![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
|
Looks great!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you do something to the brick/stone wall on the right side of the pic? |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wonder what that image would look like if desaturated everything outside of the storefront/awning/car? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPizzle using magic and new-fangled science stuff |
Quote:
|
rts_kaneda - loving that overhead shot man! Also, huge fan of the high-res shots on here, got a Retina MBP and with some of these shots as wallpapers it's just :eek::drool::yum:
|
Quote:
Did you use a high ISO for those top pics and then just touch them up in PS and/or Lightroom? I want to do some night shots but I don't know how to have them come out well-lit like that. I want to make sure I'm doing everything right with my camera settings (D5100) instead of just over processing everything in PS. You can message me so we don't clutter up the thread if you like. Sent from my iPizzle using magic and new-fangled science stuff |
Quote:
I'd like to know as well.. |
Night photography is best with a tripod. You can keep your ISO down and ensure sharp shots. Locking your mirror up so that there isn't as much camera shake from the shutter helps as well.
|
Some may have seen this picture floating around but it just made Best Z of The Day AND Best Z girl of the day on Facebook. Both notoriety's in one shot! Its sad we do not have this one anymore. I hope the new owner joins the forum.
http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/a...2/D3X_5905.jpg |
I didn't know you sold one. I thought you were still rocking both.
|
Quote:
Quote:
To be honest I do not know that much about photography either, all I've picked up about night photography is that if you make your aperture as low a number as possible (I normally have it between F3.5-F5), and then have a play around with different settings of manual exposure (whilst using a tripod) you will get quite crisp colours and edges so very little work will need to be done on Lightroom (what I use). I'm not skilled enough yet unfortunately to find a location and instantly know what level of manual exposure is needed. But in the past without changing the aperture I would need to take 5-10 second photos and there would be a lot of grain. Since altering that setting first, the pictures are between 1/3 - 3 seconds to take (battery life goes a hell of a lot further too now) with little to no grain. Hopefully this info can help you guys out too. |
Quote:
1) With a low iso (100/200) and longer exposures. 2) On a (good) tripod 3) With a remote release (Nikons have a fantastic super cheap remote that is all you'll ever need) It's the ML-L3 if you want to look it up, but you can get them anywhere online. I'm sure Canon has something similar. 4) If your frame has a delayed shutter release option, or mirror lock, use it. This raises the mirror then waits a short time before releasing the shutter, which lowers the chance of vibration/blur since you will be using a longer exposure. One neat trick for night shots is to use a really strong filter on a remote flash to highlight a subject. Then adjust the color balance (easiest in post, but can be done in-camera), which puts your subject in correct WB and everything else gets shifted to an array of odd colors. |
Quote:
Don't forget you can use a reasonably higher ISO combined with a wide aperture to achieve a faster shutter speed. Longer shutters will give you more noise. Lr's noise reduction is pretty good at cleaning up your images. One other thing to thing to think about is metering on the right spot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
First of all, not trying to take over this thread, but it is a photography thread essentially and there seems to be a lot of interest in these answers, so instead of PM'ing all of you, here you go.
For the beginners, rts_kaneda was using a looooow ISO on most shots, I'd say between 50-200, the pictures are just too clean, with the exception of the one with the city lit up in the background (little noisy), still an awesome shot but a higher ISO might have been used. When taking shots at night, a tripod is mandatory if you want to be creative with your shots, setting your camera on the ground or a table etc because you don't have a tripod often leads to less of an interesting perspective. 2nd, is either of these 2, a cable release, or shutter delay/timer that can take the picture without physically depressing the shutter (shaking the camera). Mirror lockup is overkill IMO unless your shooting macro shots of items the size of a penny taking up the entire photo to where if the camera moves a fraction of a millimeter, it will cause blur in the final image. On car shots its just not necessary, although if you have a cable release and want to do it just because, go for it! 3rd, FOR BEST RESULTS shooting when its dark out, shoot low ISO (200 or less), and long shutter speeds. Shooting with a high ISO to get high enough shutter speeds will only result in grainy images and should only be used if a high shutter speed is needed for that shot to get the look you desire. Even with the slight amount of noise that occurs from taking long exposures, I guarantee you it will be cleaner than any shot you take with your ISO up around 1600+ to get your desired shutter speed to get the shot without a tripod. Your ISO is simply: your sensors sensitivity to light. By upping its sensitivity (using higher ISO, also creating more noise) so the shutter doesn't have to be open as long to create the proper exposure does not make sense when (if shooting with a tripod) you could have it at its lowest ISO, therefore yielding the cleanest photo, and instead of trying to get handheld shots at higher shutter speeds, allowing your shutter to stay open on a tripod for 5-30 seconds in order for all that light to come in and get the same picture, only with way less noise. 4th, so now shutter speed and ISO are dealt with, white balance will most likely be on auto, and can be corrected in post processing if its a little off, but what about aperture? My suggestion (for night shots) is shoot between f4 and f/11, f/8 is optimal. It gets a tad bit confusing from here, but the good news is aperture will be the least of your worries on these long exposure shots, but I'll break it down a little anyways. Aperture is: the blades inside the lens and to what degree they're opening for each shot. Attachment 64515 If shutter speed and ISO are constant, your aperture setting will adjust the exposure because it allows more, or less light to hit the sensor during the set amount of time the shutter is open for. It also controls depth of field. At higher number apertures f/11,f/16 etc you will have more in focus from front to back, but the shutter will have to stay open longer to get the proper exposure because not much light is entering through the blades and getting to your sensor. Shooting at a smaller f number f/4, f/5.6 etc will blur the background more and isolate your subject. That's about it. If you guys have any other questions feel free to PM me so we don't take up more of this awesome thread! |
here's a few of my night time Z shots
http://images.us.viewbook.com/6e0565...aaac_large.jpg http://images.us.viewbook.com/bb5440...8def_large.jpg http://images.us.viewbook.com/44e60e...35e7_large.jpg |
So awesome Dallaz
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I took the lightning shot separately but it is my photo. It was near my house and the storm was right above me. I used a fisheye to get as much of the sky in the frame as possible, camera got a little wet from the rain and I was constantly wiping the front of the fisheye off from water getting on it, but worth it! |
Quote:
Oh. one other thing. If you're using a tripod/remote with a VR or IS lens, turn vr/is OFF. No point and it actually can actually lower clarity as the vr/is motors move about. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In my case i just take the picture and upload it and i do it with my ipod or regular camera |
Quote:
Great advise summary. Raf |
Damn! Those r best shot!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 |
The moment I see pro sigs on these shots, I know I'm doomed. A lot of pro shots and simply can't be on par with these guys. So here's my amateur shot.
I know the week just started but I can't wait for the weekend for some wine tasting and awesome food in Los Olivos, CA. I will be taking her up for a nice drive and through the canyons at 154 through Lake Cachuma. I should have new tires and wheels by then. Fingers X'd. http://i985.photobucket.com/albums/a...psfcd5da79.jpg http://i985.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps940a21dd.jpg |
^^^ Looks good! And as far as pro shots... Do it!!! Think my photoshoot was $350. But you have professional photo that will last forever!
|
Quote:
Off topic, you back home or still in Iraq? If you're out there, be safe bro. I remember you giving advice on flushing the wheels. The car's gone a long way since then. Later. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2