![]() |
Are the PS4S recommended for Daily Driving ?
Unfortunately when I bought my new Z the tires were worn out so the time to replaced them is now. I see everyone on the forum is talking about the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Tires but as someone who doesn't do any track racing are they worth the investment or are there other tires that would be better value for the daily driver?
|
I DD mine. :tup:
|
Why wouldn't they be?
|
If you can afford,why not.?
|
These are street tires. It's not until you get into the "extreme performance " aka autocross tires, that you start to sacrifice streetability. These are about the best tires you can get for the street.
Now, there are tires that are more economical and perform nearly as well if you don't need the absolute best tire. Look at Bridgestone and Continental for high quality alternatives. |
Well like the op I'm gonna need tires soon, 50/50 hwy and twistys, I'm not hard on the car in the corners and a tire that lasts awhile would be good!
|
Go read the reviews on tire rack.com for the PS4S. Very positive, if not phenomenal.
|
They're good from what i've read. You can't go wrong with them, but I personally wouldn't spend that much money on them. I'm running the Conti DW with no issues.
|
Quote:
The PS4S is a great tire. If that's what you're wanting, its great. |
have had the PS4S since May, great tire all around, they did great at the autocross this past weekend, were a bit more sticky then the last set of PS I had... They did well on the trip too, since I went to Dayton to autocross with my son
|
I'm rocking em. I dont track my car but with how easily the back wheels break free I absolutely adore them. Then the few times I go into the canyons or mountains they prove to be reliable and predictable through every single turn. I started a thread on them here, check it out. Lots of people have put in their opinion. None bad.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mich PS4 - 242 x 4 - 971 - ??? - Similar compound to Hankook RS3 (larger sipes/ thicker tread) Pirelli PZ4 - 218 x 4 - 875 - BEST comfort - mild/low life (personally certifiable) Conti sport - 208 x 4 - 835 - ??? Potenza S-04 - 204 x 4 - 816 - low life (oem - 12k mild abuse) Notable extremes - Dunlop ZII - 285 x 4 - 1033 - long life +23k (personally certifiable-track and canyon abuse - 3 sets on 2 different cars) Potenza RE-11 - 249 x 4 - 999 - decent life Potenza RE-71r - 225 x 4 - 903 - reported low life -15k Based purely on one size - the PS4 is the most expensive out of the summer max tires. I'm not entirely sure they will last any longer or post significant lap times over any other tire other than the S-04 on this list. If the PSS's is any indication (which they aren't really, completely different compounds) The cost is not worth it versus an extreme or a cheaper Max summer tire like the PZ4's or ContiSports. Continental has proven their tires can withstand track torture. PZ4 imo feels excellent for street driving, but ultimately too soft if you plan on abusing them. I'm personally hesitant on wasting money on the extra cost of the Michelins because i was never "wowed" by the PSS or PS2's.:ugh2: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:wtf2: What's too soft for daily driving? I thought they're 300 treadwear |
Y'all need Jesus... and by jesus I mean the street tire God PS4S
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/public/...ry-braking.png http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/public/...et-braking.png http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/public/...S-lap-time.png http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/public/...t-4-S-wear.png and how is it wasting money? Over and over they've been proven and chosen over all other brands. Not to mention their insane warranty policy. Now if you can't afford them, then thats one thing. I get it, it's a lot of money for tires. But if you want the best youre gonna have to spend money to get it. But saying that their not as good as conti or pz4 is not true. They're so much better. |
Yeah, the only tire that is better and may be not anymore is re-11's. They never compare the BS re-11 to the Michelins for whatever reason and the re-71 is more a track/auto x tire. Michelins tend to wear better and you are definitely paying for the warranty and if you get another set of rears out of that then I would say it's a good deal!
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I'm not talking about the grip levels, but the sidewall and compound. There are several higher treadwear tires with soft compounds that will wear extremely fast with heat abuse or normal day to day driving. The treadwear rating isn't only a measurement of its potential adhesion, most of it has to do with tread thickness, not the compound. And the differences between the 200utqg and 300utqg tires are becoming increasingly small. Thus these "cheater" tires that potentially outmatch the comparative competition. And i never said they weren't better, i said its not worth the additional cost IMO. With consumable products, value means a lot to some people, and i don't mean that by simply suggesting cheaper is always better. I waste money on expensive hooplah all the time lol. The test you posted Goldy is not even comparable tires outside of the fact they have a similarly rated UTQG and tread depth. There are several tires in the specific category that may share the same designation, but completely varying characteristics. One may have a hard compound/soft sidewall, and another may have a soft compound/hard sidewall. Such is the case with the OLD nero GT tires. Hard as diamonds compound, soft sidewall. The PS4s is directly comparable to the PZ4, ContiSport, S007 and the somewhat distant V105's, in which they are all well within the handling window of the PS4 for almost 100 dollars less a set (if not more). And if you are going to pay that difference for the 20-30k miles, why not get something like a set of extremes. If you are measuring lap times and stopping distances then they are unquestionable better at this. The RE-71r has a measured dry 50-0 of 72.0 feet, the PS4s is 80.2 (tirerack tests-same car same size tire) Two guys here that would be great test markers for this argument is Rusty and Firehawk. They will be able to say which will last longer (contisport vs ps4's) and how well they last in varying conditions and its overall longevity. |
Ok, I'm here. :icon17: I can comment on the PSS's. The P4S's, I've only got about 2,000 miles on them. I have the 285/35-19's on the front. They have a lot more grip then the PPS's I had on the front. At the Dragon. The PPS's would push some in the hairpins. I could get the P4S's to push a little, BUT that was driving at over 85% on the street. Not healthy. In the rain. It poured on the way home from the Dragon. As with any wide tires. You have to watch the deep water. With the rain. I really didn't have any problems will them. Asked the guys who followed home. :driving: Mileage wise. It's to soon to say. Overall, I'm impressed. :tup: :driving: I'm still waiting to do some trackdays with them. I'm waiting on my OS Giken diff to come in.
|
Quote:
Camber levels? shocks/springs? |
Quote:
Rear, camber -1.75, toe +1/16". Shocks, stock Nismo. Springs, stock Nismo. |
Quote:
|
I don't have many miles on my ECS's, maybe 1k at most so far. I run 285 square. I didn't get to run them at the dragon, but the improvement over the Advans in stock sizes is significant. The difference is greater in the rain. Breakaway characteristics are smooth, but I really have to force it with my car being NA. The new Tirerack tests show the PS4S coming out on top, but the difference is small. The ECS had higher overall wet grip and braking, but they claimed it was harder to use the highest levels the tire had to offer than the PS4S. Turn in and response were faster than the PS4S, but dry traction and braking were slightly lower. Honestly, the traction the car has now is beyond my driving skill. Unless I drop the clutch in first, it's not burning out. That's with 330+ and 260+wtq for reference. I live in Tampa, which is primarily why I jumped on the continental tires. Emergency braking is huge for me with all these idiots on the road when it's raining. And the fact I bout all 4 for under $1k is a pretty outstanding deal.
|
Quote:
|
If I did not purchase the Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 R’s all around for the Z the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires would have been my next choice.
|
It is an old post, but as it is revived, some people locally who used PS4S on track has their tires chunked, I think it is an issue related to track use and high temperature. So, I would say it would only suit street and autocross.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That sounds 100% correct. The Bridgestones are known to have super stiff sidewalls, especially when you go up the performance ladder. So you really don't need much air in them to get stable handling. When I ran RE-11s and RE-71Rs for daily driving, I would have them set at 32 psi, mainly because I found they wear evenly at that pressure. The door pressures were causing more wear in the middle of the tread. I did run different wheels compared to stock, so that likely also affected it. Now I don't daily the car and it usually sits on the Conti Extreme Contact Sports with around 34 PSI. Regarding the performance metrics listed earlier in the thread are for extreme driving conditions. So during track conditions, I wouldn't doubt the Michelin's worth. If anyone is DDing, they shouldn't be getting near those limits on the street anyway as that's ridiculously irresponsible. So getting a comparable tire for significantly less money would make sense. tl;dr, I would get Michelins if I was sensible about doing Daily driving and track work with one set of wheels. |
Thanks for the feedback, particularly on the info regarding the stiffness of the sidewalls of the Bridgestones. That was my impression about the stiffness of the sidewalls of the Potenza S007s, which I liked.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2