This quote is from the 'other' thread. I'm trying to abide by the efforts at thread consolidation here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smartbomb
There is a difference between tweaking data which is altering the facts and reporting the most favorable data. Reporting the most favorable data is not dishonst, its just not understanding what the best way to reduce data to make it useable is.
|
I think I understand what you're saying, smartbomb, and it's a valid point. There's a difference between deliberate fabrication of numbers vs. 'cherry-picking' the highest ones. That's why I try to show all runs.
This is the most recent Dyno Dynamics run that I have posted (after installing the Stillen headers):
You can see how close all three runs are.
Here's the most recent DynoJet run I have posted (done on same day as above):
Again, you can see the consistency. So in your opinion, is there any inflating of numbers going on here? I suppose technically one could accuse me of cherry-picking because I list the highest of both sets in my signature below. But it's not like I'm taking dynos where I've got three runs with +/- 10whp deltas between each run and only publishing the highest one. And for the record, I don't have sheets from other Dyno Dynamics and DynoJet dynos that I'm suppressing because they came in with lower numbers. I've spent enough coin on dyno sessions as it is!
