![]() |
Track alignment spec
Hi guys, any recommend for what would a good spec to start with the alignment for track and DD dual usage? What're the camber and toe setting? Or anything you have tried and worked? Thanks in advance. :tup:
|
Do you have camber arms?
2-2.5* all around is a pretty decent call for track time. I run 0 toe up front, and spec in the rear. If you don't have camber arms, I'd try it with rears matched to the fronts, and the same toe settings as above. |
Quote:
|
Personally, that has worked well for me.
The z is very prone to understeer, but dialing it out with just camber is tough. A stiffer rear sway is a good call. Car does need rear toe. I just stick with stock spec. |
Quote:
Nismo 370 Front Camber -.58 Caster 8.17 Toe 0.03 Rear Camber -1.58 Toe 0.08 I think I will just start from square camber setting and go from there. Thanks. |
Front camber is not adjustable, neither is front caster.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Eibach Recommended Align. Kit |
yes, it works. I have it. Be advised though, it is actually a repackaged SPC kit. It even has SPCs directions with it. Not that there is anything wrong with that. If anything, it gives SPC a little more credibility.
|
You can get front camber with a bolt? I thought you need a new control arm?
|
Quote:
If so (with a bolt) how does that work? I need more camber on my setup. I'm at 1.5F and 1.8R and being it's not DD I could defiantly do it with no sweat. |
thats just a picture of the rear. the front is a new upper arm
|
Mike, what do you think of the SPC arms for the front? I know people have concerns about the single, non-locking bolt and them holding their alignment. Any issues or suggestions?
I wrote to SPL and they say their arms are a future project on the table but no official release date. |
Quote:
|
I would tend to think that if your going to just mess with camber/toe F+R, from stock you would want to toe it in slightly, keep the Fcamber maxd and the Rcamber maybe 1.6 so it doesnt get overly sticky through a corner compared to the front camber of 1.5 and gives you slightly better power delivery out of corners than say 1.8. This being a FR car with a natural weight bias to the front you would ideally want a little more camber up front (to reduce understeer) as thats where the weight is going into turns. This is not based on experience but just me thinking about it here for a min so i may be way off : )
|
It depends on how much street driving you do.
For an aggressive track alignment I use: Front: 0.03 toe -3.5 camber Rear: 0.05 toe -1.8 camber This gives an aggressive turn in feel and good corner stability. I found that going beyond this for rear camber is detrimental overall. If you are street driving a lot I would back the camber down slightly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Do you have sway bars?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Mine is -3 camber -.01 toe front and
-2.5 /.04 rear |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Although it is true that a stiffer swaybar will prevent body roll and thus reduce the camber gain on the outside wheel, because the car rolls more you need more camber gain...so it is really not about the reduction in camber gain. A stiffer swaybar actually transfers more vertical load on the outside wheel and reduce the vertical load on the inside tire. This is the nature of a swaybar as the outside tire gets pushed up, the bar will start to put some of that upward force onto the inside tire...thus decreasing the vertical load on the inside tire. This increase in the difference between the outside and inside tire vertical load means the overall lateral grip will be less. The reason for this is something called the tire performance curve. I added is a picture of a tire performance curve from my app below. Basically as you increase the vertical load on a tire it does increase it's lateral grip, but the increase in lateral grip is not linear. In other words for each 10lbs of vertical load you add to the outside tire you will get a smaller amount of incremental lateral grip. Conversely as you reduce vertical load on a tire, it looses a greater amount of lateral grip for every 10lbs of vertical load it looses. This is a key reason why stiffer swaybars reduce lateral grip. This is why the end of the car you add a stiffer swaybar to will have less lateral grip. So you might ask...why run swaybars at all? They are there to make the car handle more consistently and predictably and also to help with achieving the balance of the car you like. I hope this helps. Cheers Martin Crisp Setup Workbench - Home iPhone version Setup App |
Quote:
|
Wow there is so much more to this. What tire are you using? What shocks and bars, How wide are wheels and tires.
There isnt a set spec that is good for track in my opinion. It depends on your setup and tires. I was running -4 camber up front with 1/4 toe out and about -2.75 rear with a little toe in on my 370Z nismo with 1000 lb front spring and 450 lb rears. 37mm Progress front bar and stock nismo rear. 315 Hoosier A6 rear and 295 Hoosier a6 front. On track that was ideal setup that Grand Am team settled on. Car was perfectly nueteral and tire heat/wear was ideal. I went back to -2.75 front and -2.0 rear with similar toe recently and really dont like track handling compared to more aggressive alignment specs. |
I hardly drive my car as DD as I commute to work on Motorcycle. I avg about 135 miles DD a week on 370z and track about 4-5 times a year.
I currently have set up as: Front Camber: -2.9 Toe: 0 Wheels: Stock Rays 19X9 Tires: Bridgestone Potenza RE-11 Size: 245/40R-19 Rear Camber: -1.8 Toe: 0.2 Wheels: Stock Rays 19X10 Tires: Bridgestone Potenza RE-11 Size: 285/35R-19 I will be going 18x10.5 w/ Hankook R-S3, 285/35-18 Square setup soon. |
I know a lot of people have recommended -1.8 camber in the rear due to the amount of compression our cars have. But it does not work for me. Maybe it's the weight I've removed but I have -2.3 rear. Also run 305 rear with true type Coilover setup.
|
I am doing -2.1 both front and rear at the moment.
|
i like this thread :tup:
|
This is good stuff... There seems to be a lot of ways to do it... I'm on swift springs with stock wheels. I put a camber kit in the rear and am getting an alignment on Friday. Was hoping to get back to stock specs initially, but there seems to be a lot of options, I drive my car on the street more than the track, but will auto cross and have an occasional trackday.
|
2010 with stock sport Rays, Accelera tires 245 front 275 rear with a cusco front sway, stock rear sway and tein lowering springs ... No idea what specs to get
|
When I set up my Z for the One Lap of America, I will be going with:
Front Toe: 0 Camber -2.5 Rear: Toe 1/16-1/8 total toe in Camber -1.8 All settings will be done with a driver IN the driver's seat. Which I consider a necessity. Also, this is with stock springs and shocks, aftermarket front upper arms. Tracy Ramsey |
Quote:
|
^^^ what they said. Pretty much what I run and the car feels great. Problem for me is I run so many different tire setups and switch between autox and HPDE. Seems to be a nice medium though.
|
Front (SPL)
Toe: -.05 (slight toe out) Camber -3.3 Caster 8.7 Rear: (SPL camber and toe) Toe: 0 (this did work but as I have softened the rear it now needs a little toe in) Camber -2 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2