View Single Post
Old 12-16-2011, 01:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
butdamnbrian
Enthusiast Member
 
butdamnbrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: bay area, ca
Posts: 254
Drives: the ladies wild
Rep Power: 14
butdamnbrian will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigaudiofanat View Post
The kenwood you only use double sided tape to stick into place, the only notch you have to make is in the light housing.
this is not a knock against any previous installs, but i still think double-sided taping a $180 camera to the exterior of the car after wiring it through a notch made to the light housing is twice the effort and ten times the money for a less elegant solution. why not just buy a twenty dollar plug and play part (that's been tested with success) for a fifth of the price? if it fails, it can be replaced cheaply with no trouble (and without having to peel tape off car).

i'm kind of surprised anyone would point a customer toward such an expensive rear camera that tapes to the bumper when there are less expensive and more utilitarian alternatives out there.

if the driver places a high premium on clarity of rear camera picture or extensive head unit control over the camera, i can understand the kenwood, but otherwise the kenwood seems like a misuse of resources to me.
__________________
Ex-Build:Alpine W910•Focal Polyglass 165 V30 6.5" Components•Stereo Integrity BM mk. 3•Zapco DSP6-SL•Arc Audio XDi Amps•Nissan Livina Rear Camera•Axxess•Spare Retained•

Last edited by butdamnbrian; 12-16-2011 at 01:30 PM.
butdamnbrian is offline   Reply With Quote