[QUOTE=ZCanadian;3743758]
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsx95
I have a manual and a DCT. Will take the DCT over 3 pedals every day of the week, unless I’m just out Sunday driving. The DCT is faster shifting, and way more consistent on the track to not unsettle the car when at the limit (not just my words). It is also easier on the clutch(es) in traffic.
It is true that it is far easier to master a DCT (and I’ve far from mastered a manual), but the feedback I get from other drivers who also have cars with either, including track instructors, is that they feel as close a connection with the DCT car as they do with the third pedal, and are faster around any course.
However, to each their own. As long as the choice is offered. Except that more and more it isn’t.
|
I feel like your defense of the DCT is actually bolstering my point. Of course it shifts faster. Of course it is more consistent. Of course it is easier in traffic. There is a certain group of skills historically requiring mastery to drive well. It is what separates excellent race car drivers from the rest of us. Now we are allowing a computer to assume the responsibility for one of those skills, and of course the computer is much better at it than we are. The computer will also be much better, faster and smoother at steering input, brake modulation and hitting brake points, acceleration out of turns, etc. It is all but guaranteed that these skills will be taken over by technology that is better at it than we are. If going faster around a track is the ultimate goal, humans will soon just be along for the ride. It is already happening. If the satisfaction of mastering skills and techniques is the goal, anything that assumes control over them is detrimental to that. And for the record...I am master of nothing! I just enjoy the attempt.
I do agree that having a choice is most important, but I don't understand why a truly dedicated car enthusiast wants to develop fewer driving skills.