The review makes some random factual points. No disputing that.
But it still sounds funny when folks "agree" with the review or think it's a "good" review based on a few random bullets.
It's comparing 4 cars that are not even comparable.
Compare a Z to a Cayman , or a TT etc.
Or, a stang to a camaro etc.
Or a genesis to a Camry S etc.
Or a brz to a miata, or bmw z1 etc.
Either way, even if the article makes a few random points, as a review it's a deliberate total fail.
|