View Single Post
Old 03-12-2010, 02:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
G Fo12ce
Premium Member
 
G Fo12ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 996
Drives: Sold!
Rep Power: 51
G Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond reputeG Fo12ce has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Thanks all for the info so far.

ARK, I don't doubt that it's good but just curious during the testing did you have a prototype that had both an X and and H? If they were both tested what would have been the benefits as far as tq/hp gains in different areas of the curve? Or did you just go with the X right off the bat.

Also you are right some of the other systems (Berk, FI, ARK, Stillen) use and X. Seems like traditional Japanese tuners (HKS, Greddy ECT) use the H design.

Last edited by G Fo12ce; 03-12-2010 at 02:21 PM.
G Fo12ce is offline   Reply With Quote