'Tis why looks are subjective and we have many different choices which is fantastic for car guys and gals.

To me the Cayman has very classic lines. The Z has aggressive lines but I don't think it will age the way a 240 or early 280 did (before 80's bumpers), nor an unmolested Z32 has. Similar to my eye as the C7 Vette (not to tangent but another example of aggressive line design that I don't feel is a classic, timeless look).

The first Gen Cayman looks the same within a 7 year model year for the most part: you can't tell if its brand new or an old one. That is what drew us to our used 2007. Its fun seeing both 2 seat sports cars in the garage: different tools for different drives, but 100% fun in both cases. :driving:

- b

this is what i meant lol, but i thought the 370z was faster then the E46 M3?

on a track day it definitely a drivers game, but i thought the 370z was faster then the m3 around the track when given to a professional driver

EDIT:
yep it is faster behind the hands of the stig
http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/top_gear_track.html

M3 CLS 1.28 '03(E46) 360hp/1385kg
370z 1.27.50 '09 330hp/1583kg

I thought the M3 is a V8?:confused: Mixing past nd present? He did say 'V6" and the Z has been faster in a straight line than cayman's and Cayman S. anything else, you are going three times the Z price and you're probably including F.I.'d 6's.

The Z is probably the fastest NA v6 to $60k, hands down, and beats some turbo 6's, not all..

from all of it my 2 cents, the 370Z is a fun car....
I like the style, I like the feel, I like the power

It's a welcome change of pace from the usual whining that goes on.

the E92 M3 has the 4.0L V8 but the one before it the E46 M3 has the 3.2L i6

thats why I also said. "Mixing past and present?" :tup:

Pretty narrow car segment we are down to there don't ya think...