View Single Post
Old 08-24-2010, 12:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Jordo!
A True Z Fanatic
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 417
Jordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daleks View Post
How clean were your OEM filters when you set the baseline?
Clean -- less than a few thousand miles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarmAndSCSI View Post
Wow... nice results on the drop-ins. I would have expected much less, if measurable at all.
Admittedly, those two runs showed the greatest gains, and subsequent runs put them closer, but the range only varied by a few whp per dyno, so the general conclusion that the K&N filters made some gains throughout the rev range is a valid one.

Both are the first runs after allowing the car to cool down a bit and the oil temps were at ~200 exactly for each, so they are the most equivalent runs for comparison.

Similar differences from baseline were found on a dynapack in the K&N thread, so I'm not all that surprised -- happy, but not surprised
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote