View Single Post
Old 03-14-2013, 04:25 PM   #25 (permalink)
syclone2163
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 19
Drives: 2010 370Z MB M6
Rep Power: 13
syclone2163 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DEpointfive0 View Post
Question for Vlad, if the figure REALLY is 70-80%, and somehow no one can ever give a straight answer...
Why is it that high?

IMO, if my car is worth $50k, you give me $40k to repair it, I'm going to rape the insurance company right back for added devaluation for at LEAST another $5-8k.
Because if a car needs 75% of it's value JUST to get repaired... We've got some issues...

And why at that point is the insurance going to risk me getting into another accident and the airbags not working this time, and now I get even more injured, and they have to now pay out 10X what they originally would have on the first repair...???

My Maxima that was totaled has water damage, $8k worth, totaled, they wrote me a check for $27,800 after my $1000 deductible...
The explanation I recieved was, we have to warrant those repairs for a year, this car will cost is more over time than is just totaling it now
Why is the total loss threshold 70-80%? Good question actually, i don't know for sure, but my best guess would be that the insurance companies want to do whatever is most cost effective to them and they will get as close to the value repairing the car as they can because that would still be cheaper than totaling it. At least that's what they do all day long with parts. They will always try to use aftermarket and/or used parts if they can before they shell out for factory parts to repair a vehicle.

Now i think you were asking about keeping the money and not fixing it, or partially fixing it is a little different. You can decide to just take they money they give you and then arrange to get the repairs done your self, not at all, or just decide what you do and do not want repaired, however if you do that you have to sign off liability with the insurance company for just such an occasion that you didn't replace the airbags that they paid to replace and got injured in another accident because of it. But if you got it repaired per the estimate they wrote, then all the airbags would have been replaced along with any related modules, pretensioners/seat belts.

Actually you can even make a deal with the insurance to keep a totaled car and just take the pay out for the repair value right before it hit the threshold, but then you have to deal with getting it re-titled as a salvaged car and all the headaches that comes with that (hard to find a good shop to do it, and hard to insure the car after).

Now water damage is a completely different story, that doesn't always take into account the actual repair cost. If the water damage was salt water its usually immediately a total because of the corrosion problems that you would have down the road. If its fresh water in a flood situation it usually depends on how high the water got in the car. Normally anything over half way up the door panel is considered a total, but again that's down to the individual insurance companies guidelines.

Oh i remember one other thing i was going to explain. Devaluation...or more appropriately, diminished value. This is something that an insurance company will never voluntarily offer you unless you ask. You can go after diminished value if you are the claimant (meaning not going through your own insurance, but the insurance of the person that hit you) and the car is not a lease. In that case the insurance company would come up with a figure for how much value your vehicle lost because it will now be listed as being in an accident and will cut you a check for that amount.

Hopefully that helps explain some stuff.
__________________
Vlad
2010 370Z MB Persimmon Touring/Sport/Nav 6MT | K&N Typhoon | F.I. 18" CBE #661 | F.I. Res. TP | NISMO Sway Bars |
syclone2163 is offline   Reply With Quote