I'm loving them :tup:

those wheels look sick. :tup:

how do you not have traction in 1-3 with that amount of hp?

And what's your camber at?

I thought he was going to toss up some huge number and then...

None the less pretty badass! :tup:

On my old tires(295/30/20) and stock wheels I have no traction.

What number were you looking for?

435whp, granted the Mustang dynos tend to read low. That's probably 450-465 on a Dynojet.

How much rear camber are you running?

:yum: In for pics once these are installed! I loves me some wide tires! :tup:

435whp on a mustang dyno on my 7AT is not 450-465 on a dynojet.


Camber with the 295/30/20 is 2.6.

What would you say it is, then?

-2.6 on your old stretched tires definitely explains a lack of traction. Hopefully the new setup helps you.

There is no calculation to it or science to it to convert numbers between dynos and you know this.

I am going to go on a dynojet soon and find out.

I am more than happy with what it is putting down considering it is a 7AT.

I know that, which is why I said "probably" and gave a 450-465 range on the average DynoJet.

Mainly because someone said your numbers read low, I wanted to point out that Mustang dynos typically do... it wasn't a knock at you or your car at all...

No wonder. Need to be as perpendicular as possible for maximal traction. Hopefully you can achieve that despite a 13" width wheel with (likely) very aggressive offset. You should have all the traction you need with 345 tires, otherwise easy on pedal to the metal. :tup: Have you considered an aftermarket traction control unit?

I know. :tup:

But seems like so many people get wrapped up in a "number" to attach to a car. Any dyno can be calibrated to read whatever. The dyno is a tool not the "end all be all" for indicators of performance on the street.

Ain't that the truth. :tup: