Quote:
Originally Posted by clintfocus
soooo doesnt the chart homor posted show the hotchkis as significantly stiffer then the whiteline? on top of this you run a pretty heavy stagger with a narrow front tire, which is what i use to run too and the front whiteline on full stiff was enough, then i went square sizes and it really exposed the front Whiteline as too soft partnered with the KW V3 off the shelf rates. Speaking to Doran, they ran the Hotchkis before they made there own bars because it was the stiffest, they said it themselves.
in regards to GSS138 backing me up, for one he knows me from being in the same socal track scene, he backed up up cause he knows that im not some forum know it all who just talks outta his ***, im actually out there tracking and testing, using my knowledge base of suspension tuning from years of being on track...UNLIKE yourself who drives in the mountains...  |
And who made that? How does a bar with a surface area 21.5% larger have a weakness of 166% less? I said I like stuff "like" homer posted because its simple data you can see. But the back half I don't like because it makes no sense to see those types of numbers. Hell even the stillen is 37% stiffer yet has an even greater gap with surface area. Unless WL is made from silly string I don't see it.
I'm not taking out my ***, I'm not looking for help or crying, I could care less how well respected you are, I don't give a rats *** about you. All I said to start this was I don't care for an opinion and don't see one bar being better than another when the data isn't there. Simple, to the point, bitch on.