View Single Post
Old 03-29-2013, 10:49 AM   #64 (permalink)
Red__Zed
A True Z Fanatic
 
Red__Zed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120
Red__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 View Post
No problem with the hijack. The info is valuable. I had been in jeeps back in the 80"s. When I entered the Jeep wrangler unlimited, I was impressed with the interior. Not overly gadgeted and featured to take it out on a romp. But nice enough to have passengers be pleased with the interior when going on a ride. Perfectly balanced I must say.
So basically, The jeep is very capable still, just not as capable as past body-on frames? That's good to know. Since off-roading would be a bi-annual event for me. More than that in the beginning for learning purposes. But once I know what I'm doing, 2x a year would make fun times on vacay.
I haven't messed around with one off-road much. I've heard they're surprisingly capable, but I remain cautious.

Setting aside capability, there's a simple size issue. It's much more difficult to haul something that big along a tight trail. Where a YJ might not need a spotter, a JK will. There's just too much car to keep track of from the driver's seat, IMO. For something you plan to drive to work afterwards, it is a huge detractor.
Red__Zed is offline   Reply With Quote