View Single Post
Old 12-05-2013, 07:48 PM   #53 (permalink)
DEpointfive0
Premium Member Bitches
 
DEpointfive0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 14,824
Drives: a lot
Rep Power: 17151
DEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANMVQ View Post
Not sure why you tossed your " not correct " numbers ?
Hence wrong gear = wrong numbers and every dyno reads different . Your 322 on mine is probably closer to 306 WHP maybe . An they use a dynojet an those are high no? So really a 340 WHP number that reads high is more like 320 or so just saying .
Just for giggles I'm at 300 WHP on a X coupe no tune and on a known low reading dyno ( 5%) lower than anyone else around here . So on the others I'd make close to 315whp, again just saying .
They wound lose anything of their kit made 400bhp on an auto .
Just sounds weird they only want to use a manual
And autos don't lose that much more , I have seen dynos or manual guys with the same mods as me and where almost the same WHP 4-5 WHP away
I don't get this...
On your what?

I got 321.8 WHP or something in 4th gear meaning the value should be higher in 5th, the 1:1 gear ratio. AND when I ran in 5th, I hit the speed limiter and got 321.1 WHP. And yep, Dyno Jet for me too.

They read "average." Meaning Mustang Dynoes run really low, "heartbreak dynoes," Dynapacks read REALLY high, and Dyno Jets are in the middle.

Again, dyno to dyno is BS, same dyno on different days with different weather conditions is BS, lol. They just want a 6MT to assure that the kit they are advertising to have 400BHP actually HAS 400BHP. Testing it on a 7AT adds 1 if not 2 extra variables. (AT loss being more than MT, and no lightweight flywheel)
__________________
Do YOU want to know what/where I got my username from?
( Click to show/hide )
DEpointfive0 is offline   Reply With Quote