How did I know I was going to see you in this thread
I wasn't disputing that the blaster does a better job. I was just saying that at $309 vs $20 it's not worth the money to a lot of people.
Of course it's still to some, however I would say their goal for it is convenience while getting flawless paint. As I can guarantee that not using it can still get you flawless paint.
Quote:
|
Absolutely not. You do want to completely dry your car with it as that is what it is for. If you have water drying on the car then that's an issue with your water, or the surface of your paint is not in the condition that it needs to be in. It also helps to dry your car in the shade. I have never experienced the water drying issue that you speak of.
|
I think you're misunderstanding me, I probably didn't state it very clear..
I was saying you want to blow the water of your paint not make it evaporate (blow drying: for lack of a better explanation let's call it the hair dryer effect). As evaporation leaves behind residue... I didn't say you don't want to get your car completely dry..
I think to most people, finances aren't the issue, it's just not worth it to most. That's a difference...(to me at least)