Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz
Thanks again.
Makes perfect sense (your question).
I believe you are meaning Zoomed in all the way instead of closed all the way, which would be refering to the aperture (blades inside the lens which control depth of field), which is essentially how much is in focus from the focus point from front to back. More on that later though.
The lens does not actually "Become" a 300mm lens just because you use it on a smaller sensor, it's still a 200mm lens. All you are seeing through the viewfinder however is a cropped area of what a full frame sensor would be seeing through that same lens at 200mm, which in turn becomes the equivalent of a 300mm lens on full frame. You would have to crop the image if shot on full frame to get the same image on both cameras from the same disatance at the same focal length.
Sharpness all depends on the lens. If you are using a 200mm lens on a full frame and a 200mm (300mm "appearance" when compared to FF) on crop, you will get a closer shot of whatever you are shooting while still using all 12 megapixels on the crop sensor, whereas you would have to crop the image of the full frame cameras shot to get the same photo, therefore reducing the total megapixels when cropping. You would have to use a 300mm lens to get the same shot from the same distance as the crop sensor of shooting full frame. I'm saying a lot of stuff over and over but hopefully it aids in understanding of all this jibberish
|
big light bulb just went off in my head when you mentioned that it's essentially a "cropped" image, so at 200mm since it would be cropped to the center of the lens it would seem as though it was more "zoomed" hence being what a full frame 300mm would look like. But if you actually took the same shot with a full frame 300mm lens and manually cropped to 1.5 you'd actually have a 450mm zoom shot correct?