Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   North East Region (http://www.the370z.com/north-east-region/)
-   -   Bikers Attack Driver After Accident: Caught on Tape (http://www.the370z.com/north-east-region/79613-bikers-attack-driver-after-accident-caught-tape.html)

DEpointfive0 10-02-2013 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lothario (Post 2512905)

Beautiful, I will be joining immediately

SouthArk370Z 10-02-2013 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck33079 (Post 2512889)

"So we're actually obeying the law." ROFLMAO. How can one NOT believe everything that guy says.

Chuck33079 10-02-2013 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SouthArk370Z (Post 2512914)
"So we're actually obeying the law." ROFLMAO. How can one NOT believe everything that guy says.

Especially when the entire group ride was unauthorized and illegal. He must have meant they were obeying the speed limit, not obeying the law. And considering how much of the encounter the bikers filmed when it showed their group in a bad light, nobody happened to film the moment that might show some kind of fault from the other driver? Not that I think cutting someone off deserves this, I just think it's funny that's the one part they didn't record.

Cmike2780 10-02-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2512906)

Meaningless. I'm not a lawyer or detective nor claim to be one. It's just my own opinion and you're free to come up with your own. It will be up to a jury to decide. There are a ton of videos of the incident we haven't seen including what happens after the camera cuts out. Correct me if I'm wrong, but vigilante justice on the guy in the Range Rover is hardly lawful either.

DEpointfive0 10-02-2013 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck33079 (Post 2512916)
Especially when the entire group ride was unauthorized and illegal. He must have meant they were obeying the speed limit, not obeying the law.

Mhmmmm... Lol

I wish they went back and said... So... Those videos of you guys running a red light... Those were "legal", you guys were acting as the police, right?

Lothario 10-02-2013 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEpointfive0 (Post 2512908)
because in my eyes, that biker's head should've been under a Michelin.

Continentals.... lol

Chuck33079 10-02-2013 09:53 AM

I think we've finally found something nice to say about run-flats :rofl2:

Red__Zed 10-02-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck33079 (Post 2512910)
There's no doubt he'll be civilly sued by the paralyzed rider. I hope they cram that lawsuit back down Captain Cripplevan's throat, because if you're in a group of people doing stupid/illegal ****, you don't get to complain when you become collateral damage.

That flies in the face of freedom of association.

GBA does not exist in US law (except in limited cases such as in medical care)

DEpointfive0 10-02-2013 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 2512917)
Meaningless. I'm not a lawyer or detective nor claim to be one. It's just my own opinion and you're free to come up with your own. It will be up to a jury to decide. There are a ton of videos of the incident we haven't seen including what happens after the camera cuts out. Correct me if I'm wrong, but vigilante justice on the guy in the Range Rover is hardly lawful either.

Honestly, in a respectful way, I'd like to disagree, if YOU were in the RR, let's even say without your wife and kid. And you felt your life was being threatened because these guys swarmed you and were hitting your car and trying to open the door...
Wouldn't you do the same? Without general regard for maybe hitting an "innocent" biker?

Or would you just sit there and catch the initial beating?

DEpointfive0 10-02-2013 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lothario (Post 2512921)
Continentals.... lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck33079 (Post 2512922)
I think we've finally found something nice to say about run-flats :rofl2:

LMAO!

And are we sure that RR's come with runflats? My uncle' sand cousin's both have a spare tire and it doesn't feel too harsh of a ride to be honest

Chuck33079 10-02-2013 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEpointfive0 (Post 2512927)
LMAO!

And are we sure that RR's come with runflats? My uncle' sand cousin's both have a spare tire and it doesn't feel too harsh of a ride to be honest

Other than the fact he drove for quite a while on a slashed tire, no.

Red__Zed 10-02-2013 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 2512917)
Meaningless. I'm not a lawyer or detective nor claim to be one. It's just my own opinion and you're free to come up with your own. It will be up to a jury to decide. There are a ton of videos of the incident we haven't seen including what happens after the camera cuts out. Correct me if I'm wrong, but vigilante justice on the guy in the Range Rover is hardly lawful either.

There's zero evidence of when or how the tires got slashed.


Taking down the RR guy would generally be disallowed, although the fact that he hit and run complicates things, as most states enforce as a felony.

Fleeing felon rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coupled with the belief of observed attempted murder/manslaughter, you could probably make a good case for the chase/apprehension. If the driver was knifed as he claimed, things get tougher for the biker responsible, as well as if there's any evidence pointing to needless beating, etc. The fact that he's alive and was released from the hospital in ~2 hrs indicates that there was probably not much gratuitous beating.

Future videos could tell a lot.

SouthArk370Z 10-02-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2512923)
That flies in the face of freedom of association.

GBA does not exist in US law (except in limited cases such as in medical care)

It goes way beyond association. It was active participation in reckless behaviors that endangered others. Apparently you haven't seen the videos from earlier in the day when the riders were doing wheelies in heavy traffic and veering over into oncoming traffic. I'm assuming (not a legal opinion) they didn't stop when they got near the RR. When you do dangerous ****, you sometimes get hurt. Ie, if you fuque with the bull, you get the horn.

DEpointfive0 10-02-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck33079 (Post 2512930)
Other than the fact he drove for quite a while on a slashed tire, no.

I think Range Rover and Continental should use this as a commercial.
Like a Chevy "Like a Rock" commercial, mixed with a bit of Top Gear

Chuck33079 10-02-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SouthArk370Z (Post 2512933)
It goes way beyond association. It was active participation in reckless behaviors that endangered others. Apparently you haven't seen the videos from earlier in the day when the riders were doing wheelies in heavy traffic and veering over into oncoming traffic. I'm assuming (not a legal opinion) they didn't stop when they got near the RR. When you do dangerous ****, you sometimes get hurt. Ie, if you fuque with the bull, you get the horn.

Exactly. And legally, he shouldn't have been there anyway since he didn't have a license.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2