Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Other Vehicles (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/)
-   -   Drag Race: 2012 Lexus LFA vs 2010 Nissan GT-R (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/22404-drag-race-2012-lexus-lfa-vs-2010-nissan-gt-r.html)

SgtGoldy 07-21-2010 07:42 PM

Drag Race: 2012 Lexus LFA vs 2010 Nissan GT-R
 
[hope this isn't a repost]
Soooo impressive... I love love, love, the look and sound of the LFA... but the GTR is much better for the price... I can't believe how close it is.

Lexus LFA - $400,000.00
Nissan GTR- $90,000.00

MC 07-21-2010 07:51 PM

yeah it is a repost but its all good...

and by the way a stock GTR will do about 11.5 @ 121

marcus 07-22-2010 07:19 AM

the LFA looks 100 times better!

shadoquad 07-22-2010 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marcus (Post 638934)
the LFA looks 100 times better!

And costs three/four times as much.

MMC Racing 07-22-2010 07:58 AM

GT-R has 4 exhaust tips versus 3.. 4>3 so GT-R>LFA

Tronchaser 07-22-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 638967)
GT-R has 4 exhaust tips versus 3.. 4>3 so GT-R>LFA

Can't argue with that logic! :roflpuke2:

SgtGoldy 07-22-2010 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 638967)
GT-R has 4 exhaust tips versus 3.. 4>3 so GT-R>LFA

lol! makes sense, I base all my judgments on that:

Hooker with 1 std or 2?
well If im gonna get one, might as well go all out

MMC Racing 07-22-2010 10:33 AM

LFA shatters glass. GT-R shatters records... ;)

Jordo! 07-22-2010 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 639260)
LFA shatters glass. GT-R shatters records... ;)

Nissan needs to hire you as an ad man -- that's good :icon17:

Red370 07-22-2010 02:42 PM

GT-R's can be had in the 70's, vs. a $400,000 car, pretty damn impressive.

m4a1mustang 07-22-2010 02:46 PM

The money doesn't matter any. You could make a lawn mower run 10s if you wanted to. :P

MC 07-22-2010 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red370 (Post 639631)
GT-R's can be had in the 70's, vs. a $400,000 car, pretty damn impressive.


09's can be had in the mid 60's mine will be forsale in about october in the $61-62K range

Red370 07-22-2010 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC (Post 639744)
09's can be had in the mid 60's mine will be forsale in about october in the $61-62K range

oh damn, if I could have snuck in another deployment in the last year, I would have paid you cash :(

SgtGoldy 07-22-2010 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC (Post 639744)
09's can be had in the mid 60's mine will be forsale in about october in the $61-62K range

why you selling MC? moving onto the lexus? lol

HKYStormFront 07-22-2010 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 09Nismo (Post 640377)
why you selling MC? moving onto the lexus? lol

:bowrofl: hahaha he's getting a 2012 gtr, the updated version

vividracing 07-22-2010 09:28 PM

Wow! Godzilla came pretty close! Put 30k in that GTR and it would smoke the LFA and use the extra 300K and invest in a House ;)

SgtGoldy 07-22-2010 09:30 PM

or invest in a whore house....

Wicked_G 07-22-2010 10:08 PM

400,000 for a LEXUS?! :inoutroflpuke:
The GT-R is a ...ninja!!!

mrcardio 07-22-2010 10:27 PM

Citing ¼ 0-60 times, trap speeds, or dollar signs as reason enough to deem cars such as the GT-R, ZR-1, and Dodge Viper (A lot cheaper) superior vs. the Lexus LF-A is completely missing the point. By that logic pretty much all super cars are a rip off which couldn’t be farther from the truth. You could put 20-30k in an EVO and smoke almost anything. And? Forget about driver involvement, the fun /joy of driving, the sound of an F1 like V10 at 8500rpms, the confidence a well engineered car inspires, etc, etc.

As far as I'm concerned the LF-A is leagues above the GT-R in the areas where it really matters. If all I cared about was winning races at the light sure I’d choose a GT-R. If I wanted what is probably the best overall performing street legal sports car I’d buy a Porsche GT2 RS. It all of course depends on what you want but to dismiss an automobile based solely on test track numbers / price is pretty ignorant. Well, unless all you care about is getting from point A to point B the quickest.

MMC Racing 07-22-2010 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vividracing (Post 640390)
Wow! Godzilla came pretty close! Put 30k in that GTR and it would smoke the LFA and use the extra 300K and invest in a House ;)

Actually, $995 for a Cobb Accessport would do the job.

MMC Racing 07-22-2010 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcardio (Post 640465)
As far as I'm concerned the LF-A is leagues above the GT-R in the areas where it really matters.

Because you've drove a LF-A too, right? :rofl2:

HKYStormFront 07-22-2010 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 640497)
Because you've drove a LF-A too, right? :rofl2:

:bowrofl::bowrofl: here we go again...

mrcardio 07-23-2010 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 640497)
Because you've drove a LF-A too, right? :rofl2:

No, I haven't driven an LF-A. In this case I trust the reviews and my personal experience with the GT-R al though that's not really the point. The point is as I've explained, being that test track numbers are far from the only variables that deem a particular automobile superior, worth its price, etc, etc. If you're having troubles comprehending this I truly feel sorry for you.

The GT-R lacks a lot of the credentials most true driving enthusiast desire. Just because an automobile happens to be quicker to one or the other doesn’t by default mean it’s flat out the better car. Now if your life depended on bragging rights and winning stop light races sure the GTR is really hard to beat.

But if you actually like to drive, there are a **** load of automobiles more desirable than a Nissan GT-R believe it or not. This is probably hard for you to swallow seeing as you apparently own a GT-R and think its God’s gift to automobiles. You being a smartass asking “Because you’ve drove a LF-A too, right” just goes farther on to prove just how much in denial you are.

And regardless the only reason the GT-R stands a chance in hell against the LF-A in the ¼ mile is due to AWD. The LF-A has a lot more top end power trapping the ¼ in 124-126 on average. But again, this is besides the point.

Anyone with any real knowledge of cars understands what I’m talking about.

MMC Racing 07-23-2010 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcardio (Post 640812)
But if you actually like to drive, there are a **** load of automobiles more desirable than a Nissan GT-R believe it or not.

See, you lost me right here. What are you trying to say?

MC 07-23-2010 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 640849)
See, you lost me right here. What are you trying to say?



let me translate.... im buying into the magazine hype where atleast once a review someone says that the car drives its self and leaves the driver with no real emotion attachment because it does everything for me

HKYStormFront 07-23-2010 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC (Post 640923)
let me translate.... im buying into the magazine hype where atleast once a review someone says that the car drives its self and leaves the driver with no real emotion attachment because it does everything for me

:iagree: and that's bullsh!t :gtfo2:

Ty Weezy 07-23-2010 10:09 AM

Sure there are other qualities that go into a car's overall value and appeal other than speed, but the point here is pretty obvious: The LF-A is not worth over 300K more than the GTR. Plain and simple. I mean lets be honest, if someone is going to fork out 400K on a car they wont be getting a Lexus when they could buy a lambo, porsche, ferrari, etc

shadoquad 07-23-2010 10:11 AM

mrcardio does have a salient point, though, in that cars aren't judged by performance vs price alone (bang for buck), or else any supercar becomes an impractical waste, and so do almost all luxury cars for that matter. But all the same, I think that GT-R owners ought to have pride in the fact that their <100k car can stack up with 400k supercars in performance. They win the bang for the buck argument against a car 4-5 times as expensive. Now, the rest? I dunno. Fit-n-finish, exclusivity, gizmos... I dunno.

daisuke149 07-25-2010 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ty Weezy (Post 640943)
Sure there are other qualities that go into a car's overall value and appeal other than speed, but the point here is pretty obvious: The LF-A is not worth over 300K more than the GTR. Plain and simple. I mean lets be honest, if someone is going to fork out 400K on a car they wont be getting a Lexus when they could buy a lambo, porsche, ferrari, etc

I disagree. worth is based on what your looking for. If you just want pure numbers, yeah its no contest.

but those looks, the exclusivity of owning only one of 500 ever made.

The fact that its going to be different, a bigger head turner than most other cars by far..

All depends on what you want.

If EVERY car purchase was decided purely on numbers, you can say bye bye to ferrari, lamborghini, etc. everyone of those buyers would have a GT-R. Or heck a zr-1. Now dont tell me a zr-1 is "better" than a scuderia?

Its all preference. But until i can "choose" to afford either.. :-D im just not even gonna worry about these 2 cars.

SgtGoldy 07-25-2010 11:48 AM

I'll admit it turns heads... but so does an R8 cost way less and imo turns head just as well

MMC Racing 07-25-2010 12:16 PM

mrcardio - question for you. If you can't stand cars without a 3rd pedal, why would you heap any praise on the LF-A?

daisuke149 07-25-2010 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 09Nismo (Post 643631)
I'll admit it turns heads... but so does an R8 cost way less and imo turns head just as well

true. but you can buy an r8 next year. and after that. and after.. etc.

If you reallllly wanted to do nothing but turn heads, you'd run around naked wailing your arms and screaming!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2