2013 Ford Shelby GT500 Matches ZL1’s $54,995
|
Now all that's lacking are performance numbers!
Looks like Ford vs. Chevy is back 110%. |
That's great news!!! Ford gt500 is going to slaughter the ZL1
|
yea, the gt500 will deffinitley take the ZL1 in sales, i believe.
Would be wise for chevy to boost the SS' horsepower passed the 5.0's 420hp. It's due for an increase/change, and could win some sales from ford on the lower end. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Fully decked out I priced out the GT500 at $66,000! Not bad for that much HP! and not to mention the car has data acquisition from the factory for the race track!!! Woot Woot!
|
Quote:
For that kind of money you are in M3/Z06/used gtr territory, all of which I would rather have over a $70k mustang. Regardless of performance. |
+! ^^
i think i would spring for the GT500 at the entry price. fully decked out price, i'd rather hop into a GTR or M3. |
Quote:
|
Wow.
Not that I'm complaining, because I think it's awesome, but man, car performance ratios in the last 5 - 10 years are off the chart. Who would have predicted this kind of ridiculousness even just 5 years ago? If there was a graph of car HP and performance over the last 100 years, until 2000 it would be like a long slow steady incline. From 2000 - 2005 it would start going up hill quickly. But from 2005 until now, it would look like a straight up cliff. Wow, this is just crazy nuts awesome. Ralph Nader has to be hating this trend.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's called a sleeper hahahaha. And I would much rather grab a slightly used Any of those others stated above. I would get the ZL1 over the stang, but owning a camaro I guess I'm biased lol. I have driven many GT500's and have done nothing but break loose every time I get behind the wheel |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No need for more than a 285 back there. :roflpuke2: |
Am i the only one that is not into muscle cars? Performance wise they are awesome, but design wise they lack a hint of elegance like imports do.
They should just make the gtr the z and make another super car that is over the top :stirthepot: |
Muscle cars were never intended to be elegant!
|
Muscle cars should look big and mean.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Or a small penis...
|
Im sure they prefer fat wallet over small wee wee
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Some guy that has to drive a minivan all day would say you bought your z to compensate for a small pee pee. He's just jealous.
|
Quote:
You know.... Red-necks. |
I have never heard it from rednecks, just people that were stuck driving normal cars for some reason.
|
would you rather choose used GTR over shelby?
I think I would choose GTR |
I wouldn't choose a used GT-R over a GT500 for several reasons. One of the biggest being that being able to "buy" a car and being able to "afford" one are two totally different things.
A GT-R especially used is every bit as expensive to maintain as the typical 250K + super car. For one if that transmission goes to **** you could be down 20K just like that. Car and Driver demonstrated this fact in their long term test of the car. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You break a part on the GT500, easily replaced and costs the same as a standard mustang part to replace. For those saying they'd rather own a M3/GT-R/Z06, your point with the GT-R and Z06 can be understood, but why would any of you want to own a car that a $27,500 car eats and shits out with less than a grand in mods (referring to standard GT vs. M3)? Things are a dime a dozen here in Germany, the Germans are afraid to mod them for fear of voiding the warranty and killing their 15 year loan investment... yes, they can take out 15-20 year car loans and do, just to drive a fancy car:icon17: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2