can those even hit 100? :stirthepot:

We need this! Please do it. I'd like to know what my car used to be vs what it is now.

What's up bro...please stop, you are suffering PTSD, experiencing boost and going NA in the same platform is bad juju :crying:....snap out of it!!!!!

least we got one in this summer

I might be selling my PBox next week, let me know if you guys are interested. It is more accurate than looking at a speedo that isn't accurate

I just took the times of my 1/4 mile videos
Its between 6.8 to 7.0 seconds
Will post pics tomorrow.
I just posted in the driveline section pics of my 0 to 60 times
with 4.08 gears and full bolt ons

Z

Z

Wow that's crazy. Like same 50-100 almost but over 2 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile. My setup sucks!

At least we all have the same inaccurate speedo. :tup:

a. his setup is made for traction at the start. the start is a big fctor in your ET

b. more HP nd the HP in the Z's powerband is at the top so his trp is higher. he pulls harder on the high end than most becuse of having more power.

Well that's the beauty of this thread. Who ever has more power (and lighter weight) will show in the times :tup: no dumb dyno's all reading different.

yea that it will.

i'm still curious to see what i can pull. sadly we have been getting random spurts of rain ever day and with the colder temps it's not drying out when i'm able to do it.

however we got anice stretch of high 60's and low 70 degree days coming up.

i will try and get a vid then.

I'm going to try and get one in today

My trap speed was 114.2, best trap was 114.7
60 ft 1.800
0 to 60 mph between 3.85 to 4.0.
RWHP 309 SAE dyno jet
The M 370 intake makes a big difference and I did not loose top end .
I tuned by my self on Cobb.
I can not see it going any quicker than 12.34 for a 7 AT

Z

mine was:

12.89 @ 110.74
1.950 60'

full weight and full tank of gas.
OEM size street tires and OEM wheels

I'm glad a lot of these results are coming from the drag strip. I would like to contribute at some point, but I don't make it out to the track or the drag strip very often.

well it is in the track/strip section so it kinda covers it's bases there. lol

Can someone please tell me what gear we are doing this in. Thanx

well initally i thought it was we ran at a constant 50mph then got on the gas to hit 100mph.

then i found out it's a free for all when syno posted his vid of just timing his 50-100 while going WOT from the get go.

users choice i'm guessing.

Thanx man I thought the same do 50 MPH in a a 1-1 gear like 5th ? But guess at can do 50 MPH in 3rd and jam it. Ok I just want to make sure do this right. After Noah finishes his ark and the rain stops I'll try this maybe Saturday on the way to or from the dyno.

i feel we should implement a standard so to speak of how we do this for consistency.

like 50mph roll in 3rd or 4th then smash the gas.

i will be doing a full pull and then seeing the time in the vid of 50-100 just so i can beat scotty lol :stirthepot:

50 mph roll in 4th??? That's not going to work out well. IIRC, 90 mph is about the upper limit in 3rd gear with stock gearing (according to the FSM).

fine 3rd then lol i said both in my post just making suggestions since no one else has lol

:tiphat:

Well, I was wondering about 2nd. If you're going to do a full pull, you'll probably be in the upper RPMs in 2nd when you hit 50 mph. So you'll have to shift to 3rd and then probably to 4th as well before you get 100 mph. Dunno if 2nd gear at high RPMs plus the time to shift to 3rd would be better or worse than being in 3rd at lower RPMs to start.

not sure but i feel that you'd be real high up in the RPMs of 2nd where it may be worse to start there. not sure without testing it though.

In 4th I can get 120+ more like 125 ish, My 3rd get me too 100 ( Like 99) These are starting at 2500 RPMS, I think that's like 40 MPH forget what the MPH is.

But agree we should make a starting point, Like 4th gear 50 MPH and jam it :driving:

just something for consistency.

i can do a full WOT pull and be faster than a TT guy starting in 4th. well maybe not sure depends on spooling and other factors but you all get my point lol

data can be skewed if there isnt a consistent and constant procedure that is followed.

If you're comparing how fast the vehicle is, why would you want to deliberately start that test at such low RPMs that are way below the powerband? 4th gear makes absolutely no sense IMO. At least in 3rd gear I believe you would be around 4K RPMs at 50 mph.

**note** I am speaking to NA vehicles here, not FI.

Consistency is the 50-100 mph speed range. Counting the timing via the inaccurate speedometer and a video will skew data accuracy anyway.

I would say just do it as fast as you can. Try out different methods if you want. Either way it will be a poor mans result without proper timing equipment.

I know the 2500 RPM is below our power band more in the 3's but these where for tuning purposes and was just stat the MPH and gear I was using. I'll do 3rd gear is fine with me, The 99 MPH is more like 105 or so, my speedo is most likely wrong with my 20's still on the car :)

its in the description. it needs to be done the fastest way possible. 2nd to 3rd or 4th works depending on your redline. start low in 2nd and go.

there is a consistency. lol no one ever reads the first page. all other cars have been done like on a drag strip. they all start in 1st and go till whatever. you need to already be moving past 50 as fast as you can. anything else will just be slower and pointless. you cant change it now or else you wont be anywhere close to any of the other 50 cars that have been done already.

50?............


do you mean the 4 people you have on the first page?

:facepalm:

No sorry, the 86 you've missed on the first page.:owned:

Interesting thread...i didn't read the whole thread but the few things i read through are a little confusing lol... I understand that you want to find out how fast we can go from 50-100 and we could fly through those 50mph if we want to, BUT you also mentioned early is to see how we would stack up against and evo or subi starting at 50mph then going to 100mph on the highway or so?? those are two different test that should be done don't you think? 50-100 (ricer fly by, no offense intended it just reminds me of civics racing from different start points at different speeds:confused:) and steady 50-100 which it will be a more realistic scenario.

i meant the list of us members here:

Username, Year, Make, Model, Lbs, L, Cyl, Induction, Boost PSI, Fuel, HP, TQ, 1/4 ET, 1/4MPH, 50-100

1. phunk, 2009, Nissan, 370z, Stock weight*, 3.7, 6 Cyl, TT, 8psi, E85, 524, 401, NA, NA, 4.3
2. SS_Firehawk, 2011, Nissan, 370z, 3500*, 3.7, 6 Cyl, twin SC, 11.88psi, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, 5.4
3. synolimit, 2013, Nissan, 370z, 3200*, 3.7, 6 Cyl, All Motor, NA, 93, 302, 244, 14.0, 105.5, 6.5
4. Megan370z, 2009, Nissan, 370z, 3125*, 3.7, 6 Cyl, All Motor, NA, NA, 321, NA, NA, NA, 7.9


:facepalm:

i dont care what the stock list of cars you found have. :shakes head:

i get what youre saying but youre quoting months ago, so let me rephrase then. i want to take the drag racing out of it. i want the skill level equal. we can all roll and push a pedal. so start at 20 and go to whatever. the first 49 cars i posted are all 50-100 taken from a drag strip. so the next 37 cars you see are done the same way. hence the consistency comment. you see me on that second list twice...consistent i promise you. i dont know where or how you get your numbers. im just telling you to get them the fastest way possible. in the end we shall see who has what and who wins bragging rights. also this is a perfect test for you to see what parts did what to your car. this is a real rolling dyno.

PS and to me a 50 roll isnt "more realistic." to me whenever ive rolled its at a slow enough speed in 1st. but im not going to say do 10 or 20 or 30 etc because then skill comes into play with shifting more and it'd be hard for everyone to keep it the same. im only showing you what a magazine showed you!

dude...no ****, i know thats what youre talking about! and 37 cars arent stock! you clearly didnt understand what i was talking about. your comment and point are invalid. i said its consistent and it is. youre worse than a ******* wife. nitpick on anything and everything just to start something! you have eyes, i know this, ive seen them. you know when i said 50 i was talking about the mass list i posted on the first page both stock and modded! you understand you are the complete definition of an internet Troll yes? if youre not trolling then dear god i feel bad for your intelligence quotient. :shakes head:

ok....so if you're going to race someone in a "close street" starting at 50mph its not more realistic?? and what magazine showed me what??:confused:

:facepalm:

the rest of us normal humans in here were discussing how we want to make this equal and consistent for us. no one spoke of your little list on page one of care most of us dont care about. it's really just a cool thing for us on here to have little fun. we were having a nice fun time until you came back in.

you do it in every thread......ever. you are the literal definition of a troll. look at you in the NA brag thread. someone got serious numbers finally and instead of inquiring about it and congrats you go and start shit about it being STD numbers. like wtf dude. just because someone spent money on real parts and made real power you get salty because your ebay mods havent compared in the slightest bit yet for obvious reasons.

:shakes head:

you take everything way too serious dude.

just relax, have a drink, maybe get another neck tat lol :stirthepot:

Like I just said, no. A drag from a roll always happens in 1st. If not first then second at 20-30 max. To me that's realistic as that's what I've seen and done since 16.

The first 49 posted were from a magazine. Meaning you saw, I saw, it's public knowledge. I don't mean you literally read the article, but I'm saying its a copy of it that I posted.