, number of pistons and piston diameter important? Certainly! But just as important are the thermal properties of a brake system. This is where years of experience at the top level of motorsports pays off. Sure, the products may end up being a little more expensive (although sometimes not by very much!), it is always worth it to go with a system that is derived from decades of experience with extreme duty applications. The magazine article I referenced above gives a good indication of what a brake system is capable of if it is balanced -- both mechanically and thermally. Chris Bernal STILLEN / AP Racing |
:bowdown:If you can afford it... or if you really mean it... AP Racing is the real stuff!
And thanks for not flaming a "forum expert:rolleyes:" who wanted to better understand how braking systems work. Quote:
|
Quote:
AP Racing (special sale found on this forum): $2659 (front) + $2136 (rear) = $4795 (normally $5349 list) StopTech (special sale found on this forum): $2695 (front) + $2595 (rear) = $5290 I'm not sure what the current pricing for the Brembo's, but their list is $7545 for the standard calipers and $13,650 for the "GT-R" calipers. Hmmm.......looks like the "real stuff" is a comparative bargain right now. Chris |
I thought I knew a bit about brakes as I used to sell quite a few sets out of my old Bike shop but I have a whole new understanding now. Our options were full floating, cast iron etc etc but there were downsides to all.
I really appreciate the time you put into this thread, its informative and not terribly biased. Thanks again! Great stuff! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
just checked it....lol |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2