View Single Post
Old 10-19-2014, 12:47 PM   #21 (permalink)
Redglare
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 387
Drives: C172 Skyhawk GIII
Rep Power: 174
Redglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 View Post
If camaro doesn't have false paneling under the camoflauge? This is what it will look like?

TopSpeed Renders Up A Look At The 2016 Camaro

In other words virtually identical styling... I am praying those are false panels on the pre-production. It would have been nice if they modernized the 70-81 camaro. That was an awesome bodystyle that would have been very aerodynamic as a modern reiteration. 82-92 would have been better.

(Thes thoughts based on THE MUSCLE group can't get out the past. Lol.)
I don't like the new look, I think the mustang redesign turned out much better.

Something is off with the headlights, they seem too small for all the wide panels.

Should do a complete redesign and go to something classical like you suggested.
Redglare is offline   Reply With Quote