UpRev tuned my 40th
 

So I finally got my car back from the body shop (it was rear ended over a month ago), and got a chance to put on my exhaust and had it UpRev tuned by performance motorsport in smithtown NY.


Installed Mods: stillen gen3 intake, cnt test pipes, invidia gemini catback

1700 miles on the car, fresh oil change (ester), about 80deg out yesterday afternoon but not very humid, Mustang Dyno

Before tune: 321hp/246tq
After tune: 336hp/254tq

peak gains of 15hp/8tq

And as you can see from the dyno sheet it made up quite a lot of tq that was lost in the low end after the bolt ons. The car feels amazing and pulls really strong even in this heat, at night when it cools down it's even better :tup:

I don't have any dyno's before the intake, but most people saw about 20hp total from cat back/test pipes, so figure just under 300whp with just intake. This seems really high to me for a mustang dyno and I am sure a lot of you will agree, but chuckd05 has similar results on this dyno and backed it up with a completely different dyno (dyno dynamics).

I really don't know how much "adjustment" these shops can make to a dyno to have them read higher/lower, but mustang dynos are notorious for reading LOW, yet our cars are making great power.

A side note about the CNT test pipes: the brackets didn't meet up with the stock bracket on the transmission, there was a gap and the bolts ended up coming loose because of that, so it would rattle at 1800 RPM exactly (someone else complained about this recently), I just took off the transmission cat bracket instead of forcing the gap closed which would have caused a lot of stress. Hopefully no issues with cracking since the gemini has flex pipes. Not bad for $200 shipped!

Those seem high for those add-ons or you are running a leaner mixture to find more power from the tune, but baseline before tune seems really high. it is shows there is no real power loss through the transmission which there definitely is some loss. Interesting to look at, thanks for posting

i dont have a baseline, the run before tune was all mods.

Your add-on baseline was what I was commenting on, before the tune seem really high but I don't know much about mustang Dyno's,

Something fishy there for a MUSTANG DYNO.. RCZ who is supercharged put down like 390WHP on a MUSTANG DYNO. Which is what 50 whp more than you.. ??????

Yea thats really high for a mustang dyno, That looks like dynojet numbers to me. Expect around 300whp on a mustang dyno with your mods and about 235wtq. Im also trying to figure out why your torque is all over the place. Should be relatively flat. its probably just the scale they used.

How much did it cost to get tuned?

I will be gettin my car tuned there on thursday. He quoted me about 600 for the tune.

It's the scale and the smoothing that make it look erratic, and it's definitely a mustang dyno

600, includes the up rev license

I'm going to try to find a dynojet to compare with, I'll post results

I had similar mods when I UpRev tuned mine on a Mustang dyno. I showed 286 whp when tuned for a gain of 11 whp.

thanks for the results, nice gains!

So the OP made like +50WHP over yours on the same type of DYNO.. I wonder whats going on here... IF the OP's result are accurate that would mean that his car is making 400+hp on a dynojet, etc and ~ 390hp on the Mustang, impressive for an NA v6 w/ just intake - exhaust - tune!

im sure this dyno is reading high, typically a dynojet will read 20-30hp more for our cars vs a mustang dyno, and I highly doubt I will put down 360 on a dynojet. I plan on finding a local one and trying it out though.

Got the tune from uprev. Car peaked at 325 hp and 248 torque

crank ?

hahahah

The JWT intake probably did you dirty.

all it does is suck hot air.

[QUOTE=hybridnation;593540]all it does is suck hot air.[/QUOwhat hp are u guys at

Awesome gains, can't wait to get my mods and tune done by Performance Nissan.

i guess you mean performance motorsport? great guys there, and they know uprev well.

^ Yeah, LOL. You know for a Dealer to recommend them they have to be good.

Don't get your hopes up. This is another one of those 325+ whp dyno threads that makes guys like me shed a tear when they have full bolt ons + Uprev tune and barely break 300whp.

Maybe its the gear the pulls are being done in.. maybe my tuner had the a/c on while he was tuning... i dont know. lol

Seen a few of UpRev dyno reports, they're all strange to me when it comes to the developing of torque-values. I can't believe German cars are so much different from US cars regarding torque, but German dyno results look different - much more homogeneous.


Here's a result from my stock car w/ Q300 (no reflash or something, higher line is torque):
http://www.my350z.info/download/file...6711&mode=view


All dynos/cars I've seen (in Germany) have a curve like that - why so much difference to the American cars???

Your torque curve is not different than ours, it just appears flatter because of the scale they used on the graph. If the Y axis increments in large values, such as 50 like yours does the line will not appear to deviate as much, and look flat. The sheet I posted has the torque axis incrementing in steps of 7, which will make small fluctuations much more pronounced.

Ok, correct & good argument. Anyway I still wonder why the torque-curve is so strange (beginning at 1600 u/pm). Isn't it more interesting to see what power you have at a specific u/pm from the beginning? Isn't a complete graph actually telling you more about the cars characteristic than a closer look only at the highest peak?
Ok, friend is telling me that the most interesting part in the states IS the highest peak because of local laws (you don't have a autobahn, most ppl just look for the numbers).

As far as a few forummembers tell, tuning seems to be different in our countries because of local laws and possibilities (you don't have a TÜV and can stick together whatever you want).

Are you referring to flat spot on my graph around 1600 before shooting up? That just how this particular dyno recorded it, it's not as if there is no power and then suddenly there is. I think you are looking for something in these dyno sheets that is not there lol

Well, I can't see what's not on the sheet - and that's the complete graph from 0 to 7900 upm. ;-)
Looking at what actually is on the sheet does not promise to be a stable & rock solid tuning to drive... Just my 2 cents.

This graph is either bs, it's not scaled right, or I'm reading this incorrectly. That graph is impossible, the math doesn't add up.

his graph is in Kw/Nm, not hp/tq

Gotcha, thanks. :tup:

Esfourteen, I'd love to know what you trap at the drag strip. Then we could confirm if the dyno you used really does blow up the numbers or not. I made 295whp and trapped 107mph. Sadly, stock 370s have trapped 107mph. That doesn't say much for my tune :(

im very sure that I would not trap much higher if at all. This car is not magical, all dynos read different, some low, some high, this one happens to be higher than most. Despite the higher readings, a delta is a delta and I picked up quite a bit from my tune. That does not mean everyone will though as all cars are different as are tuners abilities. There really are too many variables at play, but I would be curious to see what your dyno looked like after the tune without the motordyne manifold.