What I am suggesting is that the problem be fixed in a way that will adversely affect the fewest number of people possible. Yes, my solution would mean that some people die but your solution will do nothing but exacerbate the problem - you will save a few now but doom many others in the future.
The situation will work itself out one way or the other. If we humans don't handle the situation now (reduce demand for limited resources) the environment will do it later - and with much direr consequences (famine, pestilence, and lots of other nasty stuff, see Bible for details).
|