Originally Posted by frost

Remember the days when you could read a news article without such blatant bias? Me neither. Anyway, I've read the bill and it's obvious they are trying to do a good thing (stop intense cyber bullying and stalking), although I don't personally care if a few wimps off themselves every year because the cool kids send them nasty messages. But, their good intentions aside, the language is just too vague and would never hold up as written. The idea that we would carted away in handcuffs for calling someone a name is about as likely as Santorum actually being able to ban pornography.