Took this at Zdayz in the baseball diamond where they had the car show and I was pretty happy with how it came out. Critiques welcome.


http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h9...psh20o7yv8.jpg

Zdayz 2015 woohoo!

And a couple rolling shots on the way home...

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h9...psacdkhmqq.jpg

The wife took this one, it's a bit blurry...

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h9...pshqghpqxi.png

http://i1184.photobucket.com/albums/...s/DSC_0323.jpg

http://i1184.photobucket.com/albums/...s/DSC_0393.jpg

http://i59.tinypic.com/ohptok.jpg
http://i61.tinypic.com/2ivlity.jpg
Couple of my favorite places to shoot up in NY

Great shots jshare. I love shooting waterfalls

I enjoy it shooting waterfalls since most of the ones I frequent are tucked away off the beaten trail, quite relaxing. Sometimes I want to upgrade my equipment but I think my shots still come out decent enough

For the professional photographers out there, I have a question regarding Upgrading my camera; I use a Rebel T1i (SO OLD lol) with a 50mm f/1.8 & the 18-55 Kit Lens. I am thinking of upgrading to the 6D + 24-105 f/4. I have used a 24-70 F/2.8 & 70-200 F/2.8, and while I do love them, they cost much more then I am looking to spend.

Question is this; Is the 6D + 24-105 F/4 the best Bang for your buck Full Frame SLR available? I would wait for the 6D Mk II, but it'll probably cost more for the Body then the 6D + 24-105.

You can practically do anything you wanted with a 6D and 24-105. If you don't any specific thing, that simple setup is almost unbeatable for the price and quality. No need to wait for the mark ii, it isn't going to be anything that much better than the current, its just hype.

One last thing, unless you have a need for the 2.8 aperture, the cost can hardly be justified. I use the 24-70 f4 and the 70-200 f4 both with IS and they are amazing. I have an 85mm 1.8 for DOF on portraits when needed.